生物信息学工具的可重复性

2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW) Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00046

P. Baykal, N. Beerenwinkel, S. Mangul

{"title":"生物信息学工具的可重复性","authors":"P. Baykal, N. Beerenwinkel, S. Mangul","doi":"10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a fast and scalable method to assess reproducibility of bioinformatics tools. We replace replicates which are cause of data variation by synthetic replicates. To assess reproducibility of bioinformatics tools, we run the tools with two different types of synthetic replicates and compare results obtained from the original data. Results show differences between output obtained from original data and synthetic replicates.","PeriodicalId":286968,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of Bioinformatics Tools\",\"authors\":\"P. Baykal, N. Beerenwinkel, S. Mangul\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a fast and scalable method to assess reproducibility of bioinformatics tools. We replace replicates which are cause of data variation by synthetic replicates. To assess reproducibility of bioinformatics tools, we run the tools with two different types of synthetic replicates and compare results obtained from the original data. Results show differences between output obtained from original data and synthetic replicates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了一种快速和可扩展的方法来评估生物信息学工具的可重复性。我们用合成的重复来代替导致数据变化的重复。为了评估生物信息学工具的可重复性，我们在两种不同类型的合成重复中运行了这些工具，并比较了从原始数据中获得的结果。结果表明，原始数据与合成重复数据的输出结果存在差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reproducibility of Bioinformatics Tools

We introduce a fast and scalable method to assess reproducibility of bioinformatics tools. We replace replicates which are cause of data variation by synthetic replicates. To assess reproducibility of bioinformatics tools, we run the tools with two different types of synthetic replicates and compare results obtained from the original data. Results show differences between output obtained from original data and synthetic replicates.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)

自引率

0.00%

发文量