贮藏温度对犬肠漏压影响的离体比较。

D. Duffy, Yi-Jen Chang, J. Balko, G. Moore
{"title":"贮藏温度对犬肠漏压影响的离体比较。","authors":"D. Duffy, Yi-Jen Chang, J. Balko, G. Moore","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the effect of storage temperature on cadaveric small intestinal leakage pressures after enterotomy.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nExperimental ex vivo study.\n\n\nANIMALS\nGrossly normal jejunal segments from four canine cadavers.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThirty-six jejunal segments (n = 12 segments/group) were harvested immediately after euthanasia and assigned to a fresh group (tested within 4 hours), chilled group (stored for 24 hours at 4°C before testing), or freeze-thaw group (frozen at -20°C for 7 days and thawed at 21°C for 6 hours before testing). A 2-cm antimesenteric enterotomy was performed and repaired with 4-0 monofilament suture in a simple-continuous pattern. Initial leakage pressure (ILP), maximal intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were recorded, with testing performed at room temperature.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMean ± SD ILP for fresh, chilled, and frozen-thawed specimens was 52.9 ± 8.4, 51.8 ± 11.9 and 29.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg, respectively. There was a difference in ILP among groups (P < .003), with freeze-thaw samples demonstrating lower ILP compared with other groups. There was no difference in MIP between groups (P = .186) There was a difference in leakage location among groups (P = .004), with the majority of chilled and freeze-thaw samples leaking at the suture holes compared with the incisional line in fresh samples.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFreezing and subsequent thawing prior to specimen testing reduced ILP compared with use of fresh and chilled specimens but did not affect MIP among experimental groups.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nCadaveric canine intestinal specimens tested immediately after collection or after chilling for 24 hours should be recommended for ex vivo burst pressure assessment in dogs. Additional studies to evaluate loss in testing viability of chilled intestinal specimens are warranted to help govern experimental methodologies.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ex vivo comparison of the effect of storage temperature on canine intestinal leakage pressures.\",\"authors\":\"D. Duffy, Yi-Jen Chang, J. Balko, G. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.13339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo determine the effect of storage temperature on cadaveric small intestinal leakage pressures after enterotomy.\\n\\n\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\nExperimental ex vivo study.\\n\\n\\nANIMALS\\nGrossly normal jejunal segments from four canine cadavers.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThirty-six jejunal segments (n = 12 segments/group) were harvested immediately after euthanasia and assigned to a fresh group (tested within 4 hours), chilled group (stored for 24 hours at 4°C before testing), or freeze-thaw group (frozen at -20°C for 7 days and thawed at 21°C for 6 hours before testing). A 2-cm antimesenteric enterotomy was performed and repaired with 4-0 monofilament suture in a simple-continuous pattern. Initial leakage pressure (ILP), maximal intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were recorded, with testing performed at room temperature.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nMean ± SD ILP for fresh, chilled, and frozen-thawed specimens was 52.9 ± 8.4, 51.8 ± 11.9 and 29.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg, respectively. There was a difference in ILP among groups (P < .003), with freeze-thaw samples demonstrating lower ILP compared with other groups. There was no difference in MIP between groups (P = .186) There was a difference in leakage location among groups (P = .004), with the majority of chilled and freeze-thaw samples leaking at the suture holes compared with the incisional line in fresh samples.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nFreezing and subsequent thawing prior to specimen testing reduced ILP compared with use of fresh and chilled specimens but did not affect MIP among experimental groups.\\n\\n\\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\\nCadaveric canine intestinal specimens tested immediately after collection or after chilling for 24 hours should be recommended for ex vivo burst pressure assessment in dogs. Additional studies to evaluate loss in testing viability of chilled intestinal specimens are warranted to help govern experimental methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary surgery : VS\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary surgery : VS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

目的探讨保存温度对开肠后尸体小肠漏压的影响。研究设计:实验性离体研究。动物:四具犬类尸体的大体正常空肠部分。方法在安乐死后立即采集36个空肠节段(n = 12节/组),分为新鲜组(4小时内检测)、冷冻组(4℃保存24小时后检测)和冻融组(-20℃冷冻7天,21℃解冻6小时后检测)。行2cm的反肠梗阻肠切开术,并以4-0单丝缝合进行简单-连续模式修复。记录初始泄漏压力(ILP)、最大腔内压力(MIP)和泄漏位置,并在室温下进行测试。结果新鲜、冷冻和冻解标本的平均±SD ILP分别为52.9±8.4、51.8±11.9和29.8±4.4 mm Hg。各组间ILP差异有统计学意义(P < 0.003),冻融样品ILP较其他组低。两组间MIP差异无统计学意义(P = 0.186),两组间渗漏位置差异有统计学意义(P = 0.004),冷冻和冻融标本在缝合孔处渗漏较多,而新鲜标本在切口线处渗漏较少。结论与使用新鲜和冷冻标本相比,在标本检测前进行冷冻和随后的解冻可降低ILP,但不影响实验组的MIP。临床意义:建议犬肠标本采集后立即检测或冷却24小时后立即检测,用于犬离体破裂压力评估。有必要进行进一步的研究,以评估冷冻肠道标本在测试活力方面的损失,以帮助管理实验方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ex vivo comparison of the effect of storage temperature on canine intestinal leakage pressures.
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of storage temperature on cadaveric small intestinal leakage pressures after enterotomy. STUDY DESIGN Experimental ex vivo study. ANIMALS Grossly normal jejunal segments from four canine cadavers. METHODS Thirty-six jejunal segments (n = 12 segments/group) were harvested immediately after euthanasia and assigned to a fresh group (tested within 4 hours), chilled group (stored for 24 hours at 4°C before testing), or freeze-thaw group (frozen at -20°C for 7 days and thawed at 21°C for 6 hours before testing). A 2-cm antimesenteric enterotomy was performed and repaired with 4-0 monofilament suture in a simple-continuous pattern. Initial leakage pressure (ILP), maximal intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were recorded, with testing performed at room temperature. RESULTS Mean ± SD ILP for fresh, chilled, and frozen-thawed specimens was 52.9 ± 8.4, 51.8 ± 11.9 and 29.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg, respectively. There was a difference in ILP among groups (P < .003), with freeze-thaw samples demonstrating lower ILP compared with other groups. There was no difference in MIP between groups (P = .186) There was a difference in leakage location among groups (P = .004), with the majority of chilled and freeze-thaw samples leaking at the suture holes compared with the incisional line in fresh samples. CONCLUSION Freezing and subsequent thawing prior to specimen testing reduced ILP compared with use of fresh and chilled specimens but did not affect MIP among experimental groups. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Cadaveric canine intestinal specimens tested immediately after collection or after chilling for 24 hours should be recommended for ex vivo burst pressure assessment in dogs. Additional studies to evaluate loss in testing viability of chilled intestinal specimens are warranted to help govern experimental methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信