VWAP基准下的最优极限与市场订单切片-连续情况

T. Li
{"title":"VWAP基准下的最优极限与市场订单切片-连续情况","authors":"T. Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2318896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic brokers benchmarked to TWAP or VWAP face a limit-order market-order tradeoff when slicing orders. Executing market orders keeps them on schedule but is costly. Executing limit orders saves spread but can lead to schedule slippage. We build on our results in the discrete shares case Li [2012] to present an optimal solution for execution in light of this tradeoff in the limit of continuous shares. As in the discrete case, the optimal solution is described in terms of a forward and backward boundary which define how many limit orders should be placed on the order book and when to execute market orders. Closed-form solutions for the boundaries are derived for the “stationary limit.” These boundaries can be computed numerically in the general case.","PeriodicalId":374208,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Limit-versus-Market Order Slicing Under a VWAP Benchmark - Continuous Case\",\"authors\":\"T. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2318896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Algorithmic brokers benchmarked to TWAP or VWAP face a limit-order market-order tradeoff when slicing orders. Executing market orders keeps them on schedule but is costly. Executing limit orders saves spread but can lead to schedule slippage. We build on our results in the discrete shares case Li [2012] to present an optimal solution for execution in light of this tradeoff in the limit of continuous shares. As in the discrete case, the optimal solution is described in terms of a forward and backward boundary which define how many limit orders should be placed on the order book and when to execute market orders. Closed-form solutions for the boundaries are derived for the “stationary limit.” These boundaries can be computed numerically in the general case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2318896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2318896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以TWAP或VWAP为基准的算法代理在分割订单时面临限价市场-订单权衡。执行市场指令可以使它们按期执行,但代价高昂。执行限价单可以节省点差,但可能导致进度下滑。我们以离散股票案例Li[2012]的结果为基础,根据连续股票限制下的这种权衡,提出了执行的最佳解决方案。在离散情况下,最优解被描述为向前和向后边界,它定义了应该在订单簿上放置多少限价订单以及何时执行市场订单。对于“平稳极限”,导出了边界的封闭解。在一般情况下,这些边界可以用数值计算出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Limit-versus-Market Order Slicing Under a VWAP Benchmark - Continuous Case
Algorithmic brokers benchmarked to TWAP or VWAP face a limit-order market-order tradeoff when slicing orders. Executing market orders keeps them on schedule but is costly. Executing limit orders saves spread but can lead to schedule slippage. We build on our results in the discrete shares case Li [2012] to present an optimal solution for execution in light of this tradeoff in the limit of continuous shares. As in the discrete case, the optimal solution is described in terms of a forward and backward boundary which define how many limit orders should be placed on the order book and when to execute market orders. Closed-form solutions for the boundaries are derived for the “stationary limit.” These boundaries can be computed numerically in the general case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信