7种Bug报告类型的比较——以Google Chrome浏览器项目为例

Sangeeta Lal, A. Sureka
{"title":"7种Bug报告类型的比较——以Google Chrome浏览器项目为例","authors":"Sangeeta Lal, A. Sureka","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2012.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bug reports submitted to an issue tracking system can belong to different categories such as crash, regression, security, cleanup, polish, performance and usability. A deeper understanding of the properties and features of various categories of bug reports can have implications in improving software maintenance processes, tools and practices. We identify several metrics and characteristics serving as dimensions on which various types of bug reports can be compared. We perform a case-study on Google Chromium Browser open-source project and conduct a series of experiments to calculate various metrics. We present a characterization study comparing different types of bug reports on metrics such as: statistics on close-time, number of stars, number of comments, discriminatory and frequent words for each class, entropy across reporters, entropy across component, opening and closing trend, continuity and debugging efficiency performance characteristics. The calculated metrics shows the similarities and differences on various dimensions for seven different types of bug reports.","PeriodicalId":364411,"journal":{"name":"2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Seven Bug Report Types: A Case-Study of Google Chrome Browser Project\",\"authors\":\"Sangeeta Lal, A. Sureka\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2012.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bug reports submitted to an issue tracking system can belong to different categories such as crash, regression, security, cleanup, polish, performance and usability. A deeper understanding of the properties and features of various categories of bug reports can have implications in improving software maintenance processes, tools and practices. We identify several metrics and characteristics serving as dimensions on which various types of bug reports can be compared. We perform a case-study on Google Chromium Browser open-source project and conduct a series of experiments to calculate various metrics. We present a characterization study comparing different types of bug reports on metrics such as: statistics on close-time, number of stars, number of comments, discriminatory and frequent words for each class, entropy across reporters, entropy across component, opening and closing trend, continuity and debugging efficiency performance characteristics. The calculated metrics shows the similarities and differences on various dimensions for seven different types of bug reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2012.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2012.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

提交给问题跟踪系统的漏洞报告可以属于不同的类别,如崩溃、回归、安全、清理、优化、性能和可用性。更深入地了解各种类型的bug报告的属性和特征,可以对改进软件维护过程、工具和实践产生影响。我们确定了几个度量标准和特征,作为各种类型的bug报告可以进行比较的维度。我们对谷歌Chromium Browser开源项目进行了案例研究,并进行了一系列实验来计算各种指标。我们对不同类型的bug报告进行了表征研究,比较了不同类型的bug报告的指标,如:关闭时间统计、星星数量、评论数量、每个类别的歧视性和频繁词、报告者间熵、组件间熵、打开和关闭趋势、连续性和调试效率性能特征。计算的指标显示了七种不同类型的bug报告在不同维度上的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Seven Bug Report Types: A Case-Study of Google Chrome Browser Project
Bug reports submitted to an issue tracking system can belong to different categories such as crash, regression, security, cleanup, polish, performance and usability. A deeper understanding of the properties and features of various categories of bug reports can have implications in improving software maintenance processes, tools and practices. We identify several metrics and characteristics serving as dimensions on which various types of bug reports can be compared. We perform a case-study on Google Chromium Browser open-source project and conduct a series of experiments to calculate various metrics. We present a characterization study comparing different types of bug reports on metrics such as: statistics on close-time, number of stars, number of comments, discriminatory and frequent words for each class, entropy across reporters, entropy across component, opening and closing trend, continuity and debugging efficiency performance characteristics. The calculated metrics shows the similarities and differences on various dimensions for seven different types of bug reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信