高铁项目报道的框架分析——以Kompas.com、viva .co.为例

M. F. Ilham Z, Lukmanul Hakim
{"title":"高铁项目报道的框架分析——以Kompas.com、viva .co.为例","authors":"M. F. Ilham Z, Lukmanul Hakim","doi":"10.25124/liski.v9i1.5277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This analysis aims to know and discuss the framing structure made by media Kompas and Viva in reporting the employment of Chinese foreign workers in the KCJB project, which had made the community stormy because the Government chose to use foreign workers instead of local workers. The type of research used is qualitative research with Pan and Kosicki's framing analysis approach due to their explanation of framing, which is the process of making messages or information more prominent and making readers more focused on the message conveyed. The results of this study indicate that in terms of the syntactic structure, Kompas and Viva try to be neutral by using direct quotations in their titles and only conveying the facts. Thematically, Kompas and Viva provide good factual information because both media convey the existing facts as a unity without reducing or changing the facts obtained from the sources. Judging from the delivery of information, Kompas and Viva seem only to convey what it is without adding opinions or cutting facts. Rhetorically, both of them do not give emphasis and only convey facts obtained from the source. And even though they both lack the completeness of the 5W + 1H elements in some of their articles, they do not affect the core of the news delivered. \nKeywords: Framing, Highspeed Rail, Welder, Foreign Worker","PeriodicalId":341580,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing Analysis of High-speed Rail Project Reports on Online Media Kompas.com, and Viva.co.id\",\"authors\":\"M. F. Ilham Z, Lukmanul Hakim\",\"doi\":\"10.25124/liski.v9i1.5277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This analysis aims to know and discuss the framing structure made by media Kompas and Viva in reporting the employment of Chinese foreign workers in the KCJB project, which had made the community stormy because the Government chose to use foreign workers instead of local workers. The type of research used is qualitative research with Pan and Kosicki's framing analysis approach due to their explanation of framing, which is the process of making messages or information more prominent and making readers more focused on the message conveyed. The results of this study indicate that in terms of the syntactic structure, Kompas and Viva try to be neutral by using direct quotations in their titles and only conveying the facts. Thematically, Kompas and Viva provide good factual information because both media convey the existing facts as a unity without reducing or changing the facts obtained from the sources. Judging from the delivery of information, Kompas and Viva seem only to convey what it is without adding opinions or cutting facts. Rhetorically, both of them do not give emphasis and only convey facts obtained from the source. And even though they both lack the completeness of the 5W + 1H elements in some of their articles, they do not affect the core of the news delivered. \\nKeywords: Framing, Highspeed Rail, Welder, Foreign Worker\",\"PeriodicalId\":341580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25124/liski.v9i1.5277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25124/liski.v9i1.5277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本分析旨在了解和讨论媒体Kompas和Viva在报道KCJB项目雇用中国外籍工人时所采用的框架结构,由于政府选择使用外籍工人而不是当地工人,这使得社区风暴。由于Pan和Kosicki对框架分析方法的解释,所以使用的研究类型是定性研究,框架是使信息或信息更加突出,使读者更加关注所传达的信息的过程。本研究结果表明,在句法结构上,《康帕斯语》和《万岁》尽量保持中立,在标题中使用直接引语,只传达事实。从主题上讲,Kompas和Viva提供了良好的事实信息,因为两家媒体都将现有的事实作为一个整体传达,而没有减少或改变从来源获得的事实。从信息传递的角度来看,Kompas和Viva似乎只是传达了事实,而没有增加观点或削减事实。在修辞上,两者都不强调,只传达从来源获得的事实。尽管他们在一些文章中都缺乏5W + 1H元素的完整性,但他们并不影响所传递新闻的核心。关键词:框架;高速铁路;焊工
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framing Analysis of High-speed Rail Project Reports on Online Media Kompas.com, and Viva.co.id
This analysis aims to know and discuss the framing structure made by media Kompas and Viva in reporting the employment of Chinese foreign workers in the KCJB project, which had made the community stormy because the Government chose to use foreign workers instead of local workers. The type of research used is qualitative research with Pan and Kosicki's framing analysis approach due to their explanation of framing, which is the process of making messages or information more prominent and making readers more focused on the message conveyed. The results of this study indicate that in terms of the syntactic structure, Kompas and Viva try to be neutral by using direct quotations in their titles and only conveying the facts. Thematically, Kompas and Viva provide good factual information because both media convey the existing facts as a unity without reducing or changing the facts obtained from the sources. Judging from the delivery of information, Kompas and Viva seem only to convey what it is without adding opinions or cutting facts. Rhetorically, both of them do not give emphasis and only convey facts obtained from the source. And even though they both lack the completeness of the 5W + 1H elements in some of their articles, they do not affect the core of the news delivered. Keywords: Framing, Highspeed Rail, Welder, Foreign Worker
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信