基于霍夫变换的有效指纹比对方法的比较

Cynthia S. Mlambo, F. Nelwamondo, M. E. Mathekga
{"title":"基于霍夫变换的有效指纹比对方法的比较","authors":"Cynthia S. Mlambo, F. Nelwamondo, M. E. Mathekga","doi":"10.1109/ISBAST.2014.7013099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two effective and mostly used Hough Transform (HT) based fingerprint alignment approaches are compared, namely; Local Match Based Alignment (LMBA) and Discretized Rotation Based Alignment (DRBA). The comparison was performed by considering different conditions of minutiae points, which are rotation, translation and the number of minutiae points. In addition, this research reports the advantages of understanding the quality and relationships between the wide varieties of existing HT based fingerprint alignment methods. Minutiae points extracted from fingerprints of FVC2000 database were used on the experiments to compare these approaches. The results revealed that LMBA approach performs better than the DRBA approach on minutiae points set with larger rotation and small number of points. The DRBA approach was found to perform better with minutiae points with large amount of translation, and the computational time was less than that of LMBA approach. However, the memory usage required in DRBA is greater than memory required in LMBA.","PeriodicalId":292333,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST)","volume":"67 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of effective hough transform-based fingerprint alignment approaches\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia S. Mlambo, F. Nelwamondo, M. E. Mathekga\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISBAST.2014.7013099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two effective and mostly used Hough Transform (HT) based fingerprint alignment approaches are compared, namely; Local Match Based Alignment (LMBA) and Discretized Rotation Based Alignment (DRBA). The comparison was performed by considering different conditions of minutiae points, which are rotation, translation and the number of minutiae points. In addition, this research reports the advantages of understanding the quality and relationships between the wide varieties of existing HT based fingerprint alignment methods. Minutiae points extracted from fingerprints of FVC2000 database were used on the experiments to compare these approaches. The results revealed that LMBA approach performs better than the DRBA approach on minutiae points set with larger rotation and small number of points. The DRBA approach was found to perform better with minutiae points with large amount of translation, and the computational time was less than that of LMBA approach. However, the memory usage required in DRBA is greater than memory required in LMBA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST)\",\"volume\":\"67 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBAST.2014.7013099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBAST.2014.7013099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文比较了基于霍夫变换(Hough Transform, HT)的两种有效且最常用的指纹对准方法,即;局部匹配对齐(LMBA)和离散旋转对齐(DRBA)。通过考虑不同的分点条件(旋转、平移和分点个数)进行比较。此外,本研究报告了了解现有各种基于HT的指纹定位方法之间的质量和关系的优势。利用FVC2000数据库中提取的指纹特征点进行实验比较。结果表明,在旋转较大、点数较少的细节点集上,LMBA方法优于DRBA方法。结果表明,DRBA方法在处理平移量较大的细节点时表现较好,且计算时间小于LMBA方法。但是,DRBA中所需的内存使用量大于LMBA中所需的内存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of effective hough transform-based fingerprint alignment approaches
In this paper, two effective and mostly used Hough Transform (HT) based fingerprint alignment approaches are compared, namely; Local Match Based Alignment (LMBA) and Discretized Rotation Based Alignment (DRBA). The comparison was performed by considering different conditions of minutiae points, which are rotation, translation and the number of minutiae points. In addition, this research reports the advantages of understanding the quality and relationships between the wide varieties of existing HT based fingerprint alignment methods. Minutiae points extracted from fingerprints of FVC2000 database were used on the experiments to compare these approaches. The results revealed that LMBA approach performs better than the DRBA approach on minutiae points set with larger rotation and small number of points. The DRBA approach was found to perform better with minutiae points with large amount of translation, and the computational time was less than that of LMBA approach. However, the memory usage required in DRBA is greater than memory required in LMBA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信