大约900-1250年克什米尔河谷的创新和社会变革

J. Němec
{"title":"大约900-1250年克什米尔河谷的创新和社会变革","authors":"J. Němec","doi":"10.1163/9789004432802_014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that religious agents in premodern South Asia appealed to the purported timelessness and transcendence of their scriptural sources to secure not only their legitimacy but also that of the ideas found in them. Equally well known—in no small part due to the work of Alexis Sanderson on the social history of Śaiva and other religious traditions in early-medieval Kashmir and elsewhere—is the fact that premodern South Asian religions do not appear as unchanging and immobile traditions in social stasis. Quite the opposite: the various religious traditions of medieval South Asia were nothing if not innovative in idea and practice, most notably in their literary productions. These myriad religious traditions, moreover, had a measurable and not insignificant influence on contemporaneous social life. In beginning to address thequestionof religious change inpremodern South Asia I would like not merely to point out that the religious practitioners of the day were surely able to distinguish new religious, and other, ideas and practices from received tradition—just as we are today—a fact that itself calls into question the reification of the sort of social stasis and lack of historical awareness posited in previous Indological scholarship.1 I also will argue that","PeriodicalId":153610,"journal":{"name":"Śaivism and the Tantric Traditions","volume":"28 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation and Social Change in the Vale of Kashmir, circa 900–1250 C.E.\",\"authors\":\"J. Němec\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004432802_014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that religious agents in premodern South Asia appealed to the purported timelessness and transcendence of their scriptural sources to secure not only their legitimacy but also that of the ideas found in them. Equally well known—in no small part due to the work of Alexis Sanderson on the social history of Śaiva and other religious traditions in early-medieval Kashmir and elsewhere—is the fact that premodern South Asian religions do not appear as unchanging and immobile traditions in social stasis. Quite the opposite: the various religious traditions of medieval South Asia were nothing if not innovative in idea and practice, most notably in their literary productions. These myriad religious traditions, moreover, had a measurable and not insignificant influence on contemporaneous social life. In beginning to address thequestionof religious change inpremodern South Asia I would like not merely to point out that the religious practitioners of the day were surely able to distinguish new religious, and other, ideas and practices from received tradition—just as we are today—a fact that itself calls into question the reification of the sort of social stasis and lack of historical awareness posited in previous Indological scholarship.1 I also will argue that\",\"PeriodicalId\":153610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Śaivism and the Tantric Traditions\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Śaivism and the Tantric Traditions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432802_014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Śaivism and the Tantric Traditions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432802_014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

众所周知,前现代南亚的宗教代理人诉诸其圣经来源的所谓永恒性和超越性,不仅确保其合法性,而且确保其中发现的思想的合法性。同样众所周知的是,亚历克西斯·桑德森(Alexis Sanderson)对Śaiva的社会史以及中世纪早期克什米尔和其他地方的其他宗教传统的研究在很大程度上归功于这一事实,即前现代南亚宗教在社会停滞中并不是一成不变的传统。恰恰相反:中世纪南亚的各种宗教传统如果没有思想和实践上的创新,尤其是在他们的文学作品上,就什么都不是。此外,这些无数的宗教传统对当时的社会生活产生了不可估量的影响。在开始讨论前现代南亚的宗教变化问题时,我不仅想指出,当时的宗教实践者肯定能够从公认的传统中区分出新的宗教和其他思想和实践——就像我们今天一样——这一事实本身就让人质疑以前印度学学者所假定的那种社会停滞和缺乏历史意识的具体表现我也会争论这个问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovation and Social Change in the Vale of Kashmir, circa 900–1250 C.E.
It is well known that religious agents in premodern South Asia appealed to the purported timelessness and transcendence of their scriptural sources to secure not only their legitimacy but also that of the ideas found in them. Equally well known—in no small part due to the work of Alexis Sanderson on the social history of Śaiva and other religious traditions in early-medieval Kashmir and elsewhere—is the fact that premodern South Asian religions do not appear as unchanging and immobile traditions in social stasis. Quite the opposite: the various religious traditions of medieval South Asia were nothing if not innovative in idea and practice, most notably in their literary productions. These myriad religious traditions, moreover, had a measurable and not insignificant influence on contemporaneous social life. In beginning to address thequestionof religious change inpremodern South Asia I would like not merely to point out that the religious practitioners of the day were surely able to distinguish new religious, and other, ideas and practices from received tradition—just as we are today—a fact that itself calls into question the reification of the sort of social stasis and lack of historical awareness posited in previous Indological scholarship.1 I also will argue that
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信