儿童口腔健康自我报告和建议标准的协议

Y. Qingping, Liu Min, Zhao Mei, Chen Wei, C. Chun
{"title":"儿童口腔健康自我报告和建议标准的协议","authors":"Y. Qingping, Liu Min, Zhao Mei, Chen Wei, C. Chun","doi":"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To analyze the consistency between self-reported oral health and proposed standard in evaluating children oral health status, and to test whether self-reported oral health can be used in children population. Methods The clinical examination data and questionnaire data were 2 158 children aged 12-year-old in Beijing, China. Child oral health status was measured by self-reported oral health and proposed standard from World Health Organization (WHO), and was classified into \"good, general, poor” based on each method. Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of two measurements. Using multivariate nonordinal logistic regression to identify the influencing factors of self-reported oral health, and to explore the possible reasons for the consistency differences of two measurements. Results According to the WHO standard, 25.5%, 65.3% and 9.2% children oral health were rated as good, general and poor, respectively. The proportion was 50.6%, 37.7% and 11.8% respectively based on self-report method. Kappa value for two measurements was 0.04, indicating poor agreement between two methods. Results from regression model show that both the untreated caries ( OR = 2.47, P <0.01) and toothache ( OR = 3.54, P <0.01) were associated with self-reported oral health, while not observed in periodontal health ( OR = 1.34, P = 0.18) and oral hygiene status ( OR = 0.95, P = 0.75). Conclusion Self-reported oral health results can reflect caries status to some extents among children, but it failed to reflect other aspects, such as periodontal health status and oral hygiene. Self-reported oral health among children should be considered based on the requirements of assessment content and accuracy in the future work. 【摘要】 目的 分析口腔健康自我评价和世界卫生组织推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况评估结果的一致性, 为口腔健康自 我评价在儿童群体中的使用提供依据。 方法  对北京市2 158名12岁儿童临床口腔检查和问卷调查的数据进行分析。 使用口腔健康自我评价和WHO推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况进行评估, 评估结果均分为“好、中、差”3个等级。运用 Kappa分析进行一致性评价;运用多因素Logistic回归分析了解儿童口腔健康自我评价的影响因素。 结果 根据WHO的 推荐标准, 儿童口腔健康好、中、差的比例分别为25.5%, 65.3%, 9.2%;儿童口腔健康自评结果为好、中、差的比例分别为 50.6%, 37.7%, 11.8%。两种方法对儿童口腔健康结果评价的 Kappa 值为0.04,一致性较差。回归分析结果显示, 开放性龋 洞 ( OR = 2.47, P <0.01)和牙疼 ( OR = 3.54, P <0.01)均是儿童口腔健康自评的影响因素;而牙周健康 ( OR = 1.34, P = 0.18)和 口腔清洁状况 ( OR = 0.95, P =0.75)对自评结果的影响无统计学意义。 结论 儿童口腔健康自我评价结果能在一定程度上 反映群体龋病状况差异, 但难以反映儿童牙周和口腔清洁方面的健康状况。应根据工作内容和评估的精准度要求, 考虑口 腔健康自我评价工具在儿童群体的使用。","PeriodicalId":106801,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of School Health","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement of self-reported and proposed standard on oral health among children\",\"authors\":\"Y. Qingping, Liu Min, Zhao Mei, Chen Wei, C. Chun\",\"doi\":\"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To analyze the consistency between self-reported oral health and proposed standard in evaluating children oral health status, and to test whether self-reported oral health can be used in children population. Methods The clinical examination data and questionnaire data were 2 158 children aged 12-year-old in Beijing, China. Child oral health status was measured by self-reported oral health and proposed standard from World Health Organization (WHO), and was classified into \\\"good, general, poor” based on each method. Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of two measurements. Using multivariate nonordinal logistic regression to identify the influencing factors of self-reported oral health, and to explore the possible reasons for the consistency differences of two measurements. Results According to the WHO standard, 25.5%, 65.3% and 9.2% children oral health were rated as good, general and poor, respectively. The proportion was 50.6%, 37.7% and 11.8% respectively based on self-report method. Kappa value for two measurements was 0.04, indicating poor agreement between two methods. Results from regression model show that both the untreated caries ( OR = 2.47, P <0.01) and toothache ( OR = 3.54, P <0.01) were associated with self-reported oral health, while not observed in periodontal health ( OR = 1.34, P = 0.18) and oral hygiene status ( OR = 0.95, P = 0.75). Conclusion Self-reported oral health results can reflect caries status to some extents among children, but it failed to reflect other aspects, such as periodontal health status and oral hygiene. Self-reported oral health among children should be considered based on the requirements of assessment content and accuracy in the future work. 【摘要】 目的 分析口腔健康自我评价和世界卫生组织推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况评估结果的一致性, 为口腔健康自 我评价在儿童群体中的使用提供依据。 方法  对北京市2 158名12岁儿童临床口腔检查和问卷调查的数据进行分析。 使用口腔健康自我评价和WHO推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况进行评估, 评估结果均分为“好、中、差”3个等级。运用 Kappa分析进行一致性评价;运用多因素Logistic回归分析了解儿童口腔健康自我评价的影响因素。 结果 根据WHO的 推荐标准, 儿童口腔健康好、中、差的比例分别为25.5%, 65.3%, 9.2%;儿童口腔健康自评结果为好、中、差的比例分别为 50.6%, 37.7%, 11.8%。两种方法对儿童口腔健康结果评价的 Kappa 值为0.04,一致性较差。回归分析结果显示, 开放性龋 洞 ( OR = 2.47, P <0.01)和牙疼 ( OR = 3.54, P <0.01)均是儿童口腔健康自评的影响因素;而牙周健康 ( OR = 1.34, P = 0.18)和 口腔清洁状况 ( OR = 0.95, P =0.75)对自评结果的影响无统计学意义。 结论 儿童口腔健康自我评价结果能在一定程度上 反映群体龋病状况差异, 但难以反映儿童牙周和口腔清洁方面的健康状况。应根据工作内容和评估的精准度要求, 考虑口 腔健康自我评价工具在儿童群体的使用。\",\"PeriodicalId\":106801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of School Health\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of School Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析自评口腔健康状况与现行标准评价儿童口腔健康状况的一致性,检验自评口腔健康状况是否可以在儿童人群中使用。方法对北京市2 158名12岁儿童进行临床检查和问卷调查。采用自我报告口腔健康和世界卫生组织(WHO)建议标准对儿童口腔健康状况进行测量,并根据每种方法将儿童口腔健康状况分为“良好、一般、差”。采用Kappa检验评价两个测量值的一致性。采用多变量非序数逻辑回归分析口腔健康自我报告的影响因素,探讨两项测量结果一致性差异的可能原因。结果按照WHO标准,儿童口腔健康状况良好、一般和差的比例分别为25.5%、65.3%和9.2%。自述法的比例分别为50.6%、37.7%和11.8%。两次测量的Kappa值为0.04,表明两种方法的一致性较差。回归模型结果显示,未治疗的龋病(OR = 2.47, P <0.01)和牙痛(OR = 3.54, P <0.01)与自述口腔健康相关,而牙周健康(OR = 1.34, P = 0.18)和口腔卫生状况(OR = 0.95, P = 0.75)与自述口腔健康无关。结论自述口腔健康结果能在一定程度上反映儿童龋病状况,但不能反映牙周健康状况、口腔卫生状况等其他方面。在今后的工作中,应根据评估内容和准确性的要求考虑儿童口腔健康自我报告。【摘要】 目的 分析口腔健康自我评价和世界卫生组织推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况评估结果的一致性, 为口腔健康自 我评价在儿童群体中的使用提供依据。 