不仅仅是一个幸运的猜测?-为忧心忡忡的法律系学生准备的基于信心的选择题

E. Schmid
{"title":"不仅仅是一个幸运的猜测?-为忧心忡忡的法律系学生准备的基于信心的选择题","authors":"E. Schmid","doi":"10.5771/9783845294681-195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well-known that the learning context can greatly influence students’ motivation and engagement with a subject matter. If students approach a new class with low confidence and worry that a subject matter is inherently unintelligible, what’s the point of investing time in attending lectures, revising notes or studying with a textbook? Vice versa, if students believe that they can significantly influence their grade at the exam with the right type and amount of investment, they are more likely to engage in goal-oriented learning. Teaching European Union Law to a large group of undergraduate students, I was interested in a teaching intervention that would give students an opportunity to obtain feedback both on their learning as well as on their self-assessment skills while at the same time building their confidence and easing their worries towards a new and seemingly unpopular subject matter. I decided to use confidence-based multiple-choice tests in my compulsory 2nd year module at a British university. Confidence-based MCQ quizzes or tests not only ask students to provide the correct answer(s) but also asks them to rate their own answers according to how confident they feel about their responses. The chapter provides an overview and evaluation of my largely positive experience and reflects on the further use of confidence-based multiple-choice tests and its limitations.","PeriodicalId":160015,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsdidaktik zwischen Theorie und Praxis","volume":"260 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More than a Lucky Guess? – Confidence-Based Multiple-Choice Questions for Worried Law Students\",\"authors\":\"E. Schmid\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845294681-195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well-known that the learning context can greatly influence students’ motivation and engagement with a subject matter. If students approach a new class with low confidence and worry that a subject matter is inherently unintelligible, what’s the point of investing time in attending lectures, revising notes or studying with a textbook? Vice versa, if students believe that they can significantly influence their grade at the exam with the right type and amount of investment, they are more likely to engage in goal-oriented learning. Teaching European Union Law to a large group of undergraduate students, I was interested in a teaching intervention that would give students an opportunity to obtain feedback both on their learning as well as on their self-assessment skills while at the same time building their confidence and easing their worries towards a new and seemingly unpopular subject matter. I decided to use confidence-based multiple-choice tests in my compulsory 2nd year module at a British university. Confidence-based MCQ quizzes or tests not only ask students to provide the correct answer(s) but also asks them to rate their own answers according to how confident they feel about their responses. The chapter provides an overview and evaluation of my largely positive experience and reflects on the further use of confidence-based multiple-choice tests and its limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rechtsdidaktik zwischen Theorie und Praxis\",\"volume\":\"260 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rechtsdidaktik zwischen Theorie und Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845294681-195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsdidaktik zwischen Theorie und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845294681-195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,学习环境可以极大地影响学生的动机和对主题的参与。如果学生带着不自信去上一门新课,担心某门课本身就不懂,那么花时间去听课、修改笔记或复习课本又有什么意义呢?反之,如果学生相信通过正确的投资类型和数量,他们可以显著影响他们的考试成绩,他们更有可能从事目标导向的学习。在向一大群本科生讲授欧盟法时,我对一种教学干预很感兴趣,这种干预可以让学生有机会获得关于他们的学习和自我评估技能的反馈,同时建立他们的信心,减轻他们对一门看似不受欢迎的新学科的担忧。我决定在一所英国大学的二年级必修模块中使用基于信心的选择题测试。基于信心的MCQ测验或测试不仅要求学生提供正确的答案,还要求他们根据对自己回答的信心程度对自己的答案进行评分。本章提供了一个概述和评价我的大部分积极的经验,并反映了进一步使用基于信心的多项选择测试及其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More than a Lucky Guess? – Confidence-Based Multiple-Choice Questions for Worried Law Students
It is well-known that the learning context can greatly influence students’ motivation and engagement with a subject matter. If students approach a new class with low confidence and worry that a subject matter is inherently unintelligible, what’s the point of investing time in attending lectures, revising notes or studying with a textbook? Vice versa, if students believe that they can significantly influence their grade at the exam with the right type and amount of investment, they are more likely to engage in goal-oriented learning. Teaching European Union Law to a large group of undergraduate students, I was interested in a teaching intervention that would give students an opportunity to obtain feedback both on their learning as well as on their self-assessment skills while at the same time building their confidence and easing their worries towards a new and seemingly unpopular subject matter. I decided to use confidence-based multiple-choice tests in my compulsory 2nd year module at a British university. Confidence-based MCQ quizzes or tests not only ask students to provide the correct answer(s) but also asks them to rate their own answers according to how confident they feel about their responses. The chapter provides an overview and evaluation of my largely positive experience and reflects on the further use of confidence-based multiple-choice tests and its limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信