我们的邻居莎士比亚

Niamh J. O'Leary, Jayme M. Yeo
{"title":"我们的邻居莎士比亚","authors":"Niamh J. O'Leary, Jayme M. Yeo","doi":"10.1353/shb.2021.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In an introduction to this special issue, we call for scholarly attention to Shakespeare's local habitations, arguing for the potential of regional Shakespeares to expand our field. We situate the study of regional Shakespeares in the continental United States among several related scholarly discourses: critical regionalism, global Shakespeare, adaptation studies, the \"amateur turn\" in performance studies, and interest in the methodologies of community-based theater. We chart the emergence of scholarship calling for a more localized, grassroots encounter with Shakespeare and introduce the scholarly, pedagogical, and political possibilities that this work makes available. We explore the limitations and possibilities of various definitions of regionality and identify five central investments shared by regional productions: material contact, interpersonal connections, the internal diversity of regions, connection to global and national concerns, and the ways Shakespeare and the region shape each other. Studying regional Shakespeare has an ethical dimension as it requires us to invest in our own local communities, enabling political and interpersonal care. This act of care is not tangential to the intellectual task of understanding Shakespeare's participation in a region, but central to it. Scholars of regional Shakespeare partner with practitioners and companies in the creative work of a community's self-becoming. Regional Shakespeare challenges the implicit assumption that Shakespeare is an outside observer who comments on a region. Instead, in the hands of regional artists and audiences, Shakespeare both is rendered local, and aids in rendering the local.","PeriodicalId":304234,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare Bulletin","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our Neighbor Shakespeare\",\"authors\":\"Niamh J. O'Leary, Jayme M. Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/shb.2021.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In an introduction to this special issue, we call for scholarly attention to Shakespeare's local habitations, arguing for the potential of regional Shakespeares to expand our field. We situate the study of regional Shakespeares in the continental United States among several related scholarly discourses: critical regionalism, global Shakespeare, adaptation studies, the \\\"amateur turn\\\" in performance studies, and interest in the methodologies of community-based theater. We chart the emergence of scholarship calling for a more localized, grassroots encounter with Shakespeare and introduce the scholarly, pedagogical, and political possibilities that this work makes available. We explore the limitations and possibilities of various definitions of regionality and identify five central investments shared by regional productions: material contact, interpersonal connections, the internal diversity of regions, connection to global and national concerns, and the ways Shakespeare and the region shape each other. Studying regional Shakespeare has an ethical dimension as it requires us to invest in our own local communities, enabling political and interpersonal care. This act of care is not tangential to the intellectual task of understanding Shakespeare's participation in a region, but central to it. Scholars of regional Shakespeare partner with practitioners and companies in the creative work of a community's self-becoming. Regional Shakespeare challenges the implicit assumption that Shakespeare is an outside observer who comments on a region. Instead, in the hands of regional artists and audiences, Shakespeare both is rendered local, and aids in rendering the local.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shakespeare Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shakespeare Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2021.0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2021.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在这期特刊的导言中,我们呼吁学术界关注莎士比亚的地方居住地,并认为地方莎士比亚具有拓展我们研究领域的潜力。我们将美国大陆地区莎士比亚的研究置于几个相关的学术话语中:批判地域主义,全球莎士比亚,改编研究,表演研究中的“业余转向”,以及对社区戏剧方法论的兴趣。我们描绘了学术的兴起,呼吁更本地化、更基层地与莎士比亚接触,并介绍了这项工作提供的学术、教学和政治可能性。我们探讨了各种地域性定义的局限性和可能性,并确定了地区作品共有的五个核心投资:物质接触、人际联系、地区内部多样性、与全球和国家关注的联系,以及莎士比亚和地区相互影响的方式。研究地区莎士比亚有一个伦理层面,因为它要求我们投资于我们自己的当地社区,实现政治和人际关怀。对于理解莎士比亚在一个地区的参与这一智力任务来说,这种关注行为并不是无关紧要的,而是至关重要的。研究地区莎士比亚的学者与从业者和公司合作,共同完成社区自我发展的创造性工作。地域莎士比亚挑战了一个隐含的假设,即莎士比亚是一个评论某个地区的外部观察者。相反,在当地艺术家和观众的手中,莎士比亚既被渲染成当地的,又有助于渲染当地的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Our Neighbor Shakespeare
Abstract:In an introduction to this special issue, we call for scholarly attention to Shakespeare's local habitations, arguing for the potential of regional Shakespeares to expand our field. We situate the study of regional Shakespeares in the continental United States among several related scholarly discourses: critical regionalism, global Shakespeare, adaptation studies, the "amateur turn" in performance studies, and interest in the methodologies of community-based theater. We chart the emergence of scholarship calling for a more localized, grassroots encounter with Shakespeare and introduce the scholarly, pedagogical, and political possibilities that this work makes available. We explore the limitations and possibilities of various definitions of regionality and identify five central investments shared by regional productions: material contact, interpersonal connections, the internal diversity of regions, connection to global and national concerns, and the ways Shakespeare and the region shape each other. Studying regional Shakespeare has an ethical dimension as it requires us to invest in our own local communities, enabling political and interpersonal care. This act of care is not tangential to the intellectual task of understanding Shakespeare's participation in a region, but central to it. Scholars of regional Shakespeare partner with practitioners and companies in the creative work of a community's self-becoming. Regional Shakespeare challenges the implicit assumption that Shakespeare is an outside observer who comments on a region. Instead, in the hands of regional artists and audiences, Shakespeare both is rendered local, and aids in rendering the local.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信