有限责任

Larry E. Ribstein
{"title":"有限责任","authors":"Larry E. Ribstein","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.92188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many types of economic relationships, including joint ventures, franchises and joint operating agreements, resemble economic firms but differ from them in critical respects. Because of these non-firm attributes, the parties to these relationships may not want the owner vicarious liability that comes by default with the legal characterization of a relationship as a partnership or agency. In order to clarify that the relationship does not trigger vicarious liability, the parties can form a corporation or other limited liability business association. However, the statutory default rules of these business associations do not fit many borderline firms. This Article proposes a way out of this dilemma -- statutes authorizing \"Contractual Entities\" whose owner liability and other terms would be governed solely by their filed operating agreements. The Article analyzes potential arguments against the proposal, including those relating to the appropriate scope of limited liability and the functions of statutory forms. It also discusses the political aspects of adopting Contractual Entity statutes and some implications of the proposal for the future of limited liability and of contractual choice of law.","PeriodicalId":431428,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: LLCs","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited Liability Unlimited\",\"authors\":\"Larry E. Ribstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.92188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many types of economic relationships, including joint ventures, franchises and joint operating agreements, resemble economic firms but differ from them in critical respects. Because of these non-firm attributes, the parties to these relationships may not want the owner vicarious liability that comes by default with the legal characterization of a relationship as a partnership or agency. In order to clarify that the relationship does not trigger vicarious liability, the parties can form a corporation or other limited liability business association. However, the statutory default rules of these business associations do not fit many borderline firms. This Article proposes a way out of this dilemma -- statutes authorizing \\\"Contractual Entities\\\" whose owner liability and other terms would be governed solely by their filed operating agreements. The Article analyzes potential arguments against the proposal, including those relating to the appropriate scope of limited liability and the functions of statutory forms. It also discusses the political aspects of adopting Contractual Entity statutes and some implications of the proposal for the future of limited liability and of contractual choice of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: LLCs\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: LLCs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.92188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: LLCs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.92188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

许多类型的经济关系,包括合资企业、特许经营权和共同经营协议,类似于经济公司,但在关键方面又有所不同。由于这些非公司属性,这些关系的各方可能不希望所有者承担替代责任,因为这种责任是由合伙或代理关系的法律特征默认产生的。为了明确这种关系不会引发替代责任,当事人可以组成公司或其他有限责任商业协会。然而,这些商业协会的法定违约规则并不适合许多边缘公司。本文提出了一种摆脱这种困境的方法——制定法律授权“合同实体”,其所有者责任和其他条款将仅受其提交的经营协议的管辖。本文分析了反对该建议的潜在论据,包括有关有限责任的适当范围和法定形式的功能的论据。它还讨论了通过合同实体法规的政治方面以及有限责任和合同法律选择的建议对未来的一些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited Liability Unlimited
Many types of economic relationships, including joint ventures, franchises and joint operating agreements, resemble economic firms but differ from them in critical respects. Because of these non-firm attributes, the parties to these relationships may not want the owner vicarious liability that comes by default with the legal characterization of a relationship as a partnership or agency. In order to clarify that the relationship does not trigger vicarious liability, the parties can form a corporation or other limited liability business association. However, the statutory default rules of these business associations do not fit many borderline firms. This Article proposes a way out of this dilemma -- statutes authorizing "Contractual Entities" whose owner liability and other terms would be governed solely by their filed operating agreements. The Article analyzes potential arguments against the proposal, including those relating to the appropriate scope of limited liability and the functions of statutory forms. It also discusses the political aspects of adopting Contractual Entity statutes and some implications of the proposal for the future of limited liability and of contractual choice of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信