上坡结构的第一年脊相互作用:新方法

K. Croasdale, T. Brown, George Li, W. Spring
{"title":"上坡结构的第一年脊相互作用:新方法","authors":"K. Croasdale, T. Brown, George Li, W. Spring","doi":"10.4043/29176-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Numerous field studies show that mature first-year (FY) ridges consist of a solid ice consolidated layer (CL) below which is a keel of ice rubble. The CL is generally thicker than the ambient level ice. With the decrease in multi-year ice in the Arctic, FY ridges may become the controlling ice feature at many Arctic locations. In sub-Arctic regions ridges are smaller but they also usually control design ice loads. For vertical structures, ISO 19906 (Standard on Arctic Offshore Structures) suggests calculating the load due to crushing of the CL and adding this to the load to fail the keel. In ISO a formula is provided for the load to fail the keel on a vertical-face which assumes that the keel material has Mohr-Coulomb properties. No specific algorithms are given in ISO for FY ridge loads on sloping structures. The work described in this paper addresses this gap.\n The study investigated three bounding methods and compared them with the measured loads due to FY ridges on Confederation Bridge (which has piers with upward breaking cones). The three bounding methods are: Model A; which assumes the CL breaks in bending and rides up as level ice and the keel load is calculated assuming a \"dead wedge\" is created on the slope which converts the slope into a vertical face against which the keel fails. This model can make use of the methods in ISO 19906 for calculating these two components and can be considered to be the implied \"current ISO approach\". Model B assumes that the CL layer fails in bending as \"level ice\" on an elastic foundation and rides up the slope with the accompaniment of additional ice rubble scooped-up from the sail and keel of the ridge. Model C assumes that the FY ridge can be idealized into an equivalent \"solid ice\" beam using composite beam theory. Then the beam on elastic foundation method, as used for solid ridges, is used to estimate breaking and clearing loads.\n These various approaches are reviewed and the derived loads are compared to failure modes and measured loads from Confederation Bridge for selected events involving FY ridges. Based on these comparisons a hybrid of Models B and C is recommended and the paper gives the details of how to apply this method.\n When used for example structures, the new model gives loads which are 40 – 50% lower than the current approach implied in ISO 19906. The method can be adapted to downward sloping structures.","PeriodicalId":391061,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 07, 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Year Ridge Interaction on Upward Sloping Structures: A New Approach\",\"authors\":\"K. Croasdale, T. Brown, George Li, W. Spring\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29176-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Numerous field studies show that mature first-year (FY) ridges consist of a solid ice consolidated layer (CL) below which is a keel of ice rubble. The CL is generally thicker than the ambient level ice. With the decrease in multi-year ice in the Arctic, FY ridges may become the controlling ice feature at many Arctic locations. In sub-Arctic regions ridges are smaller but they also usually control design ice loads. For vertical structures, ISO 19906 (Standard on Arctic Offshore Structures) suggests calculating the load due to crushing of the CL and adding this to the load to fail the keel. In ISO a formula is provided for the load to fail the keel on a vertical-face which assumes that the keel material has Mohr-Coulomb properties. No specific algorithms are given in ISO for FY ridge loads on sloping structures. The work described in this paper addresses this gap.\\n The study investigated three bounding methods and compared them with the measured loads due to FY ridges on Confederation Bridge (which has piers with upward breaking cones). The three bounding methods are: Model A; which assumes the CL breaks in bending and rides up as level ice and the keel load is calculated assuming a \\\"dead wedge\\\" is created on the slope which converts the slope into a vertical face against which the keel fails. This model can make use of the methods in ISO 19906 for calculating these two components and can be considered to be the implied \\\"current ISO approach\\\". Model B assumes that the CL layer fails in bending as \\\"level ice\\\" on an elastic foundation and rides up the slope with the accompaniment of additional ice rubble scooped-up from the sail and keel of the ridge. Model C assumes that the FY ridge can be idealized into an equivalent \\\"solid ice\\\" beam using composite beam theory. Then the beam on elastic foundation method, as used for solid ridges, is used to estimate breaking and clearing loads.