{"title":"COOP'04互动与知识管理研讨会摘要","authors":"M. Lewkowicz","doi":"10.1145/1027228.1027229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge management is often studied from the point of view of knowledge as an object which has to be clarified, archived, spread, shared. But there is another point of view in which we want to focus during this workshop, which is knowledge in action, or \"knowing\", instead of \"knowledge\", as (Cook, Brown, 1999) or (Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999) make the distinction. We thus fit in a historical current initiated by (Bannon, Kuutti, 1996), who used to distinguish a passive and an active or constructive view of Organizational Memory. We could then say that we adopt a social approach of Knowledge Management (Erickson, Kellogg, 2001; Ackerman et al. 2003), contrary to other works which deal with information problems. In other words we could claim stopping to think in terms of knowledge management, and starting to think in terms of supporting the larger social context in which knowledge management is embedded.","PeriodicalId":390207,"journal":{"name":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summary of COOP'04 workshop on interaction and knowledge management\",\"authors\":\"M. Lewkowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1027228.1027229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge management is often studied from the point of view of knowledge as an object which has to be clarified, archived, spread, shared. But there is another point of view in which we want to focus during this workshop, which is knowledge in action, or \\\"knowing\\\", instead of \\\"knowledge\\\", as (Cook, Brown, 1999) or (Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999) make the distinction. We thus fit in a historical current initiated by (Bannon, Kuutti, 1996), who used to distinguish a passive and an active or constructive view of Organizational Memory. We could then say that we adopt a social approach of Knowledge Management (Erickson, Kellogg, 2001; Ackerman et al. 2003), contrary to other works which deal with information problems. In other words we could claim stopping to think in terms of knowledge management, and starting to think in terms of supporting the larger social context in which knowledge management is embedded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Siggroup Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Siggroup Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1027228.1027229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1027228.1027229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
知识管理通常是从知识作为一个对象的角度来研究的,这个对象必须被澄清、存档、传播、共享。但在本次研讨会中,我们想要关注的是另一个观点,即行动中的知识,或“知道”,而不是“知识”,正如(Cook, Brown, 1999)或(Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999)所区分的那样。因此,我们符合(Bannon, Kuutti, 1996)发起的历史潮流,他曾经区分过组织记忆的被动和主动或建设性观点。然后我们可以说我们采用了知识管理的社会方法(埃里克森,凯洛格,2001;Ackerman et al. 2003),与其他处理信息问题的作品相反。换句话说,我们可以停止从知识管理的角度来思考,并开始从支持知识管理嵌入的更大的社会背景的角度来思考。
Summary of COOP'04 workshop on interaction and knowledge management
Knowledge management is often studied from the point of view of knowledge as an object which has to be clarified, archived, spread, shared. But there is another point of view in which we want to focus during this workshop, which is knowledge in action, or "knowing", instead of "knowledge", as (Cook, Brown, 1999) or (Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999) make the distinction. We thus fit in a historical current initiated by (Bannon, Kuutti, 1996), who used to distinguish a passive and an active or constructive view of Organizational Memory. We could then say that we adopt a social approach of Knowledge Management (Erickson, Kellogg, 2001; Ackerman et al. 2003), contrary to other works which deal with information problems. In other words we could claim stopping to think in terms of knowledge management, and starting to think in terms of supporting the larger social context in which knowledge management is embedded.