当代法夫瑟尔方法论(法扎尔·拉赫曼和穆罕默德·SYAHRUR思想的比较研究)

Zulyadain Zulyadain
{"title":"当代法夫瑟尔方法论(法扎尔·拉赫曼和穆罕默德·SYAHRUR思想的比较研究)","authors":"Zulyadain Zulyadain","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, there is a difference between Rahman and about the nature of interpretation, for Rahman the essence of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through socio-historical context the past, then capture the moral ideal aspect to contextualize the meaning in the present era with a new methodology. While syahrur, interpretation does not have to be like that, an interpreter, does not have to determine authentic meaning (original meaning) in the past, but can only immediately search for the meaning of the relevant text in the presentnera, because that meaning can also develop according to contemporary scientifc reasoning. The Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. Thus, Fazlur Rahman and Muhammad Sharur are progressive fgures of Muslims who carry out reforms as well as deconstruction and reconstruction of the study of the Qur’an’s interpretation in the contemporary era. Both are concerned with the Islamic paradigm that touches reality, by offering new interpretations and methodologies to religious teachings, to produce more humanist teachings","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METODOLOGI TAfSIR KONTEMPORER (STUDI KOMPARASI ATAS PEMIKIRAN fAzLUR RAHMAN DAN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR)\",\"authors\":\"Zulyadain Zulyadain\",\"doi\":\"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, there is a difference between Rahman and about the nature of interpretation, for Rahman the essence of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through socio-historical context the past, then capture the moral ideal aspect to contextualize the meaning in the present era with a new methodology. While syahrur, interpretation does not have to be like that, an interpreter, does not have to determine authentic meaning (original meaning) in the past, but can only immediately search for the meaning of the relevant text in the presentnera, because that meaning can also develop according to contemporary scientifc reasoning. The Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. Thus, Fazlur Rahman and Muhammad Sharur are progressive fgures of Muslims who carry out reforms as well as deconstruction and reconstruction of the study of the Qur’an’s interpretation in the contemporary era. Both are concerned with the Islamic paradigm that touches reality, by offering new interpretations and methodologies to religious teachings, to produce more humanist teachings\",\"PeriodicalId\":239970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"el-'Umdah\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"el-'Umdah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"el-'Umdah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

解释的主要问题实际上是意义的赋予和意义的产生,然而,拉赫曼与解释的本质存在差异,对于拉赫曼来说,解释的本质是解释者如何能够通过过去的社会历史背景从文本中找到真实的意义,然后捕捉道德理想方面,以一种新的方法将当前时代的意义语境化。而syahrur,解释并不一定要这样,一个解释者,并不一定要去确定过去的真实意义(原意),而只能在当下立即寻找相关文本的意义,因为那个意义也可以根据当代的科学推理来发展。《古兰经》必须被看作是昨天才降下来的,先知刚刚向我们致意。因此,Fazlur Rahman和Muhammad Sharur是穆斯林的进步人物,他们在当代对古兰经解释研究进行了改革,也进行了解构和重建。两者都关注触及现实的伊斯兰范式,通过对宗教教义提供新的解释和方法,以产生更多的人文主义教义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
METODOLOGI TAfSIR KONTEMPORER (STUDI KOMPARASI ATAS PEMIKIRAN fAzLUR RAHMAN DAN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR)
The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, there is a difference between Rahman and about the nature of interpretation, for Rahman the essence of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through socio-historical context the past, then capture the moral ideal aspect to contextualize the meaning in the present era with a new methodology. While syahrur, interpretation does not have to be like that, an interpreter, does not have to determine authentic meaning (original meaning) in the past, but can only immediately search for the meaning of the relevant text in the presentnera, because that meaning can also develop according to contemporary scientifc reasoning. The Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. Thus, Fazlur Rahman and Muhammad Sharur are progressive fgures of Muslims who carry out reforms as well as deconstruction and reconstruction of the study of the Qur’an’s interpretation in the contemporary era. Both are concerned with the Islamic paradigm that touches reality, by offering new interpretations and methodologies to religious teachings, to produce more humanist teachings
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信