{"title":"把鼻子贴在匍匐的地方","authors":"Nur Najihah Aula Binti Tajul Ashikin","doi":"10.22373/ijomafim.v1i2.2771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government has implemented health protocols to limit the spread of Covid-19, including wearing masks. However, problems arise when wearing a mask while praying. According to the Ḥanbalī school of thought, this prayer is invalid. On the other hand, according to the ulemas of the al-Syafi'ī school, prayers are still valid even if a mask is covered the nose. The author is interested in examining the opinions and methods of these two schools with a comparative legal approach. The authors found that most ulemas of Ḥanbalī schools stated that the nose is a part of the body that must be attached to the place of prostration in prayer. The ulemas of the al-Syafi'i school state that only the forehead must touch the place of prostration, while the nose is only a suggestion. The ulemas of both schools use linguistic (lughawiyyah) and causation (ta‘līl) methods, but the results are different. It happens because of differences in the editorial hadith used as a source of law. The author concludes that the ulemas of these two schools have such tendencies about different editors' hadiths choosing.","PeriodicalId":304169,"journal":{"name":"IJoMaFiM: Indonesian Journal of Maqasid and Fiqh Muqaran","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ATTACHING NOSE TO THE PLACE OF PROSTRATION\",\"authors\":\"Nur Najihah Aula Binti Tajul Ashikin\",\"doi\":\"10.22373/ijomafim.v1i2.2771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The government has implemented health protocols to limit the spread of Covid-19, including wearing masks. However, problems arise when wearing a mask while praying. According to the Ḥanbalī school of thought, this prayer is invalid. On the other hand, according to the ulemas of the al-Syafi'ī school, prayers are still valid even if a mask is covered the nose. The author is interested in examining the opinions and methods of these two schools with a comparative legal approach. The authors found that most ulemas of Ḥanbalī schools stated that the nose is a part of the body that must be attached to the place of prostration in prayer. The ulemas of the al-Syafi'i school state that only the forehead must touch the place of prostration, while the nose is only a suggestion. The ulemas of both schools use linguistic (lughawiyyah) and causation (ta‘līl) methods, but the results are different. It happens because of differences in the editorial hadith used as a source of law. The author concludes that the ulemas of these two schools have such tendencies about different editors' hadiths choosing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJoMaFiM: Indonesian Journal of Maqasid and Fiqh Muqaran\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJoMaFiM: Indonesian Journal of Maqasid and Fiqh Muqaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22373/ijomafim.v1i2.2771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoMaFiM: Indonesian Journal of Maqasid and Fiqh Muqaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/ijomafim.v1i2.2771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The government has implemented health protocols to limit the spread of Covid-19, including wearing masks. However, problems arise when wearing a mask while praying. According to the Ḥanbalī school of thought, this prayer is invalid. On the other hand, according to the ulemas of the al-Syafi'ī school, prayers are still valid even if a mask is covered the nose. The author is interested in examining the opinions and methods of these two schools with a comparative legal approach. The authors found that most ulemas of Ḥanbalī schools stated that the nose is a part of the body that must be attached to the place of prostration in prayer. The ulemas of the al-Syafi'i school state that only the forehead must touch the place of prostration, while the nose is only a suggestion. The ulemas of both schools use linguistic (lughawiyyah) and causation (ta‘līl) methods, but the results are different. It happens because of differences in the editorial hadith used as a source of law. The author concludes that the ulemas of these two schools have such tendencies about different editors' hadiths choosing.