揭开实验设计的神秘面纱,并提出一个建议

L. Votta
{"title":"揭开实验设计的神秘面纱,并提出一个建议","authors":"L. Votta","doi":"10.1109/METRIC.1998.731243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. As the computer science and software engineering community recognizes the importance of empirical studies, we look to many other disciplines for models of empirical work. At the core of many of these models are methods and techniques refined over the years that are known to be credible to the discipline's typical environments. One way of capturing this knowledge is to abstract the method into an experimental design, but what is an experimental design? I try to take some mystery out of experimental design. The key ideas are to recognize that science and engineering are founded upon credibility, which can range in empirical studies from the weak credibility of specific, non-verifiable, anecdotal reports to the strong credibility of experiments to show a casual relationship with that of the case study somewhere in the middle. The experimental design is the logic and interpretation infrastructure that attempts to show a causal relationship. I describe several experimental designs from different disciplines and abstract the key elements to form an operational definition. Finally, I observe that computer science and software engineering environments are similar to the biological sciences and conclude that an excellent match for our environments is the in vivo and in vitro empirical model and their experimental designs.","PeriodicalId":444081,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium. Metrics (Cat. No.98TB100262)","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the mystery out of experimental design-and a proposal\",\"authors\":\"L. Votta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/METRIC.1998.731243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. As the computer science and software engineering community recognizes the importance of empirical studies, we look to many other disciplines for models of empirical work. At the core of many of these models are methods and techniques refined over the years that are known to be credible to the discipline's typical environments. One way of capturing this knowledge is to abstract the method into an experimental design, but what is an experimental design? I try to take some mystery out of experimental design. The key ideas are to recognize that science and engineering are founded upon credibility, which can range in empirical studies from the weak credibility of specific, non-verifiable, anecdotal reports to the strong credibility of experiments to show a casual relationship with that of the case study somewhere in the middle. The experimental design is the logic and interpretation infrastructure that attempts to show a causal relationship. I describe several experimental designs from different disciplines and abstract the key elements to form an operational definition. Finally, I observe that computer science and software engineering environments are similar to the biological sciences and conclude that an excellent match for our environments is the in vivo and in vitro empirical model and their experimental designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium. Metrics (Cat. No.98TB100262)\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium. Metrics (Cat. No.98TB100262)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.1998.731243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium. Metrics (Cat. No.98TB100262)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.1998.731243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只提供摘要形式。随着计算机科学和软件工程社区认识到实证研究的重要性,我们期待许多其他学科的实证工作模型。许多这些模型的核心是经过多年改进的方法和技术,这些方法和技术在该学科的典型环境中被认为是可信的。获取这些知识的一种方法是将方法抽象为实验设计,但什么是实验设计呢?我试图从实验设计中去除一些神秘感。关键思想是要认识到科学和工程是建立在可信度的基础上的,在实证研究中,它的范围可以从具体的、不可验证的轶事报告的弱可信度到实验的强可信度,以显示与案例研究之间的偶然关系。实验设计是试图显示因果关系的逻辑和解释基础设施。我描述了来自不同学科的几个实验设计,并将关键要素抽象出来,形成一个可操作的定义。最后,我观察到计算机科学和软件工程环境与生物科学相似,并得出结论,与我们的环境非常匹配的是体内和体外的经验模型及其实验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking the mystery out of experimental design-and a proposal
Summary form only given. As the computer science and software engineering community recognizes the importance of empirical studies, we look to many other disciplines for models of empirical work. At the core of many of these models are methods and techniques refined over the years that are known to be credible to the discipline's typical environments. One way of capturing this knowledge is to abstract the method into an experimental design, but what is an experimental design? I try to take some mystery out of experimental design. The key ideas are to recognize that science and engineering are founded upon credibility, which can range in empirical studies from the weak credibility of specific, non-verifiable, anecdotal reports to the strong credibility of experiments to show a casual relationship with that of the case study somewhere in the middle. The experimental design is the logic and interpretation infrastructure that attempts to show a causal relationship. I describe several experimental designs from different disciplines and abstract the key elements to form an operational definition. Finally, I observe that computer science and software engineering environments are similar to the biological sciences and conclude that an excellent match for our environments is the in vivo and in vitro empirical model and their experimental designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信