重新考虑拉内费夫金字塔群中被囚禁的雕像

Tara Prakash
{"title":"重新考虑拉内费夫金字塔群中被囚禁的雕像","authors":"Tara Prakash","doi":"10.5913/JARCE.54.2018.A012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous scholars have hypothesized that a group of nine wooden statuettes of bound foreign captives from the funerary temple of Raneferef had originally been part of an article of furniture, most likely a royal throne. This article reassesses these arguments. Visual analysis suggests that four different artists, who were working within two distinct groups or “workshops,” carved the statuettes. As a result, it seems most likely that the statuettes were actually part of two different objects. Moreover, comparison with preserved chairs and thrones, as well as ancient images of them, demonstrates that the Raneferef captives do not readily fit this context. Rather, most likely the statuettes had been part of two statue naoi or shrines. \n  \ndoi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5913/jarce.54.2018.a012","PeriodicalId":341132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering the Bound Captive Statuettes from the Pyramid Complex of Raneferef\",\"authors\":\"Tara Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.5913/JARCE.54.2018.A012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous scholars have hypothesized that a group of nine wooden statuettes of bound foreign captives from the funerary temple of Raneferef had originally been part of an article of furniture, most likely a royal throne. This article reassesses these arguments. Visual analysis suggests that four different artists, who were working within two distinct groups or “workshops,” carved the statuettes. As a result, it seems most likely that the statuettes were actually part of two different objects. Moreover, comparison with preserved chairs and thrones, as well as ancient images of them, demonstrates that the Raneferef captives do not readily fit this context. Rather, most likely the statuettes had been part of two statue naoi or shrines. \\n  \\ndoi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5913/jarce.54.2018.a012\",\"PeriodicalId\":341132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5913/JARCE.54.2018.A012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5913/JARCE.54.2018.A012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

之前有学者猜测,拉内费里夫丧葬神庙中发现的9个绑在一起的外国俘虏木制雕像最初是一件家具的一部分,很可能是皇室宝座。本文重新评估了这些论点。视觉分析表明,四位不同的艺术家在两个不同的小组或“工作室”中雕刻了这些小雕像。因此,这些小雕像很可能是两个不同物体的一部分。此外,与保存下来的椅子和宝座以及它们的古代图像进行比较,表明拉内费夫俘虏并不完全符合这一背景。更确切地说,这些小雕像很可能是两个雕像或神殿的一部分。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5913/jarce.54.2018.a012
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconsidering the Bound Captive Statuettes from the Pyramid Complex of Raneferef
Previous scholars have hypothesized that a group of nine wooden statuettes of bound foreign captives from the funerary temple of Raneferef had originally been part of an article of furniture, most likely a royal throne. This article reassesses these arguments. Visual analysis suggests that four different artists, who were working within two distinct groups or “workshops,” carved the statuettes. As a result, it seems most likely that the statuettes were actually part of two different objects. Moreover, comparison with preserved chairs and thrones, as well as ancient images of them, demonstrates that the Raneferef captives do not readily fit this context. Rather, most likely the statuettes had been part of two statue naoi or shrines.   doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5913/jarce.54.2018.a012
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信