《行为社会科学中的数据管理导论》,谢尔顿·布莱克曼和肯尼斯·戈德斯坦著,威利出版社,1971年

Ron Anderson
{"title":"《行为社会科学中的数据管理导论》,谢尔顿·布莱克曼和肯尼斯·戈德斯坦著,威利出版社,1971年","authors":"Ron Anderson","doi":"10.1145/1103259.1103261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is to register a strong disagreement with the review in the last SIGSOC Bulletin, which favorably described the Blackman and Goldstein book. The book was described as \"a useful book to recommend to people beginning to work on dissertation research projects or in a programming course aimed at social scientists.\" While the book is quite readable, it glosses over the techniques involved in setting up analysis for computer data processing and omits problems of even minimal complexity. Its chief weakness is the perspective that it leaves the reader. For one thing it suggests that the BMD and P-Stat packages are the major packages for social data analysis, but even more disturbing it suggests that one can get along quite well using the ccmputer without much understanding of techniques and principles involved. It most certainly would not be appropriate for \"a programming course aimed at social scientists,\" because not only does it suggest that programming skills are unnecessary, but it avoids interesting problems that programming is required to resolve. The negative consequences of teaching package usage alone have been previously stated at last year's Dartmouth Conference on ccmputers in undergraduate curriculum and at the ACM 1971 Panel on Social Science Computing Curricula. It is not clear to me why a book of the Blackman and Goldstein character should even appear in print given a more urgent need for other approaches in the social sciences. It certainly is justified as a mimeographed manual to be used as a supplementary resource for undergraduates utilizing computing for course projects. But the institutionalization of this kind of approach is most certainly questionable. I feel that much of the attitude of social science toward computing as low level, undesirable tedium results from an approach which over simplifies the techniques of computer utilization and implies that the most reasonable social scientists can go about their way quite well without understanding any computing. How can we stimulate students to tackle computing problems creatively, to optimize the potential of computing for the future of social sciences if we limit their exposure to control cards setups?","PeriodicalId":129356,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of \\\"An Introduction to Data Management in the Behavioral Social Sciences, by Sheldon Blackman and Kenneth Goldstein\\\", Wiley, 1971\",\"authors\":\"Ron Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1103259.1103261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is to register a strong disagreement with the review in the last SIGSOC Bulletin, which favorably described the Blackman and Goldstein book. The book was described as \\\"a useful book to recommend to people beginning to work on dissertation research projects or in a programming course aimed at social scientists.\\\" While the book is quite readable, it glosses over the techniques involved in setting up analysis for computer data processing and omits problems of even minimal complexity. Its chief weakness is the perspective that it leaves the reader. For one thing it suggests that the BMD and P-Stat packages are the major packages for social data analysis, but even more disturbing it suggests that one can get along quite well using the ccmputer without much understanding of techniques and principles involved. It most certainly would not be appropriate for \\\"a programming course aimed at social scientists,\\\" because not only does it suggest that programming skills are unnecessary, but it avoids interesting problems that programming is required to resolve. The negative consequences of teaching package usage alone have been previously stated at last year's Dartmouth Conference on ccmputers in undergraduate curriculum and at the ACM 1971 Panel on Social Science Computing Curricula. It is not clear to me why a book of the Blackman and Goldstein character should even appear in print given a more urgent need for other approaches in the social sciences. It certainly is justified as a mimeographed manual to be used as a supplementary resource for undergraduates utilizing computing for course projects. But the institutionalization of this kind of approach is most certainly questionable. I feel that much of the attitude of social science toward computing as low level, undesirable tedium results from an approach which over simplifies the techniques of computer utilization and implies that the most reasonable social scientists can go about their way quite well without understanding any computing. How can we stimulate students to tackle computing problems creatively, to optimize the potential of computing for the future of social sciences if we limit their exposure to control cards setups?\",\"PeriodicalId\":129356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1103259.1103261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigsoc Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1103259.1103261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是为了表达对上次SIGSOC公报的强烈反对,该公报对布莱克曼和戈尔茨坦的书进行了有利的描述。这本书被描述为“一本有用的书,推荐给那些开始从事论文研究项目或针对社会科学家的编程课程的人。”虽然这本书很好读,但它掩盖了为计算机数据处理建立分析所涉及的技术,甚至忽略了最小复杂性的问题。它的主要缺点是它留给读者的视角。一方面,它表明BMD和P-Stat软件包是社会数据分析的主要软件包,但更令人不安的是,它表明,一个人可以很好地使用计算机,而不需要对所涉及的技术和原理有太多的了解。它肯定不适合“面向社会科学家的编程课程”,因为它不仅表明编程技能是不必要的,而且它避免了需要编程来解决的有趣问题。在去年的达特茅斯大学本科课程计算机会议和ACM 1971年社会科学计算课程小组会议上,单独使用教学包的负面影响已经被陈述过。我不明白为什么布莱克曼和戈尔茨坦的书会出现在印刷中,因为社会科学更迫切地需要其他方法。作为一本油印手册,它当然是合理的,可以作为本科生在课程项目中使用计算机的补充资源。但这种方法的制度化肯定是有问题的。我觉得社会科学对计算的态度是低级的、不受欢迎的乏味,这是由于一种过度简化计算机使用技术的方法,并暗示最理性的社会科学家可以在不了解任何计算的情况下很好地工作。如果我们限制学生接触控制卡设置,我们如何激发学生创造性地解决计算问题,优化计算的潜力,为未来的社会科学服务?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of "An Introduction to Data Management in the Behavioral Social Sciences, by Sheldon Blackman and Kenneth Goldstein", Wiley, 1971
This is to register a strong disagreement with the review in the last SIGSOC Bulletin, which favorably described the Blackman and Goldstein book. The book was described as "a useful book to recommend to people beginning to work on dissertation research projects or in a programming course aimed at social scientists." While the book is quite readable, it glosses over the techniques involved in setting up analysis for computer data processing and omits problems of even minimal complexity. Its chief weakness is the perspective that it leaves the reader. For one thing it suggests that the BMD and P-Stat packages are the major packages for social data analysis, but even more disturbing it suggests that one can get along quite well using the ccmputer without much understanding of techniques and principles involved. It most certainly would not be appropriate for "a programming course aimed at social scientists," because not only does it suggest that programming skills are unnecessary, but it avoids interesting problems that programming is required to resolve. The negative consequences of teaching package usage alone have been previously stated at last year's Dartmouth Conference on ccmputers in undergraduate curriculum and at the ACM 1971 Panel on Social Science Computing Curricula. It is not clear to me why a book of the Blackman and Goldstein character should even appear in print given a more urgent need for other approaches in the social sciences. It certainly is justified as a mimeographed manual to be used as a supplementary resource for undergraduates utilizing computing for course projects. But the institutionalization of this kind of approach is most certainly questionable. I feel that much of the attitude of social science toward computing as low level, undesirable tedium results from an approach which over simplifies the techniques of computer utilization and implies that the most reasonable social scientists can go about their way quite well without understanding any computing. How can we stimulate students to tackle computing problems creatively, to optimize the potential of computing for the future of social sciences if we limit their exposure to control cards setups?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信