面向方面的场景模型中的功能交互

G. Mussbacher, Daniel Amyot, T. Weigert, T. Cottenier
{"title":"面向方面的场景模型中的功能交互","authors":"G. Mussbacher, Daniel Amyot, T. Weigert, T. Cottenier","doi":"10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ideally, a feature interaction (FI) approach for scenario models should require minimal additional specification effort and allow for incremental definition of new scenarios. Furthermore, the scenario specification model and the validation model should be clearly separated. The specification model comprises the intrinsic behavioral and structural properties of the application under consideration, while the validation model consists of any additional information required for ensuring compliance with the feature specifications. The usage of preand postconditions in scenario models is one lightweight approach for detecting, modeling, and resolving FIs. It requires low effort, allows for incremental development, and if properly structured, allows for separation of the scenario and validation models. Aspect-oriented modeling techniques, however, add further requirements, as aspectual scenarios should remain independent from each other even if FIs are present. We present a specification and validation framework that satisfies the above-mentioned goals and assess its aspect-oriented scenario notation, Aspectoriented Use Case Maps, against these goals based on a radio software case study.","PeriodicalId":382411,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feature Interactions in Aspect-Oriented Scenario Models\",\"authors\":\"G. Mussbacher, Daniel Amyot, T. Weigert, T. Cottenier\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ideally, a feature interaction (FI) approach for scenario models should require minimal additional specification effort and allow for incremental definition of new scenarios. Furthermore, the scenario specification model and the validation model should be clearly separated. The specification model comprises the intrinsic behavioral and structural properties of the application under consideration, while the validation model consists of any additional information required for ensuring compliance with the feature specifications. The usage of preand postconditions in scenario models is one lightweight approach for detecting, modeling, and resolving FIs. It requires low effort, allows for incremental development, and if properly structured, allows for separation of the scenario and validation models. Aspect-oriented modeling techniques, however, add further requirements, as aspectual scenarios should remain independent from each other even if FIs are present. We present a specification and validation framework that satisfies the above-mentioned goals and assess its aspect-oriented scenario notation, Aspectoriented Use Case Maps, against these goals based on a radio software case study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

理想情况下,场景模型的功能交互(FI)方法应该需要最少的额外规范工作,并允许新场景的增量定义。此外,场景规范模型和验证模型应该清楚地分开。规范模型包含所考虑的应用程序的内在行为和结构属性,而验证模型包含确保符合特性规范所需的任何附加信息。在场景模型中使用前置和后置条件是检测、建模和解决fi的一种轻量级方法。它需要低工作量,允许增量开发,并且如果结构适当,允许分离场景和验证模型。然而,面向方面的建模技术增加了进一步的需求,因为即使存在fi,方面场景也应该保持彼此独立。我们提出了一个满足上述目标的规范和验证框架,并根据基于无线电软件案例研究的这些目标评估其面向方面的场景表示法,面向方面的用例图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feature Interactions in Aspect-Oriented Scenario Models
Ideally, a feature interaction (FI) approach for scenario models should require minimal additional specification effort and allow for incremental definition of new scenarios. Furthermore, the scenario specification model and the validation model should be clearly separated. The specification model comprises the intrinsic behavioral and structural properties of the application under consideration, while the validation model consists of any additional information required for ensuring compliance with the feature specifications. The usage of preand postconditions in scenario models is one lightweight approach for detecting, modeling, and resolving FIs. It requires low effort, allows for incremental development, and if properly structured, allows for separation of the scenario and validation models. Aspect-oriented modeling techniques, however, add further requirements, as aspectual scenarios should remain independent from each other even if FIs are present. We present a specification and validation framework that satisfies the above-mentioned goals and assess its aspect-oriented scenario notation, Aspectoriented Use Case Maps, against these goals based on a radio software case study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信