比较德国和意大利的大学:高等教育格局的趋同还是分歧?

T. Agasisti, Carsten Pohl
{"title":"比较德国和意大利的大学:高等教育格局的趋同还是分歧?","authors":"T. Agasisti, Carsten Pohl","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1890568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine and compare the efficiency of Italian and German public universities and its evolution in the period 2001-2007. This topic is particularly important because of two main reasons: (i) as the universities are funded through public money in both countries, it is necessary to assess whether it has been used efficiently – especially in a period of pressures on public budgets; (ii) the comparison among (similar) European countries can stimulate a benchmarking exercise that can be useful for managerial and policy making purposes. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) we first derive efficiency scores for higher education institutions in both countries. In a second step, we apply a Tobit regression in order to detect external factors associated with the efficiency of universities. Overall, the results show that German universities are more efficient than their Italian counterparts. However the latter are catching-up: in the period 2001-2007 their efficiency improved more rapidly. Among the external factors, three are statistically related to efficiency: the presence of a medical faculty, the regional unemployment rate, and the regional share of workers employed in science and technology.","PeriodicalId":269992,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing German and Italian Universities: Convergence or Divergence in the Higher Education Landscape?\",\"authors\":\"T. Agasisti, Carsten Pohl\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1890568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we examine and compare the efficiency of Italian and German public universities and its evolution in the period 2001-2007. This topic is particularly important because of two main reasons: (i) as the universities are funded through public money in both countries, it is necessary to assess whether it has been used efficiently – especially in a period of pressures on public budgets; (ii) the comparison among (similar) European countries can stimulate a benchmarking exercise that can be useful for managerial and policy making purposes. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) we first derive efficiency scores for higher education institutions in both countries. In a second step, we apply a Tobit regression in order to detect external factors associated with the efficiency of universities. Overall, the results show that German universities are more efficient than their Italian counterparts. However the latter are catching-up: in the period 2001-2007 their efficiency improved more rapidly. Among the external factors, three are statistically related to efficiency: the presence of a medical faculty, the regional unemployment rate, and the regional share of workers employed in science and technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1890568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1890568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

在本文中,我们研究和比较了意大利和德国公立大学的效率及其在2001-2007年期间的演变。由于两个主要原因,这个主题特别重要:(i)由于这两个国家的大学都是由公共资金资助的,因此有必要评估这些资金是否得到了有效利用-特别是在公共预算压力时期;(ii)(相似的)欧洲国家之间的比较可以激发对管理和政策制定目的有用的基准练习。利用数据包络分析(DEA),我们首先得出了两国高等教育机构的效率得分。在第二步中,我们应用Tobit回归来检测与大学效率相关的外部因素。总体而言,结果显示德国大学比意大利大学效率更高。然而,后者正在迎头赶上:在2001年至2007年期间,它们的效率提高得更快。在外部因素中,有三个因素在统计上与效率有关:是否有医学院、地区失业率和受雇于科学技术领域的地区工人所占比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing German and Italian Universities: Convergence or Divergence in the Higher Education Landscape?
In this paper we examine and compare the efficiency of Italian and German public universities and its evolution in the period 2001-2007. This topic is particularly important because of two main reasons: (i) as the universities are funded through public money in both countries, it is necessary to assess whether it has been used efficiently – especially in a period of pressures on public budgets; (ii) the comparison among (similar) European countries can stimulate a benchmarking exercise that can be useful for managerial and policy making purposes. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) we first derive efficiency scores for higher education institutions in both countries. In a second step, we apply a Tobit regression in order to detect external factors associated with the efficiency of universities. Overall, the results show that German universities are more efficient than their Italian counterparts. However the latter are catching-up: in the period 2001-2007 their efficiency improved more rapidly. Among the external factors, three are statistically related to efficiency: the presence of a medical faculty, the regional unemployment rate, and the regional share of workers employed in science and technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信