{"title":"三种黏合剂系统的纳米泄漏评估:体外研究","authors":"I. Basha","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2021.206571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This research evaluates the nanoleakage in Adper single bond 2, Clearfil SE BOND 2, and G-bond plus adhesive systems . Materials and Methods: Forty-five freshly extracted human maxillary premolar were selected for measuring their nanoleakage. The selected teeth were divided into three main groups according to adhesive systems (n=15). Group I: etch and rinse system (Adper single bond 2), group II: self-etch two-step system (Clearfil SE BOND 2), group III: self-etch all in one system (G-bond Plus). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to storage time (n=5) (one day, one month, six months. MOD cavity was prepared with 2.5 depth and 2 mm width and restored with restorative materials before nanoleakage at dentin adhesive interface is measured with a scanning electron microscope . Results: The result of this study revealed that Adper single bond 2 is inferior to Gbond plus then Clearfil SE BOND 2 . Conclusions: Clearfil SE BOND 2 seems to be an efficient adhesive. The storage in water for long periods has a highly significant adverse effect on the nanoleakage.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Nano-leakage for Three Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"I. Basha\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aadj.2021.206571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This research evaluates the nanoleakage in Adper single bond 2, Clearfil SE BOND 2, and G-bond plus adhesive systems . Materials and Methods: Forty-five freshly extracted human maxillary premolar were selected for measuring their nanoleakage. The selected teeth were divided into three main groups according to adhesive systems (n=15). Group I: etch and rinse system (Adper single bond 2), group II: self-etch two-step system (Clearfil SE BOND 2), group III: self-etch all in one system (G-bond Plus). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to storage time (n=5) (one day, one month, six months. MOD cavity was prepared with 2.5 depth and 2 mm width and restored with restorative materials before nanoleakage at dentin adhesive interface is measured with a scanning electron microscope . Results: The result of this study revealed that Adper single bond 2 is inferior to Gbond plus then Clearfil SE BOND 2 . Conclusions: Clearfil SE BOND 2 seems to be an efficient adhesive. The storage in water for long periods has a highly significant adverse effect on the nanoleakage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2021.206571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2021.206571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究Adper单键2、Clearfil SE bond 2和G-bond +胶粘剂体系的纳米泄漏。材料与方法:选择45颗新鲜提取的人上颌前磨牙进行纳米泄漏测定。选择的牙根据粘接剂系统分为三组(n=15)。第一组:蚀刻和冲洗系统(Adper单键2)，第二组:自蚀刻两步系统(Clearfil SE bond 2)，第三组:自蚀刻全在一个系统(G-bond Plus)。每组按保存时间(n=5)分为3个亚组(1天、1个月、6个月)。制备深度为2.5 mm、宽度为2mm的MOD腔体，用修复材料修复后，用扫描电镜测量牙本质黏合剂界面纳米渗漏情况。结果:本研究结果显示，Adper单键2比Gbond加Clearfil SE bond 2更差。结论:Clearfil SE BOND 2是一种高效的胶粘剂。长时间在水中储存对纳米泄漏有非常显著的不利影响。
Assessment of Nano-leakage for Three Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study
Aim: This research evaluates the nanoleakage in Adper single bond 2, Clearfil SE BOND 2, and G-bond plus adhesive systems . Materials and Methods: Forty-five freshly extracted human maxillary premolar were selected for measuring their nanoleakage. The selected teeth were divided into three main groups according to adhesive systems (n=15). Group I: etch and rinse system (Adper single bond 2), group II: self-etch two-step system (Clearfil SE BOND 2), group III: self-etch all in one system (G-bond Plus). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to storage time (n=5) (one day, one month, six months. MOD cavity was prepared with 2.5 depth and 2 mm width and restored with restorative materials before nanoleakage at dentin adhesive interface is measured with a scanning electron microscope . Results: The result of this study revealed that Adper single bond 2 is inferior to Gbond plus then Clearfil SE BOND 2 . Conclusions: Clearfil SE BOND 2 seems to be an efficient adhesive. The storage in water for long periods has a highly significant adverse effect on the nanoleakage.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
