采用全摆门扩散输入的不同加法器的研究

Deepesh Sahoo, Abhishek Deshpande, M. Sunitha
{"title":"采用全摆门扩散输入的不同加法器的研究","authors":"Deepesh Sahoo, Abhishek Deshpande, M. Sunitha","doi":"10.1109/ICRAIE51050.2020.9358374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the comparison of Multiple 16 Bit Adders using Gate Diffusion Input (GDI) and CMOS logic. Performance enhancements using Swing Restoration has been studied. The paper focuses on three commonly used adders: Ripple Carry Adder, Carry Select Adder and the Carry Lookahead Adder. The simulation results reveal smaller area and better consumption for the GDI logic when compared with their CMOS designs at 180nm GPDK Technologies. The results have been evaluated using spectre in Cadence Virtuoso IC614. For Ripple carry adder and carry Select adder the GDI logic out performs the CMOS logic in terms of area and power. However, CMOS shows better performance in terms of delay and Rise/Fall time. For Carry lookahead adder, GDI performs better in terms of area, while CMOS performs better in terms of power, delay and Rise/Fall Time.)","PeriodicalId":149717,"journal":{"name":"2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of Different Adders Using Full Swing Gate Diffusion Input\",\"authors\":\"Deepesh Sahoo, Abhishek Deshpande, M. Sunitha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRAIE51050.2020.9358374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the comparison of Multiple 16 Bit Adders using Gate Diffusion Input (GDI) and CMOS logic. Performance enhancements using Swing Restoration has been studied. The paper focuses on three commonly used adders: Ripple Carry Adder, Carry Select Adder and the Carry Lookahead Adder. The simulation results reveal smaller area and better consumption for the GDI logic when compared with their CMOS designs at 180nm GPDK Technologies. The results have been evaluated using spectre in Cadence Virtuoso IC614. For Ripple carry adder and carry Select adder the GDI logic out performs the CMOS logic in terms of area and power. However, CMOS shows better performance in terms of delay and Rise/Fall time. For Carry lookahead adder, GDI performs better in terms of area, while CMOS performs better in terms of power, delay and Rise/Fall Time.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":149717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE)\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRAIE51050.2020.9358374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRAIE51050.2020.9358374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对采用门扩散输入(GDI)和CMOS逻辑的多个16位加法器进行了比较。已经研究了使用Swing Restoration来增强性能。本文重点介绍了常用的三种加法器:纹波进位加法器、进位选择加法器和进位前向加法器。仿真结果表明,与180nm GPDK技术的CMOS设计相比,GDI逻辑的面积更小,功耗更高。使用Cadence Virtuoso IC614中的spectre对结果进行了评估。对于纹波进位加法器和进位选择加法器,GDI逻辑在面积和功率方面优于CMOS逻辑。然而,CMOS在延迟和上升/下降时间方面表现出更好的性能。对于Carry forward加法器,GDI在面积方面表现更好,而CMOS在功率,延迟和上升/下降时间方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of Different Adders Using Full Swing Gate Diffusion Input
This paper presents the comparison of Multiple 16 Bit Adders using Gate Diffusion Input (GDI) and CMOS logic. Performance enhancements using Swing Restoration has been studied. The paper focuses on three commonly used adders: Ripple Carry Adder, Carry Select Adder and the Carry Lookahead Adder. The simulation results reveal smaller area and better consumption for the GDI logic when compared with their CMOS designs at 180nm GPDK Technologies. The results have been evaluated using spectre in Cadence Virtuoso IC614. For Ripple carry adder and carry Select adder the GDI logic out performs the CMOS logic in terms of area and power. However, CMOS shows better performance in terms of delay and Rise/Fall time. For Carry lookahead adder, GDI performs better in terms of area, while CMOS performs better in terms of power, delay and Rise/Fall Time.)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信