A. Capponi, C. Pilotto, G. Golino, A. Farina, Lance M. Kaplan
{"title":"分布式跟踪中主动传感器的选择算法:飞盘与GNS方法的比较","authors":"A. Capponi, C. Pilotto, G. Golino, A. Farina, Lance M. Kaplan","doi":"10.1109/ICIF.2006.301592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two different approaches for sensor selection for distributed tracking: 1) the Frisbee method, and 2) global node selection (GNS). The Frisbee method is based on the proximity of the nodes to the predicted location of the target; GNS is based on minimizing the unbiased Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that the Frisbee method is as effective as GNS. Furthermore, the Frisbee method is attractive due to its very light computational load","PeriodicalId":248061,"journal":{"name":"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion","volume":"299 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithms for the selection of the active sensors in distributed tracking: comparison between Frisbee and GNS methods\",\"authors\":\"A. Capponi, C. Pilotto, G. Golino, A. Farina, Lance M. Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIF.2006.301592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares two different approaches for sensor selection for distributed tracking: 1) the Frisbee method, and 2) global node selection (GNS). The Frisbee method is based on the proximity of the nodes to the predicted location of the target; GNS is based on minimizing the unbiased Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that the Frisbee method is as effective as GNS. Furthermore, the Frisbee method is attractive due to its very light computational load\",\"PeriodicalId\":248061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion\",\"volume\":\"299 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2006.301592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2006.301592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Algorithms for the selection of the active sensors in distributed tracking: comparison between Frisbee and GNS methods
This paper compares two different approaches for sensor selection for distributed tracking: 1) the Frisbee method, and 2) global node selection (GNS). The Frisbee method is based on the proximity of the nodes to the predicted location of the target; GNS is based on minimizing the unbiased Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that the Frisbee method is as effective as GNS. Furthermore, the Frisbee method is attractive due to its very light computational load
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
