自动相关监视广播(ADS-B)组件级模型

Michael M. Madden
{"title":"自动相关监视广播(ADS-B)组件级模型","authors":"Michael M. Madden","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-4061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) is being employed in numerous peer-to-peer initiatives attempting to expand the capacity of the National Airspace System (NAS) or enable mixed operations of manned and unmanned vehicles. Safety assessments of these initiatives rely, in part, on modeling the accuracy of ADS-B in reporting the position and direction of an ownship and surrounding traffic. Frequently, these initiatives utilize a position uncertainty model that applies a reported ADS-B estimation position uncertainty (EPU) value to a Rayleigh distribution and uses a Gauss-Markov random walk to add error to the ADS-B output of a vehicle. This model of ADS-B state error is easy to implement and apply to numerous problems. However, it has a couple of drawbacks. First, the ADS-B state errors are equally probable in all directions. This is a good assumption in situations where aircraft maneuvering is not constrained. However, in situations where the aircraft maneuvering is constrained such as landing, the error distribution is likely to exhibit directionality and the non-directional model may skew results especially when assessing very low probabilities (e.g., 10-9) of catastrophic encounters. Second, the model does not account for processing latency in the receiving aircraft. NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) recently examined the feasibility of decreasing the spacing of aircraft on parallel approaches to runways separated by as little as 700 feet [Perry2013]. For Monte-Carlo analysis using a high-fidelity simulation of a large transport, LaRC started with a Gauss-Markov model of ADS-B error but then developed a component level model of ADS-B error to increase the fidelity of results. This LaRC assessment of parallel approaches had a forward looking time frame of five to ten years. Therefore, the component level model assumes that the ADS-B system is fed directly from and synchronized with an autonomous Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. This model covers the end-to-end reporting and consumption of ADS-B state from the GPS receiver on the transmitting aircraft to processing of the ADS-B report on the receiving aircraft. The model essentially divides the ADS-B path into four systems: the GPS receiver, the ADS-B OUT system, the ADS-B IN system, and the target application. A common error source in each system is latency and each system may vary in the duration of its processing latency and how much of that latency the system attempts to https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190000876 2020-05-07T22:03:10+00:00Z","PeriodicalId":326346,"journal":{"name":"2018 Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Component-Level Model of Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B)\",\"authors\":\"Michael M. Madden\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/6.2018-4061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) is being employed in numerous peer-to-peer initiatives attempting to expand the capacity of the National Airspace System (NAS) or enable mixed operations of manned and unmanned vehicles. Safety assessments of these initiatives rely, in part, on modeling the accuracy of ADS-B in reporting the position and direction of an ownship and surrounding traffic. Frequently, these initiatives utilize a position uncertainty model that applies a reported ADS-B estimation position uncertainty (EPU) value to a Rayleigh distribution and uses a Gauss-Markov random walk to add error to the ADS-B output of a vehicle. This model of ADS-B state error is easy to implement and apply to numerous problems. However, it has a couple of drawbacks. First, the ADS-B state errors are equally probable in all directions. This is a good assumption in situations where aircraft maneuvering is not constrained. However, in situations where the aircraft maneuvering is constrained such as landing, the error distribution is likely to exhibit directionality and the non-directional model may skew results especially when assessing very low probabilities (e.g., 10-9) of catastrophic encounters. Second, the model does not account for processing latency in the receiving aircraft. NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) recently examined the feasibility of decreasing the spacing of aircraft on parallel approaches to runways separated by as little as 700 feet [Perry2013]. For Monte-Carlo analysis using a high-fidelity simulation of a large transport, LaRC started with a Gauss-Markov