比较极限编程和瀑布式项目的结果

Feng Ji, Todd Sedano
{"title":"比较极限编程和瀑布式项目的结果","authors":"Feng Ji, Todd Sedano","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waterfall and Extreme Programming are two software project methods used for project management. Although there are a number of opinions comparing the two methods regarding how they should be applied, none have used project data to clearly conclude which one is better. In this paper, we present the results of a controlled empirical study conducted at Carnegie Mellon University in Silicon Valley to learn about the effective transition from traditional development to agile development. We conducted a comparison research against these two approaches. Multiple teams were assigned a project; some used Waterfall development, others used Extreme Programming. The purpose of this research is to look at advantages and disadvantages based upon the outcomes, generated artifacts, and metrics produced by the teams.","PeriodicalId":318528,"journal":{"name":"2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing extreme programming and Waterfall project results\",\"authors\":\"Feng Ji, Todd Sedano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Waterfall and Extreme Programming are two software project methods used for project management. Although there are a number of opinions comparing the two methods regarding how they should be applied, none have used project data to clearly conclude which one is better. In this paper, we present the results of a controlled empirical study conducted at Carnegie Mellon University in Silicon Valley to learn about the effective transition from traditional development to agile development. We conducted a comparison research against these two approaches. Multiple teams were assigned a project; some used Waterfall development, others used Extreme Programming. The purpose of this research is to look at advantages and disadvantages based upon the outcomes, generated artifacts, and metrics produced by the teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

瀑布式和极限编程是两种用于项目管理的软件项目方法。虽然有很多关于如何应用这两种方法的比较意见,但没有人使用项目数据来清楚地得出哪一种方法更好。在本文中,我们提出了在硅谷卡内基梅隆大学进行的一项受控实证研究的结果,以了解从传统开发到敏捷开发的有效过渡。我们对这两种方法进行了比较研究。多个团队被分配一个项目;有些使用瀑布式开发,有些使用极限编程。这项研究的目的是根据结果、生成的工件和团队产生的度量来查看优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing extreme programming and Waterfall project results
Waterfall and Extreme Programming are two software project methods used for project management. Although there are a number of opinions comparing the two methods regarding how they should be applied, none have used project data to clearly conclude which one is better. In this paper, we present the results of a controlled empirical study conducted at Carnegie Mellon University in Silicon Valley to learn about the effective transition from traditional development to agile development. We conducted a comparison research against these two approaches. Multiple teams were assigned a project; some used Waterfall development, others used Extreme Programming. The purpose of this research is to look at advantages and disadvantages based upon the outcomes, generated artifacts, and metrics produced by the teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信