关于名称商标使用权的讨论:以偶像团体与原经纪公司之间的商标纠纷为中心

D. Lee, Sunki Hong
{"title":"关于名称商标使用权的讨论:以偶像团体与原经纪公司之间的商标纠纷为中心","authors":"D. Lee, Sunki Hong","doi":"10.21592/eucj.2022.40.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, a big wave of Korean culture is heating up the world, which indeed contributes to growing economy of Korea. In addition to the income earned from sales of music records and movies, the marketing business using the names of celebrities also forms a big size of market. As a result, there were often legal disputes arising from the rights of trademarks including the stage name or group name of celebrities. In particular, just before the end of the exclusive contract, the agency registered the celebrity's name as a trademark, thereby provoking a legal dispute between the former agency and the celebrities. In this study, we discussed whom the trademark rights, including celebrities’ names, should belong to. In the first session, we introduced two examples for disputes in regard to the trademarks including the idol group names. To express our critical opinions on this, it was discussed that the current trademark law could infringe on the personal rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Furthermore, our opinions to reasonably compromise these conflicts between the legal rights were proposed as follows. First of all, we suggest that it is necessary to legislate the publicity right, so that the personal right of celebrities can be protected as the property right is. Because the process of enacting a new law is very difficult, we proposed another idea to revise the current law. Thus, we noted that some provisions of the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act are needed to be revised for preventing the infringement of the personal rights, and also proposed our opinions on how to revise these provisions.","PeriodicalId":232789,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Association","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion on the right to use the name trademark: Focusing on trademark disputes between idol groups and their former agencies\",\"authors\":\"D. Lee, Sunki Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.21592/eucj.2022.40.213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, a big wave of Korean culture is heating up the world, which indeed contributes to growing economy of Korea. In addition to the income earned from sales of music records and movies, the marketing business using the names of celebrities also forms a big size of market. As a result, there were often legal disputes arising from the rights of trademarks including the stage name or group name of celebrities. In particular, just before the end of the exclusive contract, the agency registered the celebrity's name as a trademark, thereby provoking a legal dispute between the former agency and the celebrities. In this study, we discussed whom the trademark rights, including celebrities’ names, should belong to. In the first session, we introduced two examples for disputes in regard to the trademarks including the idol group names. To express our critical opinions on this, it was discussed that the current trademark law could infringe on the personal rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Furthermore, our opinions to reasonably compromise these conflicts between the legal rights were proposed as follows. First of all, we suggest that it is necessary to legislate the publicity right, so that the personal right of celebrities can be protected as the property right is. Because the process of enacting a new law is very difficult, we proposed another idea to revise the current law. Thus, we noted that some provisions of the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act are needed to be revised for preventing the infringement of the personal rights, and also proposed our opinions on how to revise these provisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Constitutional Law Association\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Constitutional Law Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21592/eucj.2022.40.213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Constitutional Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21592/eucj.2022.40.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,韩国文化在世界范围内掀起了一股热潮,这对韩国经济的发展起到了积极的作用。除了唱片和电影的销售收入外,利用名人的名字进行营销也形成了巨大的市场规模。因此,包括名人的艺名或团体名在内的商标权经常引起法律纠纷。特别是,在独家合同即将结束之前,经纪公司将名人的名字注册为商标,从而引发了经纪公司与名人之间的法律纠纷。在本研究中,我们讨论了包括名人姓名在内的商标权应该属于谁。在第一节中,我们介绍了两个涉及包括偶像团体名称在内的商标纠纷的案例。为了表达我们的批评意见,讨论了现行商标法可能侵犯宪法保障的人身权。在此基础上,就如何合理调和这些法律权利之间的冲突提出如下意见。首先,我们建议有必要对名人的肖像权进行立法,使名人的人身权像财产权一样受到保护。由于制定新法律的过程非常困难,我们提出了修改现行法律的另一个想法。因此,我们注意到《商标法》和《反不正当竞争法》的一些条款需要修改,以防止侵犯人身权,并就如何修改这些条款提出了我们的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussion on the right to use the name trademark: Focusing on trademark disputes between idol groups and their former agencies
Currently, a big wave of Korean culture is heating up the world, which indeed contributes to growing economy of Korea. In addition to the income earned from sales of music records and movies, the marketing business using the names of celebrities also forms a big size of market. As a result, there were often legal disputes arising from the rights of trademarks including the stage name or group name of celebrities. In particular, just before the end of the exclusive contract, the agency registered the celebrity's name as a trademark, thereby provoking a legal dispute between the former agency and the celebrities. In this study, we discussed whom the trademark rights, including celebrities’ names, should belong to. In the first session, we introduced two examples for disputes in regard to the trademarks including the idol group names. To express our critical opinions on this, it was discussed that the current trademark law could infringe on the personal rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Furthermore, our opinions to reasonably compromise these conflicts between the legal rights were proposed as follows. First of all, we suggest that it is necessary to legislate the publicity right, so that the personal right of celebrities can be protected as the property right is. Because the process of enacting a new law is very difficult, we proposed another idea to revise the current law. Thus, we noted that some provisions of the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act are needed to be revised for preventing the infringement of the personal rights, and also proposed our opinions on how to revise these provisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信