基于共识度的多属性群决策方法

Jiaqing Wang, Xiangxin Meng, Zhengwei Dong, Hongbo Lu, Jianxun Sun
{"title":"基于共识度的多属性群决策方法","authors":"Jiaqing Wang, Xiangxin Meng, Zhengwei Dong, Hongbo Lu, Jianxun Sun","doi":"10.1109/ICINFA.2014.6932821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consensus building is a hot but difficult problem in the current research area of group decision making. If the group decision algorithm is not well designed, it will lead to the experts' opinions compromise to each other, and the final result will be the experts' mean opinions. It may be kind of safe, but too conservative to receive the few but creative and right opinions. In this paper, a group decision making approach based on PAM (Partitioning Around Medoids) and Particle swarm optimization was proposed. With this approach, we can promote the effective interactions among experts and deepen their task understandings by analyzing their opinions' conflicts, thereby, accelerating the convergence of group opinions, improving the efficiency of group decision making and the reliability of the results. In some cases the experts cannot reach consensus independently, but we can solve this problem with this approach by searching the optimal solution within the acceptable range given by expert groups, fine-tuning the original evaluation matrix, thus improving the success rate of group decision making.","PeriodicalId":427762,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A consensus degree based multiple attribute group decision making method\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqing Wang, Xiangxin Meng, Zhengwei Dong, Hongbo Lu, Jianxun Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICINFA.2014.6932821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consensus building is a hot but difficult problem in the current research area of group decision making. If the group decision algorithm is not well designed, it will lead to the experts' opinions compromise to each other, and the final result will be the experts' mean opinions. It may be kind of safe, but too conservative to receive the few but creative and right opinions. In this paper, a group decision making approach based on PAM (Partitioning Around Medoids) and Particle swarm optimization was proposed. With this approach, we can promote the effective interactions among experts and deepen their task understandings by analyzing their opinions' conflicts, thereby, accelerating the convergence of group opinions, improving the efficiency of group decision making and the reliability of the results. In some cases the experts cannot reach consensus independently, but we can solve this problem with this approach by searching the optimal solution within the acceptable range given by expert groups, fine-tuning the original evaluation matrix, thus improving the success rate of group decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2014.6932821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2014.6932821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

共识的建立是当前群体决策研究领域的热点和难点问题。如果群体决策算法设计得不好,就会导致专家的意见相互妥协,最终结果就是专家的平均意见。它可能有点安全,但太保守了,无法接受少数有创意和正确的意见。提出了一种基于粒子群优化和围绕介质划分的群决策方法。通过分析专家之间的意见冲突,促进专家之间的有效互动,加深专家对任务的理解,从而加快群体意见的趋同,提高群体决策的效率和结果的可靠性。在某些情况下,专家无法独立达成共识,但我们可以通过在专家组给出的可接受范围内搜索最优解,对原始评价矩阵进行微调,从而提高群体决策的成功率,从而解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A consensus degree based multiple attribute group decision making method
Consensus building is a hot but difficult problem in the current research area of group decision making. If the group decision algorithm is not well designed, it will lead to the experts' opinions compromise to each other, and the final result will be the experts' mean opinions. It may be kind of safe, but too conservative to receive the few but creative and right opinions. In this paper, a group decision making approach based on PAM (Partitioning Around Medoids) and Particle swarm optimization was proposed. With this approach, we can promote the effective interactions among experts and deepen their task understandings by analyzing their opinions' conflicts, thereby, accelerating the convergence of group opinions, improving the efficiency of group decision making and the reliability of the results. In some cases the experts cannot reach consensus independently, but we can solve this problem with this approach by searching the optimal solution within the acceptable range given by expert groups, fine-tuning the original evaluation matrix, thus improving the success rate of group decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信