通过他们的成果,你应该了解他们:一个数据分析师对大规模并行系统设计的看法

H. Pirk, S. Madden, M. Stonebraker
{"title":"通过他们的成果,你应该了解他们:一个数据分析师对大规模并行系统设计的看法","authors":"H. Pirk, S. Madden, M. Stonebraker","doi":"10.1145/2771937.2771944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly parallel systems promise a remedy for the current stagnation of single-core performance. However, the battle to find the most appropriate architecture for the resulting massively parallel systems is still ongoing. Currently, there are two active contenders: Massively Parallel Single Instruction Multiple Threads (SIMT) systems such as GPGPUs and Many Core Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) systems such as Intel's Xeon Phi. While the former is more versatile, the latter is an efficient, time-tested technology with a clear migration path. In this study, we provide a data management perspective to the debate: we study the implementation and performance of a set of common data management operations on an SIMT device (an Nvidia GTX 780) and compare it to a Many Core SIMD system (an Intel Xeon Phi). We interpret the results to pinpoint architectural decisions and tradeoffs that lead to suboptimal performance and point out potential areas for improvement in the next generation of these devices.","PeriodicalId":267524,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"By their fruits shall ye know them: A Data Analyst's Perspective on Massively Parallel System Design\",\"authors\":\"H. Pirk, S. Madden, M. Stonebraker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2771937.2771944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly parallel systems promise a remedy for the current stagnation of single-core performance. However, the battle to find the most appropriate architecture for the resulting massively parallel systems is still ongoing. Currently, there are two active contenders: Massively Parallel Single Instruction Multiple Threads (SIMT) systems such as GPGPUs and Many Core Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) systems such as Intel's Xeon Phi. While the former is more versatile, the latter is an efficient, time-tested technology with a clear migration path. In this study, we provide a data management perspective to the debate: we study the implementation and performance of a set of common data management operations on an SIMT device (an Nvidia GTX 780) and compare it to a Many Core SIMD system (an Intel Xeon Phi). We interpret the results to pinpoint architectural decisions and tradeoffs that lead to suboptimal performance and point out potential areas for improvement in the next generation of these devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2771937.2771944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2771937.2771944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

越来越多的并行系统有望解决当前单核性能停滞的问题。然而,为由此产生的大规模并行系统寻找最合适的架构的战斗仍在进行中。目前,有两个活跃的竞争者:大规模并行单指令多线程(SIMT)系统,如gpgpu和多核单指令多数据(SIMD)系统,如英特尔的Xeon Phi。前者更通用,而后者是一种高效的、经过时间考验的技术,具有明确的迁移路径。在本研究中,我们为争论提供了一个数据管理的视角:我们研究了SIMT设备(Nvidia GTX 780)上一组常见数据管理操作的实现和性能,并将其与多核SIMD系统(Intel Xeon Phi)进行了比较。我们对结果进行了解释,以查明导致性能次优的架构决策和权衡,并指出下一代这些设备中有待改进的潜在领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
By their fruits shall ye know them: A Data Analyst's Perspective on Massively Parallel System Design
Increasingly parallel systems promise a remedy for the current stagnation of single-core performance. However, the battle to find the most appropriate architecture for the resulting massively parallel systems is still ongoing. Currently, there are two active contenders: Massively Parallel Single Instruction Multiple Threads (SIMT) systems such as GPGPUs and Many Core Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) systems such as Intel's Xeon Phi. While the former is more versatile, the latter is an efficient, time-tested technology with a clear migration path. In this study, we provide a data management perspective to the debate: we study the implementation and performance of a set of common data management operations on an SIMT device (an Nvidia GTX 780) and compare it to a Many Core SIMD system (an Intel Xeon Phi). We interpret the results to pinpoint architectural decisions and tradeoffs that lead to suboptimal performance and point out potential areas for improvement in the next generation of these devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信