{"title":"军事集成产品团队的绩效能否预测商业成本降低计划的成功","authors":"Robert C. Smith, Mohamad Hammoud","doi":"10.17858/JMISCI.38992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the early 1990s, U.S military leaders began to copy commercial enterprises by assembling integrated product teams (IPTs) to adapt and implement commercial cost reduction programs (CCRPs) for military organizations. However, no evidence existed in literature that military IPT performance related to CCRP success. A non-experimental quantitative correlational study was conducted to find whether or not a relationship existed between military IPT performance and CCRP success. A questionnaire distribution yielded 80 acceptable responses, and Spearman’s rank order correlation and ordinal regression were employed for correlation and predictor significance analyses, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysis results revealed a strong positive relationship between the IPT Performance and CCRP Success, rs = .70, p < .01. The correlation coefficients between each of the six variables of IPT Performance and CCRP Success were IPT Communication rs = .64, p < .01, IPT Coordination rs = .57, p < .01, IPT Balance of Member Contributions rs = .51, p < .01, IPT Mutual Support rs = .65, p < .01, IPT Effort rs = .36, p < .01, and IPT Cohesion rs =.67, p < .01. Ordinal regression analysis yielded three significant predictors, IPT Coordination (Estimate = .23), IPT Effort (Estimate = -.40), and IPT Cohesion (Estimate = .24). Military managers should first assess whether or not their organizational systems are conducive to hosting IPTs and whether or not their organizations contain the necessary resources for hosting IPTs. Future researchers should employ a larger sample and a qualitative study to observe team interactions for identifying characteristics of teams and team members. Keywords: commercial cost reduction programs, integrated product teams, military, team performance, program success, integrated product and process development.","PeriodicalId":434443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military and Information Science","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Military Integrated Product Team Performance Predict Commercial Cost Reduction Program Success\",\"authors\":\"Robert C. Smith, Mohamad Hammoud\",\"doi\":\"10.17858/JMISCI.38992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the early 1990s, U.S military leaders began to copy commercial enterprises by assembling integrated product teams (IPTs) to adapt and implement commercial cost reduction programs (CCRPs) for military organizations. However, no evidence existed in literature that military IPT performance related to CCRP success. A non-experimental quantitative correlational study was conducted to find whether or not a relationship existed between military IPT performance and CCRP success. A questionnaire distribution yielded 80 acceptable responses, and Spearman’s rank order correlation and ordinal regression were employed for correlation and predictor significance analyses, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysis results revealed a strong positive relationship between the IPT Performance and CCRP Success, rs = .70, p < .01. The correlation coefficients between each of the six variables of IPT Performance and CCRP Success were IPT Communication rs = .64, p < .01, IPT Coordination rs = .57, p < .01, IPT Balance of Member Contributions rs = .51, p < .01, IPT Mutual Support rs = .65, p < .01, IPT Effort rs = .36, p < .01, and IPT Cohesion rs =.67, p < .01. Ordinal regression analysis yielded three significant predictors, IPT Coordination (Estimate = .23), IPT Effort (Estimate = -.40), and IPT Cohesion (Estimate = .24). Military managers should first assess whether or not their organizational systems are conducive to hosting IPTs and whether or not their organizations contain the necessary resources for hosting IPTs. Future researchers should employ a larger sample and a qualitative study to observe team interactions for identifying characteristics of teams and team members. Keywords: commercial cost reduction programs, integrated product teams, military, team performance, program success, integrated product and process development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Military and Information Science\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Military and Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17858/JMISCI.38992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Military and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17858/JMISCI.38992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在20世纪90年代初,美国军方领导人开始通过组建集成产品团队(ipt)来模仿商业企业,为军事组织适应和实施商业成本降低计划(CCRPs)。然而,文献中没有证据表明军事IPT表现与CCRP成功有关。进行了一项非实验的定量相关研究,以确定军事IPT绩效与CCRP成功之间是否存在关系。问卷分布得到80份可接受问卷,分别采用Spearman秩序相关和序数回归进行相关分析和预测显著性分析。Spearman相关系数分析结果显示,IPT绩效与CCRP成功率呈正相关,rs = 0.70, p < 0.01。IPT绩效与CCRP成功的相关系数分别为:IPT Communication rs = 0.64, p < 0.01, IPT Coordination rs = 0.57, p < 0.01, IPT Balance of members Contributions rs = 0.51, p < 0.01, IPT Mutual Support rs = 0.65, p < 0.01, IPT Effort rs = 0.36, p < 0.01, IPT Cohesion rs =。67, p < 0.01。有序回归分析产生了三个显著的预测因子,IPT协调(估计= 0.23),IPT努力(估计= - 0.40)和IPT凝聚力(估计= 0.24)。军事管理者应首先评估其组织系统是否有利于举办ipt,以及其组织是否包含举办ipt所需的资源。未来的研究人员应该采用更大的样本和定性研究来观察团队互动,以确定团队和团队成员的特征。关键词:商业成本降低项目,集成产品团队,军事,团队绩效,项目成功,集成产品和工艺开发。
Does Military Integrated Product Team Performance Predict Commercial Cost Reduction Program Success
Abstract In the early 1990s, U.S military leaders began to copy commercial enterprises by assembling integrated product teams (IPTs) to adapt and implement commercial cost reduction programs (CCRPs) for military organizations. However, no evidence existed in literature that military IPT performance related to CCRP success. A non-experimental quantitative correlational study was conducted to find whether or not a relationship existed between military IPT performance and CCRP success. A questionnaire distribution yielded 80 acceptable responses, and Spearman’s rank order correlation and ordinal regression were employed for correlation and predictor significance analyses, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysis results revealed a strong positive relationship between the IPT Performance and CCRP Success, rs = .70, p < .01. The correlation coefficients between each of the six variables of IPT Performance and CCRP Success were IPT Communication rs = .64, p < .01, IPT Coordination rs = .57, p < .01, IPT Balance of Member Contributions rs = .51, p < .01, IPT Mutual Support rs = .65, p < .01, IPT Effort rs = .36, p < .01, and IPT Cohesion rs =.67, p < .01. Ordinal regression analysis yielded three significant predictors, IPT Coordination (Estimate = .23), IPT Effort (Estimate = -.40), and IPT Cohesion (Estimate = .24). Military managers should first assess whether or not their organizational systems are conducive to hosting IPTs and whether or not their organizations contain the necessary resources for hosting IPTs. Future researchers should employ a larger sample and a qualitative study to observe team interactions for identifying characteristics of teams and team members. Keywords: commercial cost reduction programs, integrated product teams, military, team performance, program success, integrated product and process development.