行政权力的滥用:超越路灯效应

D. Bernstein
{"title":"行政权力的滥用:超越路灯效应","authors":"D. Bernstein","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.11.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While administrative law scholarship continues to focus on Chevron and related doctrines of judicial deference, the executive branch is increasingly undertaking significant but illegal, or at least extra-legal, actions that seem to leave little if any scope for judicial review, even if the Supreme Court desired to be far more aggressive about policing executive action. In this Article, I discuss several categories of such actions, while providing examples from the Obama administration. Part I discusses regulations disguised as “guidance,” with specific reference to the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights’ “Dear Colleague” letter regarding sexual assault on campus. Part II discusses measures taken during an economic emergency despite an absence of statutory authority for those measures, with specific reference to the government officials surreptitiously making day-to-day decisions for General Motors after the 2008 financial crisis. Finally, Part III discusses the refusal to implement existing law, with specific reference to the Obama administration’s delays and postponements in enforcing various provisions of the Affordable Care Act.","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Abuse of Executive Power: Getting Beyond the Streetlight Effect\",\"authors\":\"D. Bernstein\",\"doi\":\"10.25148/LAWREV.11.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While administrative law scholarship continues to focus on Chevron and related doctrines of judicial deference, the executive branch is increasingly undertaking significant but illegal, or at least extra-legal, actions that seem to leave little if any scope for judicial review, even if the Supreme Court desired to be far more aggressive about policing executive action. In this Article, I discuss several categories of such actions, while providing examples from the Obama administration. Part I discusses regulations disguised as “guidance,” with specific reference to the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights’ “Dear Colleague” letter regarding sexual assault on campus. Part II discusses measures taken during an economic emergency despite an absence of statutory authority for those measures, with specific reference to the government officials surreptitiously making day-to-day decisions for General Motors after the 2008 financial crisis. Finally, Part III discusses the refusal to implement existing law, with specific reference to the Obama administration’s delays and postponements in enforcing various provisions of the Affordable Care Act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FIU Law Review\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FIU Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.11.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIU Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.11.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当行政法学者继续关注雪佛龙和相关的司法服从理论时,行政部门正在越来越多地采取重大但非法的,或至少是法外的行动,这些行动似乎几乎没有留下任何司法审查的余地,即使最高法院希望对行政行为进行更积极的监督。在本文中,我将讨论这类行动的几个类别,同时提供奥巴马政府的例子。第一部分讨论了伪装成“指导”的规定,特别提到了美国教育部民权办公室关于校园性侵犯的“亲爱的同事”信。第二部分讨论了在经济紧急情况下采取的措施,尽管这些措施没有法定权力,具体提到了政府官员在2008年金融危机后秘密地为通用汽车公司(General Motors)做日常决策。最后,第三部分讨论了拒绝执行现有法律,具体提到奥巴马政府在执行《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)的各项条款方面的拖延和推迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Abuse of Executive Power: Getting Beyond the Streetlight Effect
While administrative law scholarship continues to focus on Chevron and related doctrines of judicial deference, the executive branch is increasingly undertaking significant but illegal, or at least extra-legal, actions that seem to leave little if any scope for judicial review, even if the Supreme Court desired to be far more aggressive about policing executive action. In this Article, I discuss several categories of such actions, while providing examples from the Obama administration. Part I discusses regulations disguised as “guidance,” with specific reference to the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights’ “Dear Colleague” letter regarding sexual assault on campus. Part II discusses measures taken during an economic emergency despite an absence of statutory authority for those measures, with specific reference to the government officials surreptitiously making day-to-day decisions for General Motors after the 2008 financial crisis. Finally, Part III discusses the refusal to implement existing law, with specific reference to the Obama administration’s delays and postponements in enforcing various provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信