使用黑盒测试对程序进行排名

Koen Claessen, John Hughes, Michal H. Palka, Nicholas Smallbone, Hans Svensson
{"title":"使用黑盒测试对程序进行排名","authors":"Koen Claessen, John Hughes, Michal H. Palka, Nicholas Smallbone, Hans Svensson","doi":"10.1145/1808266.1808282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an unbiased method for measuring the relative quality of different solutions to a programming problem. Our method is based on identifying possible bugs from program behaviour through black-box testing. The main motivation for such a method is its use in experimental evaluation of software development methods. We report on the use of our method in a small-scale such experiment, which was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of property-based testing vs. unit testing in software development.","PeriodicalId":443108,"journal":{"name":"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking programs using black box testing\",\"authors\":\"Koen Claessen, John Hughes, Michal H. Palka, Nicholas Smallbone, Hans Svensson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1808266.1808282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an unbiased method for measuring the relative quality of different solutions to a programming problem. Our method is based on identifying possible bugs from program behaviour through black-box testing. The main motivation for such a method is its use in experimental evaluation of software development methods. We report on the use of our method in a small-scale such experiment, which was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of property-based testing vs. unit testing in software development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1808266.1808282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1808266.1808282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们提出了一种无偏的方法来测量一个规划问题的不同解的相对质量。我们的方法是基于通过黑盒测试从程序行为中识别可能的错误。这种方法的主要动机是在软件开发方法的实验评估中使用它。我们在一个小规模的实验中报告了我们的方法的使用,该实验旨在评估软件开发中基于属性的测试与单元测试的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranking programs using black box testing
We present an unbiased method for measuring the relative quality of different solutions to a programming problem. Our method is based on identifying possible bugs from program behaviour through black-box testing. The main motivation for such a method is its use in experimental evaluation of software development methods. We report on the use of our method in a small-scale such experiment, which was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of property-based testing vs. unit testing in software development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信