方法  对北京市2 158名12岁儿童临床口腔检查和问卷调查的数据进行分析。 使用口腔健康自我评价和谁推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况进行评估,评估结果均分为“好、中、差”3个等级。运用卡巴分析进行一致性评价;运用多因素物流回归分析了解儿童口腔健康自我评价的影响因素。结果根据他的推荐标准,儿童口腔健康好,中,差的比例分别为25.5%,65.3%,9.2%;儿童口腔健康自评结果为好,中,差的比例分别为50.6%,37.7%,11.8%。卡帕:0.04,回归分析结果显示,开放性龋洞(或= 2.47,P < 0.01)和牙疼(或= 3.54,P < 0.01)均是儿童口腔健康自评的影响因素,而牙周健康(或= 1.34,P = 0.18)和口腔清洁状况(或= 0.95,P = 0.75)对自评结果的影响无统计学意义。结论 儿童口腔健康自我评价结果能在一定程度上 反映群体龋病状况差异, 但难以反映儿童牙周和口腔清洁方面的健康状况。应根据工作内容和评估的精准度要求, 考虑口 腔健康自我评价工具在儿童群体的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement of self-reported and proposed standard on oral health among children
Objective To analyze the consistency between self-reported oral health and proposed standard in evaluating children oral health status, and to test whether self-reported oral health can be used in children population. Methods The clinical examination data and questionnaire data were 2 158 children aged 12-year-old in Beijing, China. Child oral health status was measured by self-reported oral health and proposed standard from World Health Organization (WHO), and was classified into "good, general, poor” based on each method. Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of two measurements. Using multivariate nonordinal logistic regression to identify the influencing factors of self-reported oral health, and to explore the possible reasons for the consistency differences of two measurements. Results According to the WHO standard, 25.5%, 65.3% and 9.2% children oral health were rated as good, general and poor, respectively. The proportion was 50.6%, 37.7% and 11.8% respectively based on self-report method. Kappa value for two measurements was 0.04, indicating poor agreement between two methods. Results from regression model show that both the untreated caries ( OR = 2.47, P <0.01) and toothache ( OR = 3.54, P <0.01) were associated with self-reported oral health, while not observed in periodontal health ( OR = 1.34, P = 0.18) and oral hygiene status ( OR = 0.95, P = 0.75). Conclusion Self-reported oral health results can reflect caries status to some extents among children, but it failed to reflect other aspects, such as periodontal health status and oral hygiene. Self-reported oral health among children should be considered based on the requirements of assessment content and accuracy in the future work. 【摘要】 目的 分析口腔健康自我评价和世界卫生组织推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况评估结果的一致性, 为口腔健康自 我评价在儿童群体中的使用提供依据。 方法  对北京市2 158名12岁儿童临床口腔检查和问卷调查的数据进行分析。 使用口腔健康自我评价和WHO推荐标准对儿童口腔健康状况进行评估, 评估结果均分为“好、中、差”3个等级。运用 Kappa分析进行一致性评价;运用多因素Logistic回归分析了解儿童口腔健康自我评价的影响因素。 结果 根据WHO的 推荐标准, 儿童口腔健康好、中、差的比例分别为25.5%, 65.3%, 9.2%;儿童口腔健康自评结果为好、中、差的比例分别为 50.6%, 37.7%, 11.8%。两种方法对儿童口腔健康结果评价的 Kappa 值为0.04,一致性较差。回归分析结果显示, 开放性龋 洞 ( OR = 2.47, P <0.01)和牙疼 ( OR = 3.54, P <0.01)均是儿童口腔健康自评的影响因素;而牙周健康 ( OR = 1.34, P = 0.18)和 口腔清洁状况 ( OR = 0.95, P =0.75)对自评结果的影响无统计学意义。 结论 儿童口腔健康自我评价结果能在一定程度上 反映群体龋病状况差异, 但难以反映儿童牙周和口腔清洁方面的健康状况。应根据工作内容和评估的精准度要求, 考虑口 腔健康自我评价工具在儿童群体的使用。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信