model of ADS-B error but then developed a component level model of ADS-B error to increase the fidelity of results. This LaRC assessment of parallel approaches had a forward looking time frame of five to ten years. Therefore, the component level model assumes that the ADS-B system is fed directly from and synchronized with an autonomous Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. This model covers the end-to-end reporting and consumption of ADS-B state from the GPS receiver on the transmitting aircraft to processing of the ADS-B report on the receiving aircraft. The model essentially divides the ADS-B path into four systems: the GPS receiver, the ADS-B OUT system, the ADS-B IN system, and the target application. A common error source in each system is latency and each system may vary in the duration of its processing latency and how much of that latency the system attempts to https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190000876 2020-05-07T22:03:10+00:00Z\",\"PeriodicalId\":326346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动相关监视-广播(ADS-B)被用于许多点对点计划,试图扩大国家空域系统(NAS)的容量或实现有人驾驶和无人驾驶车辆的混合操作。这些举措的安全评估部分依赖于模拟ADS-B在报告车辆位置和方向以及周围交通方面的准确性。通常,这些举措利用位置不确定性模型,将报告的ADS-B估计位置不确定性(EPU)值应用于瑞利分布,并使用高斯-马尔可夫随机漫步来增加车辆ADS-B输出的误差。该ADS-B状态误差模型易于实现,适用于许多问题。然而,它有一些缺点。首先,ADS-B状态误差在所有方向上都是等概率的。在飞机机动不受约束的情况下,这是一个很好的假设。然而,在飞机机动受限的情况下,如着陆,误差分布可能会表现出方向性,而非方向性模型可能会扭曲结果,特别是在评估灾难性遭遇的极低概率(例如10-9)时。其次,该模型没有考虑接收飞机的处理延迟。美国宇航局兰利研究中心(LaRC)最近研究了减少飞机平行进近间距的可行性,间距仅为700英尺[Perry2013]。为了对大型输运进行高保真模拟的蒙特卡罗分析,LaRC从ADS-B误差的高斯-马尔可夫模型开始,然后开发了ADS-B误差的分量级模型,以提高结果的保真度。LaRC对平行方法的评估具有5至10年的前瞻性时间框架。因此,组件级模型假设ADS-B系统直接从自主全球定位系统(GPS)接收器馈送并与之同步。该模型涵盖了从发射飞机的GPS接收机端到端报告和消耗ADS-B状态到接收飞机处理ADS-B报告的过程。该模型将ADS-B路径基本划分为四个系统:GPS接收机、ADS-B OUT系统、ADS-B IN系统和目标应用。每个系统中常见的错误源是延迟,每个系统的处理延迟持续时间和系统尝试的延迟程度可能各不相同https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190000876 2020-05-07T22:03:10+00:00Z
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Component-Level Model of Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B)
Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) is being employed in numerous peer-to-peer initiatives attempting to expand the capacity of the National Airspace System (NAS) or enable mixed operations of manned and unmanned vehicles. Safety assessments of these initiatives rely, in part, on modeling the accuracy of ADS-B in reporting the position and direction of an ownship and surrounding traffic. Frequently, these initiatives utilize a position uncertainty model that applies a reported ADS-B estimation position uncertainty (EPU) value to a Rayleigh distribution and uses a Gauss-Markov random walk to add error to the ADS-B output of a vehicle. This model of ADS-B state error is easy to implement and apply to numerous problems. However, it has a couple of drawbacks. First, the ADS-B state errors are equally probable in all directions. This is a good assumption in situations where aircraft maneuvering is not constrained. However, in situations where the aircraft maneuvering is constrained such as landing, the error distribution is likely to exhibit directionality and the non-directional model may skew results especially when assessing very low probabilities (e.g., 10-9) of catastrophic encounters. Second, the model does not account for processing latency in the receiving aircraft. NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) recently examined the feasibility of decreasing the spacing of aircraft on parallel approaches to runways separated by as little as 700 feet [Perry2013]. For Monte-Carlo analysis using a high-fidelity simulation of a large transport, LaRC started with a Gauss-Markov model of ADS-B error but then developed a component level model of ADS-B error to increase the fidelity of results. This LaRC assessment of parallel approaches had a forward looking time frame of five to ten years. Therefore, the component level model assumes that the ADS-B system is fed directly from and synchronized with an autonomous Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. This model covers the end-to-end reporting and consumption of ADS-B state from the GPS receiver on the transmitting aircraft to processing of the ADS-B report on the receiving aircraft. The model essentially divides the ADS-B path into four systems: the GPS receiver, the ADS-B OUT system, the ADS-B IN system, and the target application. A common error source in each system is latency and each system may vary in the duration of its processing latency and how much of that latency the system attempts to https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190000876 2020-05-07T22:03:10+00:00Z
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信