{"title":"军事模拟的结构与动力学","authors":"E. Levine","doi":"10.1145/1463891.1463919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread use of military simulations as a tool for predicting and evaluating systems operations has led investigators to ferret out the generic structure underlying the construct of such simulations. Although a good deal of success has been encountered in this effort, it is evident that only a start in this direction has been achieved thus far. In this discussion, we will indicate where the state-of-the-art rests today and attempt to point out further areas of investigation where new inroads may exist.","PeriodicalId":143723,"journal":{"name":"AFIPS '65 (Fall, part I)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structure and dynamics of military simulations\",\"authors\":\"E. Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1463891.1463919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The widespread use of military simulations as a tool for predicting and evaluating systems operations has led investigators to ferret out the generic structure underlying the construct of such simulations. Although a good deal of success has been encountered in this effort, it is evident that only a start in this direction has been achieved thus far. In this discussion, we will indicate where the state-of-the-art rests today and attempt to point out further areas of investigation where new inroads may exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFIPS '65 (Fall, part I)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFIPS '65 (Fall, part I)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1463891.1463919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFIPS '65 (Fall, part I)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1463891.1463919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The widespread use of military simulations as a tool for predicting and evaluating systems operations has led investigators to ferret out the generic structure underlying the construct of such simulations. Although a good deal of success has been encountered in this effort, it is evident that only a start in this direction has been achieved thus far. In this discussion, we will indicate where the state-of-the-art rests today and attempt to point out further areas of investigation where new inroads may exist.