学生读写能力的分析是以反射和冲动的认知风格为基础的

Ebeneser Wacner Simamora, Akhiruddin Akhiruddin
{"title":"学生读写能力的分析是以反射和冲动的认知风格为基础的","authors":"Ebeneser Wacner Simamora, Akhiruddin Akhiruddin","doi":"10.30598/jumadikavol4iss2year2022page89-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Covid-19 pandemic, there was a change in the education system, namely regular or face-to-face Numerical literacy ability is the ability or skill in using various kinds of numbers and symbols related to basic mathematics to solve practical problems in the context of everyday life. This study aims to determine the numeracy literacy ability of students in solving math problems in terms of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. In looking at students' numeracy literacy skills, indicators of numeracy literacy abilities are used which are adjusted to the stages of the problem solving process. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 23 students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at the University of Papua. Data collection consisted of a numeracy literacy test, an MFFT (Matching Familiar Figure Test) test to determine cognitive style, interviews and documentation. The results of the MFFT test showed that there were 11 students with a reflective cognitive style, 9 students with an impulsive cognitive style, 1 student with a low accurate cognitive style, and 2 students with a fast accurate cognitive style. After that, 2 subjects with a reflective cognitive style were obtained which were supported by 2 subjects who had a tendency for a reflective cognitive style and 2 subjects who had an impulsive cognitive style. The results showed that the reflective subject one (SR1) the first reflective student completed the numeracy literacy problem in 91 minutes and the reflective subject two (SR2) completed the problem in 98 minutes, where the two subjects with the minute reflective style had exceeded the predetermined maximum time limit, namely 90 minutes. Impulsive subject one (SI1) completed the numeracy literacy test in 32 minutes. The second impulsive subject (SI2) completed the numeracy literacy test questions within 40 minutes. The two students completed it faster than the specified time limit of 90 minutes. Subjects with a cognitive-reflective style in solving problems take a long time but the results obtained tend to be correct or accurate, while subjects with an impulsive cognitive style seem to be in a hurry to answer and tend to be wrong","PeriodicalId":341511,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI NUMERASI MAHASISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF REFLEKTIF DAN IMPULSIF\",\"authors\":\"Ebeneser Wacner Simamora, Akhiruddin Akhiruddin\",\"doi\":\"10.30598/jumadikavol4iss2year2022page89-95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the Covid-19 pandemic, there was a change in the education system, namely regular or face-to-face Numerical literacy ability is the ability or skill in using various kinds of numbers and symbols related to basic mathematics to solve practical problems in the context of everyday life. This study aims to determine the numeracy literacy ability of students in solving math problems in terms of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. In looking at students' numeracy literacy skills, indicators of numeracy literacy abilities are used which are adjusted to the stages of the problem solving process. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 23 students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at the University of Papua. Data collection consisted of a numeracy literacy test, an MFFT (Matching Familiar Figure Test) test to determine cognitive style, interviews and documentation. The results of the MFFT test showed that there were 11 students with a reflective cognitive style, 9 students with an impulsive cognitive style, 1 student with a low accurate cognitive style, and 2 students with a fast accurate cognitive style. After that, 2 subjects with a reflective cognitive style were obtained which were supported by 2 subjects who had a tendency for a reflective cognitive style and 2 subjects who had an impulsive cognitive style. The results showed that the reflective subject one (SR1) the first reflective student completed the numeracy literacy problem in 91 minutes and the reflective subject two (SR2) completed the problem in 98 minutes, where the two subjects with the minute reflective style had exceeded the predetermined maximum time limit, namely 90 minutes. Impulsive subject one (SI1) completed the numeracy literacy test in 32 minutes. The second impulsive subject (SI2) completed the numeracy literacy test questions within 40 minutes. The two students completed it faster than the specified time limit of 90 minutes. Subjects with a cognitive-reflective style in solving problems take a long time but the results obtained tend to be correct or accurate, while subjects with an impulsive cognitive style seem to be in a hurry to answer and tend to be wrong\",\"PeriodicalId\":341511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol4iss2year2022page89-95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol4iss2year2022page89-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新冠肺炎疫情期间,教育体系发生了变化,即定期或面对面的数字读写能力是指在日常生活中使用与基础数学相关的各种数字和符号来解决实际问题的能力或技能。本研究旨在从反思性认知和冲动性认知两种方式来确定学生解决数学问题的算术素养能力。在考察学生的算术读写能力时,使用了根据问题解决过程的各个阶段进行调整的算术读写能力指标。本研究采用定性方法进行描述性研究。研究对象包括巴布亚大学数学教育研究项目的23名学生。数据收集包括一个计算能力测试,一个MFFT(匹配熟悉图形测试)测试,以确定认知风格,访谈和文件。MFFT测试结果显示,反思性认知风格学生11人,冲动性认知风格学生9人,低准确性认知风格学生1人,快速准确性认知风格学生2人。在此基础上,得到2名具有反思性认知风格倾向的被试和2名具有冲动性认知风格的被试。结果显示,第一反思学生的反思对象1 (SR1)在91分钟内完成了计算素养问题,反思对象2 (SR2)在98分钟内完成了问题,其中两名具有分钟反思风格的被试已经超过了预定的最大时间限制,即90分钟。冲动受试者1 (SI1)在32分钟内完成了算术读写测试。第二组冲动型受试者(SI2)在40分钟内完成了算术读写能力测试的问题。这两名学生比规定的90分钟时限更快地完成了任务。具有认知反思风格的被试在解决问题时需要很长时间,但得到的结果往往是正确或准确的,而具有冲动性认知风格的被试似乎很匆忙地回答问题,往往是错误的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI NUMERASI MAHASISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF REFLEKTIF DAN IMPULSIF
During the Covid-19 pandemic, there was a change in the education system, namely regular or face-to-face Numerical literacy ability is the ability or skill in using various kinds of numbers and symbols related to basic mathematics to solve practical problems in the context of everyday life. This study aims to determine the numeracy literacy ability of students in solving math problems in terms of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. In looking at students' numeracy literacy skills, indicators of numeracy literacy abilities are used which are adjusted to the stages of the problem solving process. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 23 students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at the University of Papua. Data collection consisted of a numeracy literacy test, an MFFT (Matching Familiar Figure Test) test to determine cognitive style, interviews and documentation. The results of the MFFT test showed that there were 11 students with a reflective cognitive style, 9 students with an impulsive cognitive style, 1 student with a low accurate cognitive style, and 2 students with a fast accurate cognitive style. After that, 2 subjects with a reflective cognitive style were obtained which were supported by 2 subjects who had a tendency for a reflective cognitive style and 2 subjects who had an impulsive cognitive style. The results showed that the reflective subject one (SR1) the first reflective student completed the numeracy literacy problem in 91 minutes and the reflective subject two (SR2) completed the problem in 98 minutes, where the two subjects with the minute reflective style had exceeded the predetermined maximum time limit, namely 90 minutes. Impulsive subject one (SI1) completed the numeracy literacy test in 32 minutes. The second impulsive subject (SI2) completed the numeracy literacy test questions within 40 minutes. The two students completed it faster than the specified time limit of 90 minutes. Subjects with a cognitive-reflective style in solving problems take a long time but the results obtained tend to be correct or accurate, while subjects with an impulsive cognitive style seem to be in a hurry to answer and tend to be wrong
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信