用残余网络解释横向流动试验

Dena F. Mujtaba, N. Mahapatra
{"title":"用残余网络解释横向流动试验","authors":"Dena F. Mujtaba, N. Mahapatra","doi":"10.1109/CSCI54926.2021.00261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lateral flow tests (LFTs) are a cost-effective, quick, and frequently used testing method in many domains such as food safety and environmental and clinical applications. However, a major challenge is accurate interpretation of LFT results. Often, if a low level of target substance is present in the input liquid, the test line indicator may appear faint, causing a test interpreter to read the test result as a false negative. Therefore, to address this problem, we propose a deep-learning-based method to interpret images of LFT results. Our model is based on ResNet-101, a state-of-the-art image classification model that uses residual networks, or skip-connections between layers to improve learning on the training dataset. We further improve our model by using data augmentation to generate additional and more difficult images of LFTs for the model to learn from, thereby improving its performance and reducing overfitting to the training dataset. Our approach is also trained and tested on a dataset of SARS-CoV-2 LFT images, containing both positive and negative results. We compare our ResNet approach to a baseline convolutional neural network model. Our results show the ResNet model achieves a higher specificity and sensitivity than the baseline model to interpret LFT results.","PeriodicalId":206881,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral Flow Test Interpretation with Residual Networks\",\"authors\":\"Dena F. Mujtaba, N. Mahapatra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSCI54926.2021.00261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lateral flow tests (LFTs) are a cost-effective, quick, and frequently used testing method in many domains such as food safety and environmental and clinical applications. However, a major challenge is accurate interpretation of LFT results. Often, if a low level of target substance is present in the input liquid, the test line indicator may appear faint, causing a test interpreter to read the test result as a false negative. Therefore, to address this problem, we propose a deep-learning-based method to interpret images of LFT results. Our model is based on ResNet-101, a state-of-the-art image classification model that uses residual networks, or skip-connections between layers to improve learning on the training dataset. We further improve our model by using data augmentation to generate additional and more difficult images of LFTs for the model to learn from, thereby improving its performance and reducing overfitting to the training dataset. Our approach is also trained and tested on a dataset of SARS-CoV-2 LFT images, containing both positive and negative results. We compare our ResNet approach to a baseline convolutional neural network model. Our results show the ResNet model achieves a higher specificity and sensitivity than the baseline model to interpret LFT results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI54926.2021.00261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI54926.2021.00261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

横向流动测试(LFTs)是一种成本效益高、快速且在食品安全、环境和临床应用等许多领域经常使用的测试方法。然而,一个主要的挑战是LFT结果的准确解释。通常,如果输入液体中存在低水平的目标物质,测试线指示可能会出现微弱,导致测试口译员将测试结果读取为假阴性。因此,为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于深度学习的方法来解释LFT结果的图像。我们的模型基于ResNet-101,这是一种最先进的图像分类模型,它使用残差网络或层之间的跳过连接来改善训练数据集的学习。我们通过使用数据增强来进一步改进我们的模型,以生成额外的和更困难的LFTs图像供模型学习,从而提高其性能并减少对训练数据集的过拟合。我们的方法还在包含阳性和阴性结果的SARS-CoV-2 LFT图像数据集上进行了训练和测试。我们将我们的ResNet方法与基线卷积神经网络模型进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,在解释LFT结果时,ResNet模型比基线模型具有更高的特异性和敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral Flow Test Interpretation with Residual Networks
Lateral flow tests (LFTs) are a cost-effective, quick, and frequently used testing method in many domains such as food safety and environmental and clinical applications. However, a major challenge is accurate interpretation of LFT results. Often, if a low level of target substance is present in the input liquid, the test line indicator may appear faint, causing a test interpreter to read the test result as a false negative. Therefore, to address this problem, we propose a deep-learning-based method to interpret images of LFT results. Our model is based on ResNet-101, a state-of-the-art image classification model that uses residual networks, or skip-connections between layers to improve learning on the training dataset. We further improve our model by using data augmentation to generate additional and more difficult images of LFTs for the model to learn from, thereby improving its performance and reducing overfitting to the training dataset. Our approach is also trained and tested on a dataset of SARS-CoV-2 LFT images, containing both positive and negative results. We compare our ResNet approach to a baseline convolutional neural network model. Our results show the ResNet model achieves a higher specificity and sensitivity than the baseline model to interpret LFT results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信