利用专家模型提取讽刺推文

Nagamani Yeruva, Sarada Venna, Hemalatha Indukuri, Mounika Marreddy
{"title":"利用专家模型提取讽刺推文","authors":"Nagamani Yeruva, Sarada Venna, Hemalatha Indukuri, Mounika Marreddy","doi":"10.1145/3574318.3574331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posts on Twitter allow users to express ideas and opinions very dynamically. This high volume of data provides relevant clues about the public judgment on a specific product, event, service, etc. While traditional sentiment analysis primarily focuses on classifying the sentiment in general (positive or negative) or at an aspect level (very positive, low negative, and so on) and cannot exploit the intensity information. Recently, the problem of irony detection in social media has been proven to be pervasive among research enthusiasts, posing a challenge to sentiment analysis systems. Moreover, the figurative use of language has received scarce attention from the computational linguistic research point of view. This paper proposes an architecture, the Experts Model, inspired by the standard Mixture of Experts (MoE) model. The key idea here is that each expert learns different sets of features from the feature vector, which helps in better irony detection (Ironic vs. Non-ironic - SemEval-2018 subtask A) and ironic type detection (Verbal irony with vs. without polarity contrast vs. Situational irony vs. Non-irony - SemEval-2018 subtask B) from the tweet. We compared our Experts Model’s results with baseline results along with the top five performers of SemEval-2018 Task-3, Ironic detection. The experimental results show that our proposed approach deals with the ironic detection problem and stands at the top-3 results. We opted for a transfer learning approach by applying our proposed model on three different datasets #ironic, #sarcasm, and #humor, and we achieved a better F1-score.","PeriodicalId":270700,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracting Ironic Tweets using Experts Model\",\"authors\":\"Nagamani Yeruva, Sarada Venna, Hemalatha Indukuri, Mounika Marreddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3574318.3574331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Posts on Twitter allow users to express ideas and opinions very dynamically. This high volume of data provides relevant clues about the public judgment on a specific product, event, service, etc. While traditional sentiment analysis primarily focuses on classifying the sentiment in general (positive or negative) or at an aspect level (very positive, low negative, and so on) and cannot exploit the intensity information. Recently, the problem of irony detection in social media has been proven to be pervasive among research enthusiasts, posing a challenge to sentiment analysis systems. Moreover, the figurative use of language has received scarce attention from the computational linguistic research point of view. This paper proposes an architecture, the Experts Model, inspired by the standard Mixture of Experts (MoE) model. The key idea here is that each expert learns different sets of features from the feature vector, which helps in better irony detection (Ironic vs. Non-ironic - SemEval-2018 subtask A) and ironic type detection (Verbal irony with vs. without polarity contrast vs. Situational irony vs. Non-irony - SemEval-2018 subtask B) from the tweet. We compared our Experts Model’s results with baseline results along with the top five performers of SemEval-2018 Task-3, Ironic detection. The experimental results show that our proposed approach deals with the ironic detection problem and stands at the top-3 results. We opted for a transfer learning approach by applying our proposed model on three different datasets #ironic, #sarcasm, and #humor, and we achieved a better F1-score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3574318.3574331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3574318.3574331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Twitter上的帖子允许用户非常动态地表达想法和观点。大量的数据为公众对特定产品、事件、服务等的判断提供了相关线索。而传统的情感分析主要侧重于对情感进行总体(积极或消极)或层面(非常积极、低消极等)的分类,无法利用情感的强度信息。最近,社交媒体中的反讽检测问题在研究爱好者中被证明是普遍存在的,这对情感分析系统提出了挑战。此外,从计算语言学研究的角度来看,语言的比喻使用很少受到关注。本文从标准的专家混合模型(MoE)中得到启发,提出了一种专家模型体系结构。这里的关键思想是,每个专家从特征向量中学习不同的特征集,这有助于更好地从推特中检测讽刺(讽刺与非讽刺- SemEval-2018子任务A)和讽刺类型检测(带有极性对比的言语讽刺与不带有极性对比的情景讽刺与非讽刺- SemEval-2018子任务B)。我们将专家模型的结果与基线结果以及SemEval-2018任务3(讽刺检测)的前五名表演者进行了比较。实验结果表明,我们提出的方法处理了反语检测问题,结果排名前3位。我们选择了一种迁移学习方法,将我们提出的模型应用于三个不同的数据集# irony, #sarcasm和#humor,我们获得了更好的f1分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracting Ironic Tweets using Experts Model
Posts on Twitter allow users to express ideas and opinions very dynamically. This high volume of data provides relevant clues about the public judgment on a specific product, event, service, etc. While traditional sentiment analysis primarily focuses on classifying the sentiment in general (positive or negative) or at an aspect level (very positive, low negative, and so on) and cannot exploit the intensity information. Recently, the problem of irony detection in social media has been proven to be pervasive among research enthusiasts, posing a challenge to sentiment analysis systems. Moreover, the figurative use of language has received scarce attention from the computational linguistic research point of view. This paper proposes an architecture, the Experts Model, inspired by the standard Mixture of Experts (MoE) model. The key idea here is that each expert learns different sets of features from the feature vector, which helps in better irony detection (Ironic vs. Non-ironic - SemEval-2018 subtask A) and ironic type detection (Verbal irony with vs. without polarity contrast vs. Situational irony vs. Non-irony - SemEval-2018 subtask B) from the tweet. We compared our Experts Model’s results with baseline results along with the top five performers of SemEval-2018 Task-3, Ironic detection. The experimental results show that our proposed approach deals with the ironic detection problem and stands at the top-3 results. We opted for a transfer learning approach by applying our proposed model on three different datasets #ironic, #sarcasm, and #humor, and we achieved a better F1-score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信