在标准生产力框架中核算温室气体

Tarek M. Harchaoui, Dmitry Kabrelyan, Robert B. Smith
{"title":"在标准生产力框架中核算温室气体","authors":"Tarek M. Harchaoui, Dmitry Kabrelyan, Robert B. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1403283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method that Canada and other developed countries use to measure productivity growth generally ignores the pollutants that are produced by the industrial process. For example, greenhouse gas emissions, though an inevitable consequence of production processes, are excluded from the productivity accounting framework. This study proposes an extended productivity measure that takes pollutants into account. It illustrates how it can be applied using carbon dioxide emissions. The proposed experimental measure is based on the standard multifactor productivity framework adjusted for the private cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Using this measure changes the estimate of productivity growth for the business sector. The paper first examines how industries have reduced their CO2 emissions relative to their saleable outputs over the last twenty years. This improvement is a form of efficiency gain. When this is taken into account using the new experimental methodology to estimate multifactor productivity, the estimate of productivity growth that is produced is about 17 percent higher than the conventional estimate over the period from 1981-1996.","PeriodicalId":133493,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Pollution (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for Greenhouse Gases in the Standard Productivity Framework\",\"authors\":\"Tarek M. Harchaoui, Dmitry Kabrelyan, Robert B. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1403283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The method that Canada and other developed countries use to measure productivity growth generally ignores the pollutants that are produced by the industrial process. For example, greenhouse gas emissions, though an inevitable consequence of production processes, are excluded from the productivity accounting framework. This study proposes an extended productivity measure that takes pollutants into account. It illustrates how it can be applied using carbon dioxide emissions. The proposed experimental measure is based on the standard multifactor productivity framework adjusted for the private cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Using this measure changes the estimate of productivity growth for the business sector. The paper first examines how industries have reduced their CO2 emissions relative to their saleable outputs over the last twenty years. This improvement is a form of efficiency gain. When this is taken into account using the new experimental methodology to estimate multifactor productivity, the estimate of productivity growth that is produced is about 17 percent higher than the conventional estimate over the period from 1981-1996.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Other Pollution (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Other Pollution (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1403283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Other Pollution (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1403283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

加拿大和其他发达国家用来衡量生产率增长的方法通常忽略了工业过程中产生的污染物。例如,温室气体排放虽然是生产过程不可避免的后果,但却被排除在生产率核算框架之外。这项研究提出了一种将污染物考虑在内的扩展生产率衡量标准。它说明了如何利用二氧化碳排放来应用它。提出的实验措施是基于标准的多要素生产率框架,并根据温室气体排放的私人成本进行调整。使用这一指标会改变对商业部门生产率增长的估计。这篇论文首先考察了在过去的二十年中,工业是如何相对于其可销售产出减少其二氧化碳排放量的。这种改进是效率提高的一种形式。当使用新的实验方法来估计多因素生产率时,对1981-1996年期间生产的生产率增长的估计比传统估计高出约17%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accounting for Greenhouse Gases in the Standard Productivity Framework
The method that Canada and other developed countries use to measure productivity growth generally ignores the pollutants that are produced by the industrial process. For example, greenhouse gas emissions, though an inevitable consequence of production processes, are excluded from the productivity accounting framework. This study proposes an extended productivity measure that takes pollutants into account. It illustrates how it can be applied using carbon dioxide emissions. The proposed experimental measure is based on the standard multifactor productivity framework adjusted for the private cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Using this measure changes the estimate of productivity growth for the business sector. The paper first examines how industries have reduced their CO2 emissions relative to their saleable outputs over the last twenty years. This improvement is a form of efficiency gain. When this is taken into account using the new experimental methodology to estimate multifactor productivity, the estimate of productivity growth that is produced is about 17 percent higher than the conventional estimate over the period from 1981-1996.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信