减少剂量:减少儿科见习教学

Amy B. Guiot, Michael Fitzgerald, C. Lehmann
{"title":"减少剂量:减少儿科见习教学","authors":"Amy B. Guiot, Michael Fitzgerald, C. Lehmann","doi":"10.2174/1876519X01407010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While case-based learning (CBL) sessions and Computer assisted Learning in Pediatrics Project (CLIPP) modules can be effective teaching modalities, there is little information about the optimal number and types of cases to require of medical students. Aims: The aims of this investigation were to determine if a greater than 50% reduction in CBL and CLIPP improved student perceptions regarding: 1) reasonableness of the time required to complete CBL and CLIPP 2) educational effectiveness of CBL and CLIPP 3) and assess potential impact on shelf exam scores. Methods: The Class of 2013 completed 25 CBL and 6 CLIPP modules; a reduction from the 50 CBL and 16 CLIPP required of the 2012 class. A survey was emailed to students to assess their perceptions regarding the above aims. Results: The class of 2013 indicated the number of CLIPP required was more reasonable. The two classes reported similar levels of perceived effectiveness. There was no difference in mean shelf exam scores. Conclusion: We reduced by over 50% the number of CBL and CLIPP without negatively impacting the perceived effectiveness of those methods or exam scores. Perhaps clerkship directors can be selective and more learner-centered when choosing required CBL or CLIPP.","PeriodicalId":304672,"journal":{"name":"The Open Medical Education Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing the Dosage: Decreasing Pediatric Clerkship Didactics\",\"authors\":\"Amy B. Guiot, Michael Fitzgerald, C. Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876519X01407010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: While case-based learning (CBL) sessions and Computer assisted Learning in Pediatrics Project (CLIPP) modules can be effective teaching modalities, there is little information about the optimal number and types of cases to require of medical students. Aims: The aims of this investigation were to determine if a greater than 50% reduction in CBL and CLIPP improved student perceptions regarding: 1) reasonableness of the time required to complete CBL and CLIPP 2) educational effectiveness of CBL and CLIPP 3) and assess potential impact on shelf exam scores. Methods: The Class of 2013 completed 25 CBL and 6 CLIPP modules; a reduction from the 50 CBL and 16 CLIPP required of the 2012 class. A survey was emailed to students to assess their perceptions regarding the above aims. Results: The class of 2013 indicated the number of CLIPP required was more reasonable. The two classes reported similar levels of perceived effectiveness. There was no difference in mean shelf exam scores. Conclusion: We reduced by over 50% the number of CBL and CLIPP without negatively impacting the perceived effectiveness of those methods or exam scores. Perhaps clerkship directors can be selective and more learner-centered when choosing required CBL or CLIPP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Medical Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Medical Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876519X01407010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876519X01407010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然基于案例的学习(CBL)课程和计算机辅助学习儿科项目(CLIPP)模块可以是有效的教学模式,但关于医学生需要的最佳病例数量和类型的信息很少。目的:本调查的目的是确定CBL和CLIPP减少50%以上是否改善了学生对以下方面的看法:1)完成CBL和CLIPP所需时间的合理性2)CBL和CLIPP的教育有效性3)评估对货架考试成绩的潜在影响。方法:2013级学员完成25个CBL模块和6个CLIPP模块;从2012级所需的50 CBL和16 CLIPP减少。通过电子邮件向学生发送了一份调查问卷,以评估他们对上述目标的看法。结果:2013级学生认为所需的CLIPP数量更为合理。这两个班级报告的感知有效性水平相似。货架平均考试成绩没有差异。结论:我们将CBL和CLIPP的数量减少了50%以上,但并未对这些方法的感知有效性或考试分数产生负面影响。也许在选择所需的CBL或CLIPP时,办事员主管可以更有选择性,更以学习者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing the Dosage: Decreasing Pediatric Clerkship Didactics
Background: While case-based learning (CBL) sessions and Computer assisted Learning in Pediatrics Project (CLIPP) modules can be effective teaching modalities, there is little information about the optimal number and types of cases to require of medical students. Aims: The aims of this investigation were to determine if a greater than 50% reduction in CBL and CLIPP improved student perceptions regarding: 1) reasonableness of the time required to complete CBL and CLIPP 2) educational effectiveness of CBL and CLIPP 3) and assess potential impact on shelf exam scores. Methods: The Class of 2013 completed 25 CBL and 6 CLIPP modules; a reduction from the 50 CBL and 16 CLIPP required of the 2012 class. A survey was emailed to students to assess their perceptions regarding the above aims. Results: The class of 2013 indicated the number of CLIPP required was more reasonable. The two classes reported similar levels of perceived effectiveness. There was no difference in mean shelf exam scores. Conclusion: We reduced by over 50% the number of CBL and CLIPP without negatively impacting the perceived effectiveness of those methods or exam scores. Perhaps clerkship directors can be selective and more learner-centered when choosing required CBL or CLIPP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信