营销订单与品牌推广…有律师

J. Crespi, R. Sexton
{"title":"营销订单与品牌推广…有律师","authors":"J. Crespi, R. Sexton","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.131726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"M any agricultural industries promote their products with funds generated from mandatory contributions by producers and/or handlers. Studies have shown that these programs often yield an excellent rate of return. Nonetheless, these programs have been controversial, and have endured numerous legal attacks on the grounds that they violate participants' First Amendment rights by compelling them to associate with competitors and support advertising messages with which they disagree. Most observers believed that the Supreme Court had ended litigation, at least on First Amendment grounds, by ruling in favor of the marketing programs. However, a November 1999 decision by the u.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals threatens to reignite the debate.","PeriodicalId":185368,"journal":{"name":"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marketing Orders and Brand Promotion...Got Lawyers\",\"authors\":\"J. Crespi, R. Sexton\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.131726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"M any agricultural industries promote their products with funds generated from mandatory contributions by producers and/or handlers. Studies have shown that these programs often yield an excellent rate of return. Nonetheless, these programs have been controversial, and have endured numerous legal attacks on the grounds that they violate participants' First Amendment rights by compelling them to associate with competitors and support advertising messages with which they disagree. Most observers believed that the Supreme Court had ended litigation, at least on First Amendment grounds, by ruling in favor of the marketing programs. However, a November 1999 decision by the u.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals threatens to reignite the debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.131726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.131726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

任何农业产业推广其产品的资金都来自生产者和/或处理者的强制性捐款。研究表明,这些项目通常会产生极好的回报率。尽管如此,这些节目一直存在争议,并遭受了无数的法律攻击,理由是它们侵犯了参与者的第一修正案权利,强迫他们与竞争对手联系,并支持他们不同意的广告信息。大多数观察人士认为,最高法院做出有利于营销计划的裁决,至少在第一修正案的基础上,已经结束了诉讼。然而,1999年11月美国第六巡回上诉法院的一项裁决有可能重新点燃这场辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marketing Orders and Brand Promotion...Got Lawyers
M any agricultural industries promote their products with funds generated from mandatory contributions by producers and/or handlers. Studies have shown that these programs often yield an excellent rate of return. Nonetheless, these programs have been controversial, and have endured numerous legal attacks on the grounds that they violate participants' First Amendment rights by compelling them to associate with competitors and support advertising messages with which they disagree. Most observers believed that the Supreme Court had ended litigation, at least on First Amendment grounds, by ruling in favor of the marketing programs. However, a November 1999 decision by the u.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals threatens to reignite the debate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信