1型糖尿病患者斋月斋戒的认知与实践

Inass Taha, I. Sultan, A. Al-Harby, Randa Alharizi, Lama Ghandoura
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者斋月斋戒的认知与实践","authors":"Inass Taha, I. Sultan, A. Al-Harby, Randa Alharizi, Lama Ghandoura","doi":"10.30918/IRJMMS.71.18.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many type 1 diabetes patients (T1DM) choose to fast during Ramadan despite having an increased risk according to guidelines. Their fasting perception and practice need to be explored. The objective of this study is to examine the fasting perception and practice among T1DM patients in relation to their risk categories, metabolic conditions and in the view of practical guidelines. This cross sectional study included 113 adolescent and young Saudis with T1DM on basal bolus regimen from the diabetic center in Madinah. Data on fasting perception and practice were collected from patients 2 weeks after the end of Ramadan 2017 together with reviewing medical records. Risk categorization was performed according to Diabetes and Ramadan (DAR) 2016. The very high risk group included 78.8%. Fasting was safe by 85.5%, obligatory by 67.8%, exempted by 2.5%, and not indicated for pregnant by 6.8%. Compensation for non-fasting days was obligatory by 81.4% with 16.8% used to fast extra days outside Ramadan. Among the 113 patients, 86.7% experienced fasting (70.8% full fasters) with no significant difference in risk categories. Some patients followed the recommendations during fasting (proper meals in 26.5% at sunset , 73.5% at pre-dawn, 72.4% decreased activity, 60.1% increased fluid intake, 75.5% had inverted sleep pattern, 37.8% decreased insulin doses, 75.5% performed regular SMBG and 5.1% had professional supervision). Severe complications were 5.1% DKA and 1% severe hypoglycemia. Significant predictors for non-fasting were adolescence (p=0.036), recurrent hypoglycemia (p=0.013), harm perception (p=0.006), non-compensation (p=0.000) and comorbidities (p=0.039). In conclusion, most T1DM patients chose to fast during Ramadan without adequate support or following strict guidelines. Most of them do not experience any adversities and if they break fasting (mostly due to hypoglycemia), they are able to compensate later. Adolescent patients with harm perception, recurrent hypoglycemia, and no tendency to compensate for non-fasting showed less positive attitude towards fasting. More specific guidelines, education, and professional supervision are needed for these patients during Ramadan.","PeriodicalId":170316,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception and practice of Ramadan fasting among patients with type I diabetes mellitus in the view of the practical guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Inass Taha, I. Sultan, A. Al-Harby, Randa Alharizi, Lama Ghandoura\",\"doi\":\"10.30918/IRJMMS.71.18.070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many type 1 diabetes patients (T1DM) choose to fast during Ramadan despite having an increased risk according to guidelines. Their fasting perception and practice need to be explored. The objective of this study is to examine the fasting perception and practice among T1DM patients in relation to their risk categories, metabolic conditions and in the view of practical guidelines. This cross sectional study included 113 adolescent and young Saudis with T1DM on basal bolus regimen from the diabetic center in Madinah. Data on fasting perception and practice were collected from patients 2 weeks after the end of Ramadan 2017 together with reviewing medical records. Risk categorization was performed according to Diabetes and Ramadan (DAR) 2016. The very high risk group included 78.8%. Fasting was safe by 85.5%, obligatory by 67.8%, exempted by 2.5%, and not indicated for pregnant by 6.8%. Compensation for non-fasting days was obligatory by 81.4% with 16.8% used to fast extra days outside Ramadan. Among the 113 patients, 86.7% experienced fasting (70.8% full fasters) with no significant difference in risk categories. Some patients followed the recommendations during fasting (proper meals in 26.5% at sunset , 73.5% at pre-dawn, 72.4% decreased activity, 60.1% increased fluid intake, 75.5% had inverted sleep pattern, 