艾米莉·狄金森的《雄辩的谎言》

E. McAlpine
{"title":"艾米莉·狄金森的《雄辩的谎言》","authors":"E. McAlpine","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvt1sg53.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explains that, like Clare, Emily Dickinson makes her fair share of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other kinds of mistakes, but her style sometimes masquerades as error too. Mostly unpublished during her lifetime, her poems were first made public after her death and under the influence of a strong editorial hand. In their original form on scraps of paper, in letters, and in hand-sewn “fascicles,” they seem to exhibit mistake at every turn. But because they constitute instances of private expression, these improprieties can seem to belong to a set of personal norms not quite subject to the standards of the day. However, Dickinson herself was cognizant of her breaches, often confessing them in letters and sometimes even within the poems themselves. The chapter then determines how Dickinson's own admissions of “wrongness” complicate one's readings of her poetry's mistakes. Does the poet's complicity undo her solecisms, or can awareness coexist with error? The chapter suggests the possibility of reading much of her wrongdoing nevertheless as mistake; the difference between knowing better and doing better may, for Dickinson, be a difference in degree rather than in kind.","PeriodicalId":163507,"journal":{"name":"The Poet's Mistake","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emily Dickinson’s Eloquent Lies\",\"authors\":\"E. McAlpine\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvt1sg53.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explains that, like Clare, Emily Dickinson makes her fair share of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other kinds of mistakes, but her style sometimes masquerades as error too. Mostly unpublished during her lifetime, her poems were first made public after her death and under the influence of a strong editorial hand. In their original form on scraps of paper, in letters, and in hand-sewn “fascicles,” they seem to exhibit mistake at every turn. But because they constitute instances of private expression, these improprieties can seem to belong to a set of personal norms not quite subject to the standards of the day. However, Dickinson herself was cognizant of her breaches, often confessing them in letters and sometimes even within the poems themselves. The chapter then determines how Dickinson's own admissions of “wrongness” complicate one's readings of her poetry's mistakes. Does the poet's complicity undo her solecisms, or can awareness coexist with error? The chapter suggests the possibility of reading much of her wrongdoing nevertheless as mistake; the difference between knowing better and doing better may, for Dickinson, be a difference in degree rather than in kind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Poet's Mistake\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Poet's Mistake\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sg53.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Poet's Mistake","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sg53.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章解释说,像克莱尔一样,艾米丽·狄金森也犯了语法、拼写、标点和其他类型的错误,但她的风格有时也会伪装成错误。她的诗大多在生前未发表,但在她死后,在强大的编辑的影响下,她的诗首次公开发表。它们的原始形式是在纸片上,在信件中,在手工缝制的“小册子”中,它们似乎处处都有错误。但是,因为它们构成了私人表达的实例,这些不当行为似乎属于一套不太受当今标准约束的个人规范。然而,狄金森自己也意识到自己的过错,经常在信中承认,有时甚至在诗中承认。然后,这一章决定了狄金森自己对“错误”的承认如何使人们对她诗歌错误的解读变得复杂。是诗人的共谋消除了她的错误,还是意识可以与错误共存?这一章暗示了一种可能性,即把她的大部分过错解读为错误;对狄金森来说,知道得更好和做得更好之间的区别可能是程度上的差异,而不是性质上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emily Dickinson’s Eloquent Lies
This chapter explains that, like Clare, Emily Dickinson makes her fair share of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other kinds of mistakes, but her style sometimes masquerades as error too. Mostly unpublished during her lifetime, her poems were first made public after her death and under the influence of a strong editorial hand. In their original form on scraps of paper, in letters, and in hand-sewn “fascicles,” they seem to exhibit mistake at every turn. But because they constitute instances of private expression, these improprieties can seem to belong to a set of personal norms not quite subject to the standards of the day. However, Dickinson herself was cognizant of her breaches, often confessing them in letters and sometimes even within the poems themselves. The chapter then determines how Dickinson's own admissions of “wrongness” complicate one's readings of her poetry's mistakes. Does the poet's complicity undo her solecisms, or can awareness coexist with error? The chapter suggests the possibility of reading much of her wrongdoing nevertheless as mistake; the difference between knowing better and doing better may, for Dickinson, be a difference in degree rather than in kind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信