综合市场与分割市场:对出口定价和福利的影响

Raphael N. Becker, Sergey Nigai, Tobias Seidel
{"title":"综合市场与分割市场:对出口定价和福利的影响","authors":"Raphael N. Becker, Sergey Nigai, Tobias Seidel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3707942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper challenges the common assumption of market segmentation in international trade. To analyze export entry and pricing decisions of firms in integrated vs. segmented markets, we develop a novel tractable approach based on stochastic export costs that allows us to compare firm-level and aggregate outcomes under arbitrary market interdependence. We find that allowing for potential re-exporting arbitrage between countries imposes constraints on export prices of firms and has first-order implications for trade and welfare.","PeriodicalId":360530,"journal":{"name":"CESifo Working Paper Series","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Versus Segmented Markets: Implications for Export Pricing and Welfare\",\"authors\":\"Raphael N. Becker, Sergey Nigai, Tobias Seidel\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3707942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper challenges the common assumption of market segmentation in international trade. To analyze export entry and pricing decisions of firms in integrated vs. segmented markets, we develop a novel tractable approach based on stochastic export costs that allows us to compare firm-level and aggregate outcomes under arbitrary market interdependence. We find that allowing for potential re-exporting arbitrage between countries imposes constraints on export prices of firms and has first-order implications for trade and welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CESifo Working Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CESifo Working Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESifo Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对国际贸易中市场分割的普遍假设提出了挑战。为了分析企业在整合市场和细分市场中的出口进入和定价决策,我们基于随机出口成本开发了一种新颖的可处理方法,使我们能够比较任意市场相互依赖下的企业水平和总体结果。我们发现,允许国家间潜在的再出口套利会限制企业的出口价格,并对贸易和福利产生一级影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated Versus Segmented Markets: Implications for Export Pricing and Welfare
This paper challenges the common assumption of market segmentation in international trade. To analyze export entry and pricing decisions of firms in integrated vs. segmented markets, we develop a novel tractable approach based on stochastic export costs that allows us to compare firm-level and aggregate outcomes under arbitrary market interdependence. We find that allowing for potential re-exporting arbitrage between countries imposes constraints on export prices of firms and has first-order implications for trade and welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信