基于点云和stl的五轴增量板料成形刀具路径策略的数值比较研究

Ayushi Gupta, A. Nagargoje, A. Dubey, P. Tandon
{"title":"基于点云和stl的五轴增量板料成形刀具路径策略的数值比较研究","authors":"Ayushi Gupta, A. Nagargoje, A. Dubey, P. Tandon","doi":"10.1115/imece2022-94589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To address the difficulties faced by the existing 3-axis incremental sheet forming (ISF) processes, toolpaths of 5-axis incremental sheet forming were developed to form the components with features having forming angles greater than 90°. This paper compares the STL and point cloud-based methodologies for the toolpaths generated for 5 axes incremental sheet forming. The STL models are used in the existing 5-axis toolpath techniques to determine the point normal at a contact point and hence the tool posture angles. However, there are several drawbacks associated with this approach of using STL models. Thus, a point cloud-based posture calculation strategy is proposed in this work. It was observed that the proposed approach performs better than the STL-based strategy in terms of computing efficiency. Numerical simulations were performed to validate the approach utilizing the toolpaths generated by both strategies. The simulation of the ISF process was performed to determine the feasibility of the 5-axis incremental sheet forming toolpath. Finite element simulations were performed using the shell elements for the geometry with the curvature of the wall greater than 90°. Results based on geometrical accuracy are compared to understand the differences between the two strategies.","PeriodicalId":113474,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Numerical Investigation to Compare Point Cloud and STL-Based Toolpath Strategies for 5-Axis Incremental Sheet Forming\",\"authors\":\"Ayushi Gupta, A. Nagargoje, A. Dubey, P. Tandon\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2022-94589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To address the difficulties faced by the existing 3-axis incremental sheet forming (ISF) processes, toolpaths of 5-axis incremental sheet forming were developed to form the components with features having forming angles greater than 90°. This paper compares the STL and point cloud-based methodologies for the toolpaths generated for 5 axes incremental sheet forming. The STL models are used in the existing 5-axis toolpath techniques to determine the point normal at a contact point and hence the tool posture angles. However, there are several drawbacks associated with this approach of using STL models. Thus, a point cloud-based posture calculation strategy is proposed in this work. It was observed that the proposed approach performs better than the STL-based strategy in terms of computing efficiency. Numerical simulations were performed to validate the approach utilizing the toolpaths generated by both strategies. The simulation of the ISF process was performed to determine the feasibility of the 5-axis incremental sheet forming toolpath. Finite element simulations were performed using the shell elements for the geometry with the curvature of the wall greater than 90°. Results based on geometrical accuracy are compared to understand the differences between the two strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-94589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-94589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对现有三轴增量板成形(ISF)工艺所面临的困难,开发了五轴增量板成形的刀具路径,用于成形角度大于90°的零件。本文比较了STL和基于点云的方法为5轴增量板料成形生成的工具路径。STL模型用于现有的5轴刀具路径技术,以确定接触点的点法线,从而确定刀具姿态角。然而,这种使用STL模型的方法有几个缺点。因此,本文提出了一种基于点云的姿态计算策略。结果表明,该方法在计算效率方面优于基于stl的策略。利用两种策略生成的刀具路径进行了数值仿真,验证了该方法的有效性。通过对成形过程的仿真,确定了5轴增量板料成形刀具路径的可行性。采用壳单元对壁面曲率大于90°的几何形状进行有限元模拟。基于几何精度的结果进行比较,以了解两种策略之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Numerical Investigation to Compare Point Cloud and STL-Based Toolpath Strategies for 5-Axis Incremental Sheet Forming
To address the difficulties faced by the existing 3-axis incremental sheet forming (ISF) processes, toolpaths of 5-axis incremental sheet forming were developed to form the components with features having forming angles greater than 90°. This paper compares the STL and point cloud-based methodologies for the toolpaths generated for 5 axes incremental sheet forming. The STL models are used in the existing 5-axis toolpath techniques to determine the point normal at a contact point and hence the tool posture angles. However, there are several drawbacks associated with this approach of using STL models. Thus, a point cloud-based posture calculation strategy is proposed in this work. It was observed that the proposed approach performs better than the STL-based strategy in terms of computing efficiency. Numerical simulations were performed to validate the approach utilizing the toolpaths generated by both strategies. The simulation of the ISF process was performed to determine the feasibility of the 5-axis incremental sheet forming toolpath. Finite element simulations were performed using the shell elements for the geometry with the curvature of the wall greater than 90°. Results based on geometrical accuracy are compared to understand the differences between the two strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信