基于capm的贝塔和下行贝塔研究——以卡拉奇证券交易所为例

M. Tahir, Qaiser Abbas, Shahid Mehmood Sargana, Usman Ayub, Syed Kashif Saeed
{"title":"基于capm的贝塔和下行贝塔研究——以卡拉奇证券交易所为例","authors":"M. Tahir, Qaiser Abbas, Shahid Mehmood Sargana, Usman Ayub, Syed Kashif Saeed","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2241416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharpe’s (1964) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumes that the relationship between risk and return is positive, linear and significant. However, it is not free from controversies and one of them advocates replacing CAPM’s beta by downside beta based on investors’ preference of downside risk. Roy (1952) debates that investor care for downside risk and Hogan and Warren (1974) replace variance with semivariance in CAPM as the first official version of downside risk based CAPM. Bawa (1975), Fishburn (1977) and Bawa and Lindenberg (1977) develop and extend proxy for downside risk/beta as Lower Partial Moment. This study empirically tests beta and downside beta based CAPM (DCAPM). Conceptual and empirical problems related in testing alternative models are discussed with adoption of Fama-MacBeth (1973) procedure by making it robust. This study inspects intercept, risk-return relationship, nonlinearities and effect of residuals for both CAPM and DCAPM. Intercept results are almost similar and they follow introduction of zero-beta models as outlined by Black et al. (1972). Both models show rejection of nonlinearities and effect of residuals. However, DCAPM comes out to be strong contender compared to CAPM for risk-return relationship. These results are consistent with Estrada (2002), Ang et al.(2004) and Post and Vliet (2004).","PeriodicalId":287077,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Investigation of Beta and Downside Beta Based CAPM-Case Study of Karachi Stock Exchange\",\"authors\":\"M. Tahir, Qaiser Abbas, Shahid Mehmood Sargana, Usman Ayub, Syed Kashif Saeed\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2241416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sharpe’s (1964) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumes that the relationship between risk and return is positive, linear and significant. However, it is not free from controversies and one of them advocates replacing CAPM’s beta by downside beta based on investors’ preference of downside risk. Roy (1952) debates that investor care for downside risk and Hogan and Warren (1974) replace variance with semivariance in CAPM as the first official version of downside risk based CAPM. Bawa (1975), Fishburn (1977) and Bawa and Lindenberg (1977) develop and extend proxy for downside risk/beta as Lower Partial Moment. This study empirically tests beta and downside beta based CAPM (DCAPM). Conceptual and empirical problems related in testing alternative models are discussed with adoption of Fama-MacBeth (1973) procedure by making it robust. This study inspects intercept, risk-return relationship, nonlinearities and effect of residuals for both CAPM and DCAPM. Intercept results are almost similar and they follow introduction of zero-beta models as outlined by Black et al. (1972). Both models show rejection of nonlinearities and effect of residuals. However, DCAPM comes out to be strong contender compared to CAPM for risk-return relationship. These results are consistent with Estrada (2002), Ang et al.(2004) and Post and Vliet (2004).\",\"PeriodicalId\":287077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

Sharpe(1964)的资本资产定价模型(Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM)假设风险与收益之间的关系是正的、线性的、显著的。然而,也并非没有争议,其中一种观点主张基于投资者对下行风险的偏好,将CAPM的贝塔替换为下行贝塔。Roy(1952)认为投资者关心的是下行风险,Hogan和Warren(1974)将CAPM中的方差替换为半方差,作为基于下行风险的CAPM的第一个正式版本。Bawa (1975), Fishburn(1977)和Bawa和Lindenberg(1977)发展并扩展了下行风险/beta的代理作为Lower Partial Moment。本研究实证检验了基于beta和下行beta的CAPM (DCAPM)。通过使Fama-MacBeth(1973)程序具有鲁棒性,讨论了与测试替代模型相关的概念和经验问题。本研究检验了CAPM和DCAPM的截距、风险收益关系、非线性和残差效应。截距结果几乎相似,它们遵循Black等人(1972)概述的零beta模型的引入。两种模型均具有良好的非线性抑制和残差效应。然而,在风险收益关系方面,DCAPM比CAPM更具竞争力。这些结果与Estrada(2002)、Ang等人(2004)以及Post和Vliet(2004)的研究结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Investigation of Beta and Downside Beta Based CAPM-Case Study of Karachi Stock Exchange
Sharpe’s (1964) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumes that the relationship between risk and return is positive, linear and significant. However, it is not free from controversies and one of them advocates replacing CAPM’s beta by downside beta based on investors’ preference of downside risk. Roy (1952) debates that investor care for downside risk and Hogan and Warren (1974) replace variance with semivariance in CAPM as the first official version of downside risk based CAPM. Bawa (1975), Fishburn (1977) and Bawa and Lindenberg (1977) develop and extend proxy for downside risk/beta as Lower Partial Moment. This study empirically tests beta and downside beta based CAPM (DCAPM). Conceptual and empirical problems related in testing alternative models are discussed with adoption of Fama-MacBeth (1973) procedure by making it robust. This study inspects intercept, risk-return relationship, nonlinearities and effect of residuals for both CAPM and DCAPM. Intercept results are almost similar and they follow introduction of zero-beta models as outlined by Black et al. (1972). Both models show rejection of nonlinearities and effect of residuals. However, DCAPM comes out to be strong contender compared to CAPM for risk-return relationship. These results are consistent with Estrada (2002), Ang et al.(2004) and Post and Vliet (2004).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信