定义安全度量来评估电子健康记录系统:在智利的案例研究

Gastón Márquez, C. Taramasco, H. Astudillo
{"title":"定义安全度量来评估电子健康记录系统:在智利的案例研究","authors":"Gastón Márquez, C. Taramasco, H. Astudillo","doi":"10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a digital document that stores sensitive patient information. In this regard, there are novel techniques and methods for satisfying security in EHR in specific domains (such as authentication, networking, cryptography, among others). Nevertheless, there is not enough evidence on quality instruments composed of cross-cutting security metrics obtained from academic as well as grey literature. This article proposes a quality instrument that measures the satisfaction degree of security in EHRs. The instrument is composed of five security approaches and nineteen security metrics collected and characterized from the academic and grey literature. We evaluated the effectiveness of the quality instrument in a case study with 20 healthcare actors in Chile. The results suggest that the metric is quite effective, but it depends on the degree of security training of the clinical staff. The findings of this study support the idea that our quality instrument can be considered as a starting point to evaluate the quality of EHRs.","PeriodicalId":202587,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Security Metrics To Evaluate Electronic Health Records Systems: A Case Study in Chile\",\"authors\":\"Gastón Márquez, C. Taramasco, H. Astudillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a digital document that stores sensitive patient information. In this regard, there are novel techniques and methods for satisfying security in EHR in specific domains (such as authentication, networking, cryptography, among others). Nevertheless, there is not enough evidence on quality instruments composed of cross-cutting security metrics obtained from academic as well as grey literature. This article proposes a quality instrument that measures the satisfaction degree of security in EHRs. The instrument is composed of five security approaches and nineteen security metrics collected and characterized from the academic and grey literature. We evaluated the effectiveness of the quality instrument in a case study with 20 healthcare actors in Chile. The results suggest that the metric is quite effective, but it depends on the degree of security training of the clinical staff. The findings of this study support the idea that our quality instrument can be considered as a starting point to evaluate the quality of EHRs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

电子健康记录(EHR)是存储敏感患者信息的数字文档。在这方面,有一些新的技术和方法可以在特定领域(如身份验证、网络、加密等)满足电子病历的安全性。然而,从学术和灰色文献中获得的由横切安全度量组成的质量工具没有足够的证据。本文提出了一种测量电子病历安全满意度的质量工具。该工具由五种安全方法和十九种安全指标组成,这些指标是从学术和灰色文献中收集和表征的。我们在对智利20个医疗保健机构的案例研究中评估了质量工具的有效性。结果表明,该指标是相当有效的,但它取决于临床工作人员的安全培训程度。本研究的结果支持我们的质量仪器可以作为评估电子病历质量的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining Security Metrics To Evaluate Electronic Health Records Systems: A Case Study in Chile
The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a digital document that stores sensitive patient information. In this regard, there are novel techniques and methods for satisfying security in EHR in specific domains (such as authentication, networking, cryptography, among others). Nevertheless, there is not enough evidence on quality instruments composed of cross-cutting security metrics obtained from academic as well as grey literature. This article proposes a quality instrument that measures the satisfaction degree of security in EHRs. The instrument is composed of five security approaches and nineteen security metrics collected and characterized from the academic and grey literature. We evaluated the effectiveness of the quality instrument in a case study with 20 healthcare actors in Chile. The results suggest that the metric is quite effective, but it depends on the degree of security training of the clinical staff. The findings of this study support the idea that our quality instrument can be considered as a starting point to evaluate the quality of EHRs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信