\\n These various approaches are reviewed and the derived loads are compared to failure modes and measured loads from Confederation Bridge for selected events involving FY ridges. Based on these comparisons a hybrid of Models B and C is recommended and the paper gives the details of how to apply this method.\\n When used for example structures, the new model gives loads which are 40 – 50% lower than the current approach implied in ISO 19906. The method can be adapted to downward sloping structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 07, 2018\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 07, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29176-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 07, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29176-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大量的实地研究表明,成熟的第一年(FY)脊由一个坚实的冰固结层(CL)组成,下面是冰碎石的龙骨。CL一般比环境冰厚。随着北极多年冰的减少,FY脊可能成为北极许多地区的控制冰特征。在亚北极地区,山脊较小,但它们通常也控制着设计冰荷载。对于垂直结构,ISO 19906(北极海洋结构标准)建议计算由于CL的破碎而产生的载荷,并将其添加到龙骨破坏的载荷中。在假定龙骨材料具有莫尔-库仑特性的前提下,给出了龙骨在垂直面上受荷载破坏的公式。在ISO中没有给出斜坡结构的FY脊荷载的具体算法。本文所描述的工作解决了这一差距。研究了三种边界法,并将其与联邦大桥(具有向上断裂锥墩的桥墩)FY脊的实测荷载进行了比较。三种边界方法分别是:模型A;它假设CL在弯曲中断裂,并以水平冰的形式上升,龙骨载荷的计算假设在斜坡上产生了一个“死楔”,将斜坡转化为龙骨失效的垂直面。这个模型可以利用ISO 19906中的方法来计算这两个组成部分,可以被认为是隐含的“当前ISO方法”。模型B假设CL层在弹性基础上不能像“水平冰”那样弯曲,并伴随着从山脊的帆和龙骨上铲起的额外冰碎石沿着斜坡向上移动。模型C假定FY脊可以用复合梁理论理想化为等效的“固体冰”梁。在此基础上,采用基于弹性地基的梁法,计算了梁的断裂和清除荷载。对这些不同的方法进行了回顾,并将导出的载荷与联邦桥中涉及FY脊的选定事件的破坏模式和测量载荷进行了比较。基于这些比较,推荐了一种混合模式B和C,并给出了如何应用这种方法的细节。当用于例如结构时,新模型给出的载荷比ISO 19906中隐含的当前方法低40 - 50%。该方法适用于向下倾斜的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Year Ridge Interaction on Upward Sloping Structures: A New Approach
Numerous field studies show that mature first-year (FY) ridges consist of a solid ice consolidated layer (CL) below which is a keel of ice rubble. The CL is generally thicker than the ambient level ice. With the decrease in multi-year ice in the Arctic, FY ridges may become the controlling ice feature at many Arctic locations. In sub-Arctic regions ridges are smaller but they also usually control design ice loads. For vertical structures, ISO 19906 (Standard on Arctic Offshore Structures) suggests calculating the load due to crushing of the CL and adding this to the load to fail the keel. In ISO a formula is provided for the load to fail the keel on a vertical-face which assumes that the keel material has Mohr-Coulomb properties. No specific algorithms are given in ISO for FY ridge loads on sloping structures. The work described in this paper addresses this gap. The study investigated three bounding methods and compared them with the measured loads due to FY ridges on Confederation Bridge (which has piers with upward breaking cones). The three bounding methods are: Model A; which assumes the CL breaks in bending and rides up as level ice and the keel load is calculated assuming a "dead wedge" is created on the slope which converts the slope into a vertical face against which the keel fails. This model can make use of the methods in ISO 19906 for calculating these two components and can be considered to be the implied "current ISO approach". Model B assumes that the CL layer fails in bending as "level ice" on an elastic foundation and rides up the slope with the accompaniment of additional ice rubble scooped-up from the sail and keel of the ridge. Model C assumes that the FY ridge can be idealized into an equivalent "solid ice" beam using composite beam theory. Then the beam on elastic foundation method, as used for solid ridges, is used to estimate breaking and clearing loads. These various approaches are reviewed and the derived loads are compared to failure modes and measured loads from Confederation Bridge for selected events involving FY ridges. Based on these comparisons a hybrid of Models B and C is recommended and the paper gives the details of how to apply this method. When used for example structures, the new model gives loads which are 40 – 50% lower than the current approach implied in ISO 19906. The method can be adapted to downward sloping structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信