{"title":"几种不同可用性评估方法的成本和效果比较:课堂案例研究","authors":"R. Grice","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students in a class on usability testing were presented with four methods of testing and evaluating product usability. Each group of students used the four methods to evaluate a product of their choosing, and reported the results of each test and a comparison of the relative effectiveness of each method. Some suggestions for combining evaluation methods for maximum impact are offered.","PeriodicalId":439913,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cost and effectiveness of several different usability evaluation methods: a classroom case study\",\"authors\":\"R. Grice\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students in a class on usability testing were presented with four methods of testing and evaluating product usability. Each group of students used the four methods to evaluate a product of their choosing, and reported the results of each test and a comparison of the relative effectiveness of each method. Some suggestions for combining evaluation methods for maximum impact are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of cost and effectiveness of several different usability evaluation methods: a classroom case study
Students in a class on usability testing were presented with four methods of testing and evaluating product usability. Each group of students used the four methods to evaluate a product of their choosing, and reported the results of each test and a comparison of the relative effectiveness of each method. Some suggestions for combining evaluation methods for maximum impact are offered.