Revisiting super-resolution for internet video streaming

Recent advancements of neural-enhanced techniques, especially super-resolution (SR), show great potential in revolutionizing the landscape of Internet video delivery. However, there are still quite a few key questions (e.g., how to choose a proper resolution configuration for training samples, how to set the training patch size, how to perform the best patch selection, how to set the update frequency of SR model) that have not been well investigated and understood. In this paper, we perform a dedicated measurement study to revisit super-resolution techniques for Internet video streaming. Our measurements are based on real-world video datasets, and the results provide a number of important insights: (1) It is possible that the SR model trained with low-resolution patches (e.g., (540p, 1080p) pairs) can achieve almost the same performance as that trained with high-resolution patches (e.g., (1080p, 2160p) pairs); (2) Compared to the saliency of training patches, the size of training patches has little impact on the performance of trained SR model; (3) The improvement of video quality brought by more frequent SR model update is not very significant. We also discuss the implications of our findings for system design, and we believe that our work is essential for paving the way for the success of future neural-enhanced video streaming systems.