某汽车SAE四级与五级系统理论过程分析结果比较

Greta Koelln, M. Klicker, S. Schmidt
{"title":"某汽车SAE四级与五级系统理论过程分析结果比较","authors":"Greta Koelln, M. Klicker, S. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety is a decisive factor during the development of automotive systems. Modern vehicles are becoming more software-intensive, electronic components are increasingly replacing mechanical units. This is accompanied by a further increase in the complexity of the systems. Mobility concepts could be subject to fundamental changes in the future. There is a broad consensus among safety and security experts that traditional methods alone can no longer guarantee adequate safeguarding of software-intensive systems. Faced with the problems that the fundamental changes in today’s designed systems require a need for new hazard analyses, Leveson developed the System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) in 2004. This paper shows how the STPA analysis can be used as a valuable tool to identify potential hazards. In this paper partial results of STPA for a vehicle SAE2 level five are presented and compared with the results of STPA, carried out for a vehicle SAE level four by the same authors. This paper has not yet been published but a draft version is available.2SAE as a definition of the automation levels as defined in the SAE J3016 standard.","PeriodicalId":394538,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Results of the System Theoretic Process Analysis for a Vehicle SAE Level four and five\",\"authors\":\"Greta Koelln, M. Klicker, S. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Safety is a decisive factor during the development of automotive systems. Modern vehicles are becoming more software-intensive, electronic components are increasingly replacing mechanical units. This is accompanied by a further increase in the complexity of the systems. Mobility concepts could be subject to fundamental changes in the future. There is a broad consensus among safety and security experts that traditional methods alone can no longer guarantee adequate safeguarding of software-intensive systems. Faced with the problems that the fundamental changes in today’s designed systems require a need for new hazard analyses, Leveson developed the System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) in 2004. This paper shows how the STPA analysis can be used as a valuable tool to identify potential hazards. In this paper partial results of STPA for a vehicle SAE2 level five are presented and compared with the results of STPA, carried out for a vehicle SAE level four by the same authors. This paper has not yet been published but a draft version is available.2SAE as a definition of the automation levels as defined in the SAE J3016 standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在汽车系统的发展过程中,安全性是一个决定性的因素。现代汽车的软件密集度越来越高,电子部件越来越多地取代机械部件。这伴随着系统复杂性的进一步增加。未来,移动概念可能会发生根本性的变化。安全和安全专家之间有一个广泛的共识,即仅靠传统方法已不能保证对软件密集型系统的充分保护。面对当今设计系统的根本变化需要新的危害分析的问题,Leveson在2004年开发了系统理论过程分析(STPA)。本文展示了如何将STPA分析用作识别潜在危害的有价值的工具。本文给出了SAE2 5级车辆的部分STPA结果,并与同一作者对SAE2 4级车辆进行的STPA结果进行了比较。该文件尚未发表,但有一个草稿。2SAE作为自动化级别的定义,在SAE J3016标准中定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Results of the System Theoretic Process Analysis for a Vehicle SAE Level four and five
Safety is a decisive factor during the development of automotive systems. Modern vehicles are becoming more software-intensive, electronic components are increasingly replacing mechanical units. This is accompanied by a further increase in the complexity of the systems. Mobility concepts could be subject to fundamental changes in the future. There is a broad consensus among safety and security experts that traditional methods alone can no longer guarantee adequate safeguarding of software-intensive systems. Faced with the problems that the fundamental changes in today’s designed systems require a need for new hazard analyses, Leveson developed the System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) in 2004. This paper shows how the STPA analysis can be used as a valuable tool to identify potential hazards. In this paper partial results of STPA for a vehicle SAE2 level five are presented and compared with the results of STPA, carried out for a vehicle SAE level four by the same authors. This paper has not yet been published but a draft version is available.2SAE as a definition of the automation levels as defined in the SAE J3016 standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信