重新平衡土木工程教育,以解决可持续发展的社会问题

Xiaomei Wang, Andrew J. South, W. Guthrie, C. Farnsworth
{"title":"重新平衡土木工程教育,以解决可持续发展的社会问题","authors":"Xiaomei Wang, Andrew J. South, W. Guthrie, C. Farnsworth","doi":"10.1109/ietc54973.2022.9796742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civil engineering students learn to analyze, design, and build to meet the needs of human society, which is dynamic in nature. The concept of a more sustainable and resilient human-centered development resonates with many people and has caused a global shift of focus to a three-part sustainability concept incorporating economic, social, and environmental aspects. Are civil engineering students educated on those significant movements? A structured literature search is performed to examine current research on the topic of integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula. This paper reports that environmental aspects of sustainability in civil engineering education are noted twice as frequently as the social and economic aspects of sustainability. Evidence suggests that economic aspects, while noted less frequently, are embedded in current engineering decision-making practices. However, there are no consistent metrics for including and evaluating social aspects into civil engineering education in analysis, design, and construction. This unbalanced approach will continue to undermine future civil engineers and their impacts in the built environment. This paper argues for changes in the ways sustainability, and in particular social aspects, are included within civil engineering curricula.","PeriodicalId":251518,"journal":{"name":"2022 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rebalancing Civil Engineering Education to Address Social Aspects of Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomei Wang, Andrew J. South, W. Guthrie, C. Farnsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ietc54973.2022.9796742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Civil engineering students learn to analyze, design, and build to meet the needs of human society, which is dynamic in nature. The concept of a more sustainable and resilient human-centered development resonates with many people and has caused a global shift of focus to a three-part sustainability concept incorporating economic, social, and environmental aspects. Are civil engineering students educated on those significant movements? A structured literature search is performed to examine current research on the topic of integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula. This paper reports that environmental aspects of sustainability in civil engineering education are noted twice as frequently as the social and economic aspects of sustainability. Evidence suggests that economic aspects, while noted less frequently, are embedded in current engineering decision-making practices. However, there are no consistent metrics for including and evaluating social aspects into civil engineering education in analysis, design, and construction. This unbalanced approach will continue to undermine future civil engineers and their impacts in the built environment. This paper argues for changes in the ways sustainability, and in particular social aspects, are included within civil engineering curricula.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ietc54973.2022.9796742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ietc54973.2022.9796742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土木工程专业的学生学习分析、设计和建造,以满足人类社会的需求,这是动态的性质。更可持续和更有弹性的以人为中心的发展概念引起了许多人的共鸣,并导致全球将重点转移到经济、社会和环境三方面的可持续发展概念。土木工程专业的学生学习过这些重要的运动吗?进行结构化的文献检索,以检查将可持续性纳入土木工程课程的主题的当前研究。本文报告指出,土木工程教育中可持续性的环境方面是可持续性的社会和经济方面的两倍。有证据表明,经济方面虽然不太经常被注意到,但已经嵌入到当前的工程决策实践中。然而,在分析、设计和施工的土木工程教育中,没有一致的标准来包括和评估社会方面。这种不平衡的方法将继续削弱未来的土木工程师及其对建筑环境的影响。本文主张改变可持续性的方式,特别是社会方面,包括在土木工程课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rebalancing Civil Engineering Education to Address Social Aspects of Sustainability
Civil engineering students learn to analyze, design, and build to meet the needs of human society, which is dynamic in nature. The concept of a more sustainable and resilient human-centered development resonates with many people and has caused a global shift of focus to a three-part sustainability concept incorporating economic, social, and environmental aspects. Are civil engineering students educated on those significant movements? A structured literature search is performed to examine current research on the topic of integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula. This paper reports that environmental aspects of sustainability in civil engineering education are noted twice as frequently as the social and economic aspects of sustainability. Evidence suggests that economic aspects, while noted less frequently, are embedded in current engineering decision-making practices. However, there are no consistent metrics for including and evaluating social aspects into civil engineering education in analysis, design, and construction. This unbalanced approach will continue to undermine future civil engineers and their impacts in the built environment. This paper argues for changes in the ways sustainability, and in particular social aspects, are included within civil engineering curricula.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信