37.8% decreased insulin doses, 75.5% performed regular SMBG and 5.1% had professional supervision). Severe complications were 5.1% DKA and 1% severe hypoglycemia. Significant predictors for non-fasting were adolescence (p=0.036), recurrent hypoglycemia (p=0.013), harm perception (p=0.006), non-compensation (p=0.000) and comorbidities (p=0.039). In conclusion, most T1DM patients chose to fast during Ramadan without adequate support or following strict guidelines. Most of them do not experience any adversities and if they break fasting (mostly due to hypoglycemia), they are able to compensate later. Adolescent patients with harm perception, recurrent hypoglycemia, and no tendency to compensate for non-fasting showed less positive attitude towards fasting. More specific guidelines, education, and professional supervision are needed for these patients during Ramadan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30918/IRJMMS.71.18.070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30918/IRJMMS.71.18.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根据指南,许多1型糖尿病患者(T1DM)选择在斋月期间禁食,尽管风险增加。他们的斋戒观念和实践需要探索。本研究的目的是研究T1DM患者的禁食认知和实践与他们的风险类别、代谢状况和实用指南的关系。这项横断面研究包括来自麦地那糖尿病中心的113名患有T1DM的沙特青少年和年轻患者。2017年斋月结束两周后,从患者中收集了禁食感知和实践的数据,并审查了医疗记录。根据糖尿病和斋月(DAR) 2016进行风险分类。高危人群占78.8%。85.5%的人认为禁食是安全的,67.8%的人认为禁食是必须的,2.5%的人认为禁食是豁免的,6.8%的人认为不适合怀孕。81.4%的人必须对非斋戒日进行补偿,16.8%的人在斋月之外额外禁食。113例患者中,86.7%禁食(70.8%完全禁食),风险类别无显著差异。一些患者在禁食期间遵循建议(26.5%的患者在日落时适当进食,73.5%的患者在黎明前适当进食,72.4%的患者活动减少,60.1%的患者增加液体摄入量,75.5%的患者有倒转睡眠模式,37.8%的患者减少胰岛素剂量,75.5%的患者有定期SMBG, 5.1%的患者有专业监督)。严重并发症为5.1% DKA和1%严重低血糖。非禁食的显著预测因子为青春期(p=0.036)、反复低血糖(p=0.013)、伤害感知(p=0.006)、无补偿(p=0.000)和合并症(p=0.039)。总之,大多数T1DM患者在斋月期间选择禁食,没有足够的支持或严格的指导。他们中的大多数人不会遇到任何逆境,如果他们中断禁食(主要是由于低血糖),他们能够在以后进行补偿。有伤害认知、反复低血糖、无非禁食补偿倾向的青少年患者对禁食的积极态度较差。在斋月期间,这些患者需要更具体的指导方针、教育和专业监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception and practice of Ramadan fasting among patients with type I diabetes mellitus in the view of the practical guidelines
Many type 1 diabetes patients (T1DM) choose to fast during Ramadan despite having an increased risk according to guidelines. Their fasting perception and practice need to be explored. The objective of this study is to examine the fasting perception and practice among T1DM patients in relation to their risk categories, metabolic conditions and in the view of practical guidelines. This cross sectional study included 113 adolescent and young Saudis with T1DM on basal bolus regimen from the diabetic center in Madinah. Data on fasting perception and practice were collected from patients 2 weeks after the end of Ramadan 2017 together with reviewing medical records. Risk categorization was performed according to Diabetes and Ramadan (DAR) 2016. The very high risk group included 78.8%. Fasting was safe by 85.5%, obligatory by 67.8%, exempted by 2.5%, and not indicated for pregnant by 6.8%. Compensation for non-fasting days was obligatory by 81.4% with 16.8% used to fast extra days outside Ramadan. Among the 113 patients, 86.7% experienced fasting (70.8% full fasters) with no significant difference in risk categories. Some patients followed the recommendations during fasting (proper meals in 26.5% at sunset , 73.5% at pre-dawn, 72.4% decreased activity, 60.1% increased fluid intake, 75.5% had inverted sleep pattern, 37.8% decreased insulin doses, 75.5% performed regular SMBG and 5.1% had professional supervision). Severe complications were 5.1% DKA and 1% severe hypoglycemia. Significant predictors for non-fasting were adolescence (p=0.036), recurrent hypoglycemia (p=0.013), harm perception (p=0.006), non-compensation (p=0.000) and comorbidities (p=0.039). In conclusion, most T1DM patients chose to fast during Ramadan without adequate support or following strict guidelines. Most of them do not experience any adversities and if they break fasting (mostly due to hypoglycemia), they are able to compensate later. Adolescent patients with harm perception, recurrent hypoglycemia, and no tendency to compensate for non-fasting showed less positive attitude towards fasting. More specific guidelines, education, and professional supervision are needed for these patients during Ramadan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信