{"title":"众包数据采集中查询难度和样本复杂度的权衡","authors":"Hye Won Chung, J. Lee, Doyeon Kim, A. Hero","doi":"10.1109/ALLERTON.2018.8636012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider a crowdsourcing system whose task is to classify $k$ objects in a database into two groups depending on the binary attributes of the objects. Here we propose a parity response model: the worker is asked to check whether the number of objects having a given attribute in the chosen subset is even or odd. A worker either responds with a correct binary answer or declines to respond. We propose a method for designing the sequence of subsets of objects to be queried so that the attributes of the objects can be identified with high probability using few (${n}$) answers. The method is based on an analogy to the design of Fountain codes for erasure channels. We define the query difficulty $\\overline {d}$ as the average size of the query subsets and we define the sample complexity $n$ as the minimum number of collected answers required to attain a given recovery accuracy. We obtain fundamental tradeoffs between recovery accuracy, query difficulty, and sample complexity. In particular, the necessary and sufficient sample complexity required for recovering all $k$ attributes with high probability is $n = c_{0}\\max\\{k, (k\\,\\log\\, k)/\\overline {d}\\}$ and the sample complexity for recovering a fixed proportion $(1-\\delta )k$ of the attributes for $\\delta =o(1)$ is $n=c_{1} \\max \\{k, (\\mathrm {k}\\log (1/\\delta ))/\\overline {d}\\}$, where $c_{0},\\, c_{1} >0.$","PeriodicalId":299280,"journal":{"name":"2018 56th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)","volume":"121 43","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade-offs Between Query Difficulty and Sample Complexity in Crowdsourced Data Acquisition\",\"authors\":\"Hye Won Chung, J. Lee, Doyeon Kim, A. Hero\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ALLERTON.2018.8636012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consider a crowdsourcing system whose task is to classify $k$ objects in a database into two groups depending on the binary attributes of the objects. Here we propose a parity response model: the worker is asked to check whether the number of objects having a given attribute in the chosen subset is even or odd. A worker either responds with a correct binary answer or declines to respond. We propose a method for designing the sequence of subsets of objects to be queried so that the attributes of the objects can be identified with high probability using few (${n}$) answers. The method is based on an analogy to the design of Fountain codes for erasure channels. We define the query difficulty $\\\\overline {d}$ as the average size of the query subsets and we define the sample complexity $n$ as the minimum number of collected answers required to attain a given recovery accuracy. We obtain fundamental tradeoffs between recovery accuracy, query difficulty, and sample complexity. In particular, the necessary and sufficient sample complexity required for recovering all $k$ attributes with high probability is $n = c_{0}\\\\max\\\\{k, (k\\\\,\\\\log\\\\, k)/\\\\overline {d}\\\\}$ and the sample complexity for recovering a fixed proportion $(1-\\\\delta )k$ of the attributes for $\\\\delta =o(1)$ is $n=c_{1} \\\\max \\\\{k, (\\\\mathrm {k}\\\\log (1/\\\\delta ))/\\\\overline {d}\\\\}$, where $c_{0},\\\\, c_{1} >0.$\",\"PeriodicalId\":299280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 56th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)\",\"volume\":\"121 43\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 56th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2018.8636012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 56th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2018.8636012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trade-offs Between Query Difficulty and Sample Complexity in Crowdsourced Data Acquisition
Consider a crowdsourcing system whose task is to classify $k$ objects in a database into two groups depending on the binary attributes of the objects. Here we propose a parity response model: the worker is asked to check whether the number of objects having a given attribute in the chosen subset is even or odd. A worker either responds with a correct binary answer or declines to respond. We propose a method for designing the sequence of subsets of objects to be queried so that the attributes of the objects can be identified with high probability using few (${n}$) answers. The method is based on an analogy to the design of Fountain codes for erasure channels. We define the query difficulty $\overline {d}$ as the average size of the query subsets and we define the sample complexity $n$ as the minimum number of collected answers required to attain a given recovery accuracy. We obtain fundamental tradeoffs between recovery accuracy, query difficulty, and sample complexity. In particular, the necessary and sufficient sample complexity required for recovering all $k$ attributes with high probability is $n = c_{0}\max\{k, (k\,\log\, k)/\overline {d}\}$ and the sample complexity for recovering a fixed proportion $(1-\delta )k$ of the attributes for $\delta =o(1)$ is $n=c_{1} \max \{k, (\mathrm {k}\log (1/\delta ))/\overline {d}\}$, where $c_{0},\, c_{1} >0.$