互动式员工培训研究中课内相关性的生成与运用

S. Silverstein, T. Jewell, Rodney Cony
{"title":"互动式员工培训研究中课内相关性的生成与运用","authors":"S. Silverstein, T. Jewell, Rodney Cony","doi":"10.1080/10973430208408444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Intraclass correlation (ICC) is an underutilized statistical technique in program consultation and program development research. One potential use is to quantitatively characterize the degree of similarity or difference among staff on a number of issues, and this can be a complement to the use of single items assessing perceived similarity between staff members. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of ICCs for quantifying agreement from both dichotomous and nondichotomous staff ratings. A number of issues in the calculation and use of ICCs are noted, especially pertaining to various forms of bias. Data generated from an ongoing Interactive Staff Training project demonstrated that: 1) different programs vary widely in their degree of staff consistency in perceptions and attitudes; 2) ICCs correlate highly with trainer perceptions of staff commitment to change at the sites receiving consultation, and with perceived level of rapport between trainers and staff; and 3) in many cases ICCs correlate differently with outcome variables compared to total scores on the same measures. In addition to providing an introduction to ICCs, instructions in their generation and explanations of output from two popular statistical packages are explained.","PeriodicalId":166369,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Generation and Use of Intraclass Correlation in Interactive Staff Training Research\",\"authors\":\"S. Silverstein, T. Jewell, Rodney Cony\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10973430208408444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Intraclass correlation (ICC) is an underutilized statistical technique in program consultation and program development research. One potential use is to quantitatively characterize the degree of similarity or difference among staff on a number of issues, and this can be a complement to the use of single items assessing perceived similarity between staff members. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of ICCs for quantifying agreement from both dichotomous and nondichotomous staff ratings. A number of issues in the calculation and use of ICCs are noted, especially pertaining to various forms of bias. Data generated from an ongoing Interactive Staff Training project demonstrated that: 1) different programs vary widely in their degree of staff consistency in perceptions and attitudes; 2) ICCs correlate highly with trainer perceptions of staff commitment to change at the sites receiving consultation, and with perceived level of rapport between trainers and staff; and 3) in many cases ICCs correlate differently with outcome variables compared to total scores on the same measures. In addition to providing an introduction to ICCs, instructions in their generation and explanations of output from two popular statistical packages are explained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10973430208408444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10973430208408444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类内相关(ICC)是一种在项目咨询和项目开发研究中未被充分利用的统计技术。一个可能的用途是定量地描述工作人员在若干问题上的相似或不同程度,这可以作为对使用单一项目评估工作人员之间感知到的相似程度的补充。在本文中,我们展示了使用ICCs来量化来自二分类和非二分类员工评级的协议。委员会注意到在计算和使用国际会计准则方面的一些问题,特别是与各种形式的偏见有关的问题。正在进行的交互式员工培训项目产生的数据表明:1)不同的项目在员工的看法和态度上的一致性程度差异很大;2) ICCs与培训师对接受咨询地点的工作人员变革承诺的看法高度相关,与培训师与工作人员之间的融洽程度高度相关;3)在许多情况下,与相同措施的总分相比,icc与结果变量的相关性不同。除了介绍国际统计指标外,还解释了编制国际统计指标的说明和两个流行统计软件包的输出说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Generation and Use of Intraclass Correlation in Interactive Staff Training Research
Abstract Intraclass correlation (ICC) is an underutilized statistical technique in program consultation and program development research. One potential use is to quantitatively characterize the degree of similarity or difference among staff on a number of issues, and this can be a complement to the use of single items assessing perceived similarity between staff members. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of ICCs for quantifying agreement from both dichotomous and nondichotomous staff ratings. A number of issues in the calculation and use of ICCs are noted, especially pertaining to various forms of bias. Data generated from an ongoing Interactive Staff Training project demonstrated that: 1) different programs vary widely in their degree of staff consistency in perceptions and attitudes; 2) ICCs correlate highly with trainer perceptions of staff commitment to change at the sites receiving consultation, and with perceived level of rapport between trainers and staff; and 3) in many cases ICCs correlate differently with outcome variables compared to total scores on the same measures. In addition to providing an introduction to ICCs, instructions in their generation and explanations of output from two popular statistical packages are explained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信